Article

Secular trends in the diagnosis and treatment of obesity among US adults in the primary care setting.

Faculty of Health, School of Kinesiology & Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Obesity (Impact Factor: 4.39). 08/2011; 20(9):1909-14. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.271
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Excess weight afflicts the majority of the US adult population. Research suggests that the role of primary care physicians in reducing overweight and obesity is essential; moreover, little is known about self-care of obesity. This report assessed the secular trends in the care of overweight and investigated the secular association between obesity with care of overweight in primary care and self-care of overweight. Cross-sectional evaluation of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (1988-1994) and the Continuous NHANES (1999-2008) was employed; the total sample comprised 31,039 nonpregnant adults aged 20-90 years. The relationship between diagnosed overweight, and directed weight loss with time and obesity was assessed. Despite the combined secular increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity (BMI >25.0 kg/m(2)) between 1994 and 2008 (56.1-69.1%), there was no secular change in the odds of being diagnosed overweight by a physician when adjusted for covariates; however, overweight and obese individuals were 40 and 42% less likely to self-diagnose as overweight, and 34 and 41% less likely to self-direct weight loss in 2008 compared to 1994, respectively. Physicians were also significantly less likely to direct weight loss for overweight and obese adults with weight-related comorbidities across time (P < 0.05). Thus, the surveillance of secular trends reveals that the likelihood of physician- and self-care of overweight decreased between 1994 and 2008 and further highlights the deficiencies in the management of excess weight.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Jennifer L Kuk, Aug 19, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
117 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the association between body mass index (BMI) and motor actions related to safety risks (primary aim), and to examine the reliability of a video coding procedure and the utility of a rhythmic walking task in identifying safety risks (secondary aims). Using a cross-sectional design, participants were filmed during a rhythmic walking task at slow, normal, and fast audio metronome paces. A video coding procedure was used to quantify signs of safety risks from the videotaped sessions. Motor development laboratory in a university. Adults (N=32) with normal (n=15) and overweight (n=17) BMI scores participated. Not applicable. Chi-squared analyses were conducted to compare the occurrence of coded motor actions (forward and lateral tripping) between participants with normal and overweight BMI scores. A kappa coefficient was computed as a measure of interrater reliability on the video codes. Participants who were overweight exhibited more safety risks compared with participants with normal BMI scores at the slow (χ(2)(1,N=32)=3.94, P<.05, d=.75) and fast (χ(2)(1,N=32)=3.85, P<.05, d=.74) metronome paces. Interrater reliability was high (κ=.90, P<.01). In support of the primary aim, the findings show a relationship between overweight BMI scores and safety risks. Toward the secondary aims, the results demonstrate that a video coding procedure can be reliably used to assess safety risks and that creating tasks appropriate for assessing safety risks in overweight adults is needed.
    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 01/2012; 93(4):728-30. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.012 · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Young children who are overweight are at increased risk of becoming obese and developing type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease later in life. Therefore, early intervention is critical. This paper describes the rationale, design, methodology, and sample characteristics of a 5-year cluster randomized controlled trial being conducted in eight elementary schools in rural North Carolina, United States. The first aim of the trial is to examine the effects of a two-phased intervention on weight status, adiposity, nutrition and exercise health behaviors, and self-efficacy in overweight or obese 2nd, 3 rd, and 4th grade children and their overweight or obese parents. The primary outcome in children is stabilization of BMI percentile trajectory from baseline to 18 months. The primary outcome in parents is a decrease in BMI from baseline to 18 months. Secondary outcomes for both children and parents include adiposity, nutrition and exercise health behaviors, and self-efficacy from baseline to 18 months. A secondary aim of the trial is to examine in the experimental group, the relationships between parents and children's changes in weight status, adiposity, nutrition and exercise health behaviors, and self-efficacy. An exploratory aim is to determine whether African American, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white children and parents in the experimental group benefit differently from the intervention in weight status, adiposity, health behaviors, and self-efficacy.A total of 358 African American, non-Hispanic white, and bilingual Hispanic children with a BMI ≥ 85th percentile and 358 parents with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² have been inducted over 3 1/2 years and randomized by cohort to either an experimental or a wait-listed control group. The experimental group receives a 12-week intensive intervention of nutrition and exercise education, coping skills training and exercise (Phase I), 9 months of continued monthly contact (Phase II) and then 6 months (follow-up) on their own. Safety endpoints include adverse event reporting. Intention-to-treat analysis will be applied to all data. Findings from this trial may lead to an effective intervention to assist children and parents to work together to improve nutrition and exercise patterns by making small lifestyle pattern changes. NCT01378806.
    BMC Public Health 03/2012; 12:250. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-250 · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • Archives of internal medicine 08/2012; 172(18):1-2. DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3269 · 13.25 Impact Factor