A review of atlas-based segmentation for magnetic resonance brain images.

Institute of Informatics and Applications, Ed. P-IV, Campus Montilivi, University of Girona, 17071 Girona, Spain.
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine (Impact Factor: 1.09). 08/2011; 104(3):e158-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.07.015
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Normal and abnormal brains can be segmented by registering the target image with an atlas. Here, an atlas is defined as the combination of an intensity image (template) and its segmented image (the atlas labels). After registering the atlas template and the target image, the atlas labels are propagated to the target image. We define this process as atlas-based segmentation. In recent years, researchers have investigated registration algorithms to match atlases to query subjects and also strategies for atlas construction. In this paper we present a review of the automated approaches for atlas-based segmentation of magnetic resonance brain images. We aim to point out the strengths and weaknesses of atlas-based methods and suggest new research directions. We use two different criteria to present the methods. First, we refer to the algorithms according to their atlas-based strategy: label propagation, multi-atlas methods, and probabilistic techniques. Subsequently, we classify the methods according to their medical target: the brain and its internal structures, tissue segmentation in healthy subjects, tissue segmentation in fetus, neonates and elderly subjects, and segmentation of damaged brains. A quantitative comparison of the results reported in the literature is also presented.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In neuroimaging studies, pathologies can present themselves as abnormal intensity patterns. Thus, solutions for detecting abnormal intensities are currently under investigation. As each patient is unique, an unbiased and biologically plausible model of pathological data would have to be able to adapt to the subject's individual presentation. Such a model would provide the means for a better understanding of the underlying biological processes and improve one's ability to define pathologically meaningful imaging biomarkers. With this aim in mind, this work proposes a hierarchical fully unsupervised model selection framework for neuroimaging data which enables the distinction between different types of abnormal image patterns without pathological a priori knowledge. Its application on simulated and clinical data demonstrated the ability to detect abnormal intensity clusters, resulting in a competitive to improved behavior in white matter lesion segmentation when compared to three other freelyavailable automated methods.
    04/2015; DOI:10.1109/TMI.2015.2419072
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since its introduction over a decade ago, diffusion tractography has come a long way from local, deterministic methods, over probabilistic approaches, towards global tractography. Yet, the development of tractography methods has been largely focused on single subject data, and very little on cross-population analysis and inter-subject variability. In this work, we extend global tractography with a prior on the local track orientation distribution (TOD), derived from 20 normal subjects. The proposed method is evaluated in 5 independent subjects. Results show that adding such prior regularizes the reconstructed track distribution, although registration errors can induce local artefacts. We conclude that atlas-guided global tractography can improve the fibre reconstruction and ultimately detect and quantify inter-subject differences in tractography. D. Christiaens () · T. Dhollander · F. Maes · P. Suetens Medical Image Computing,
    Computational Diffusion MRI. MICCAI Workshop, Boston, USA., Edited by Lauren O'Donnell, Genna Nedjati-Gilani, Yogesh Rathi, Marco Reisert, Torben Schnieder, 09/2014: pages 115-123; Springer, New York., ISBN: 978-3-319-11182-7
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we report the set-up and results of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) organized in conjunction with the MICCAI 2012 and 2013 conferences. Twenty state-of-the-art tumor segmentation algorithms were applied to a set of 65 multi-contrast MR scans of low- and high-grade glioma patients – manually annotated by up to four raters – and to 65 comparable scans generated using tumor image simulation software. Quantitative evaluations revealed considerable disagreement between the human raters in segmenting various tumor sub-regions (Dice scores in the range 74-85%), illustrating the difficulty of this task. We found that different algorithms worked best for different sub-regions (reaching performance comparable to human inter-rater variability), but that no single algorithm ranked in the top for all subregions simultaneously. Fusing several good algorithms using a hierarchical majority vote yielded segmentations that consistently ranked above all individual algorithms, indicating remaining opportunities for further methodological improvements. The BRATS image data and manual annotations continue to be publicly available through an online evaluation system as an ongoing benchmarking resource.