Article

Estrogen receptor α AF-2 mutation results in antagonist reversal and reveals tissue selective function of estrogen receptor modulators.

Receptor Biology Section, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 09/2011; 108(36):14986-91. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109180108
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The estrogen receptor (ER) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor containing two transcriptional activation domains. AF-1 is in the N terminus of the receptor protein and AF-2 activity is dependent on helix 12 of the C-terminal ligand-binding domain. Two point mutations of leucines 543 and 544 to alanines (L543A, L544A) in helix 12 minimized estrogen-dependent transcriptional activation and reversed the activity of the estrogen antagonists ICI182780 (ICI) and tamoxifen (TAM) into agonists in a similar manner that TAM activated WT ERα through AF-1 activation. To evaluate the physiological role of AF-1 and AF-2 for the tissue-selective function of TAM, we generated an AF-2-mutated ERα knock-in (AF2ERKI) mouse model. AF2ERKI homozygote female mice have hypoplastic uterine tissue and rudimentary mammary glands similar to ERα-KO mice. Female mice were infertile as a result of anovulation from hemorrhagic cystic ovaries and elevated serum LH and E2 levels, although the mutant ERα protein is expressed in the AF2ERKI model. The AF2ERKI phenotype suggests that AF-1 is not activated independently, even with high serum E2 levels. ICI and TAM induced uterotropic and ER-mediated gene responses in ovariectomized AF2ERKI female mice in the same manner as in TAM- and E2-treated WT mice. In contrast, ICI and TAM did not act as agonists to regulate negative feedback of serum LH or stimulate pituitary prolactin gene expression in a different manner than TAM- or E2-treated WT mice. The functionality of the mutant ERα in the pituitary appears to be different from that in the uterus, indicating that ERα uses AF-1 differently in the uterus and the pituitary for TAM action.

0 Followers
 · 
165 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The estrogen receptor (ER) is the number one target for the treatment of endocrine responsive breast cancer and remains a highly attractive target for new drug development. Despite considerable efforts to understand the role of ER post-translational modifications (PTMs), the complexity of these modifications and their impact, at the molecular level, are poorly understood. Using a chemical biology approach, fundamentally rooted in an efficient protein semisynthesis of tyrosine phosphorylated ER constructs, the complex role of the ER tyrosine phosphorylation is addressed here for the first time on a molecular level. The semisynthetic approach allows for the site-specific introduction of PTMs as well as biophysical probes. A combination of biophysical techniques, including NMR, with molecular dynamics studies reveals the role of the phosphorylation of the clinically relevant tyrosine 537 (Y537) in ERα and the analogous tyrosine (Y488) in ERβ. Phosphorylation has important effects on the dynamics of the ER Helix 12, which is centrally involved in receptor activity regulation, and on its interplay with ligand and cofactor binding, but with differential regulatory effects of the analogous PTMs on the two ER subtypes. Combined, the results bring forward a novel molecular model of a phosphorylation-induced subtype specific ER modulatory mechanism, alternative to the widely accepted ligand-induced activation mechanism.
    ACS Chemical Biology 11/2014; 10(2). DOI:10.1021/cb5007097 · 5.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Concerns regarding potential endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) have led to a need for methods to evaluate candidate estrogenic chemicals. Our previous evaluations of two such EDCs revealed a response similar to that of estradiol (E<sub>2</sub>) at 2 hours, but a less robust response at 24 hours, similar to the short-acting estrogen, estriol (E<sub>3</sub>). Microarray analysis using tools to recognize patterns of response have been utilized in the cancer field to develop of biomarker panels of transcripts for diagnosis and selection of treatments most likely to be effective. Biological effects elicited by long vs. short-acting estrogens greatly impact the risks associated with exposures, therefore it is important to develop tools to predict the ability to maintain estrogenic responses. Biological endpoints in uterine tissue and a signature pattern-recognizing tool that identified co-expressed transcripts allowed development and testing of a panel to classify potentially estrogenic compounds using an in vivo system. Although the endpoints are relevant to uterine tissue, the resulting classification of the compounds is important for other sensitive tissues and species. We evaluated biological and transcriptional endpoints with proven short and long-acting estrogens, and verify the use of our approach using a phytoestrogen. With our model, we were able to classify the diarylheptanoid D3 as a short-acting estrogen. We have developed a panel of transcripts as biomarkers which, together with biological endpoints, might be used to screen and evaluate potentially estrogenic chemicals and infer mode of activity.
    Environmental Health Perspectives 01/2015; DOI:10.1289/ehp.1307935 · 7.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The estrogens are female sex hormones that are involved in a variety of physiological processes, including reproductive development and function, wound healing, and bone growth. They are mainly known for their roles in reproductive tissues-specifically, 17β-estradiol (E2), the primary estrogen, which is secreted by the ovaries and induces cellular proliferation and growth of the uterus and mammary glands. In addition to the role of estrogens in promoting tissue growth and development during normal physiological states, they have a well-established role in determining susceptibility to disease, particularly cancer, in reproductive tissues. The responsiveness of various tissues to estrogen is genetically controlled, with marked quantitative variation observed across multiple species, including humans. This variation presents both researchers and clinicians with a veritable physiological puzzle, the pieces of which-many of them unknown-are complex and difficult to fit together. Although genetics is known to play a major role in determining sensitivity to estrogens, there are other factors, including parent of origin and the maternal environment, that are intimately linked to heritable phenotypes but do not represent genotype, per se. The objectives of this review article were to summarize the current knowledge of the role of genotype, and uterine and neonatal environments, in phenotypic variation in the response to estrogens; to discuss recent findings and the potential mechanisms involved; and to highlight exciting research opportunities for the future.-Wall, E. H., Hewitt, S. C., Case, L. K, Lin, C.-Y., Korach, K. S., Teuscher, C. The role of genetics in estrogen responses: a critical piece of an intricate puzzle.
    The FASEB Journal 09/2014; DOI:10.1096/fj.14-260307 · 5.48 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
22 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014