Variability in chemokine-induced adhesion of human mesenchymal stromal cells.
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AIMS. Intravenously applied mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are under investigation for numerous clinical indications. However, their capacity to activate shear stress-dependent adhesion to endothelial ligands is incompletely characterized. METHODS. Parallel-plate flow chambers were used to induce firm adhesion of MSC to integrin ligand vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1. Human MSC were stimulated by chemokine (C-C motif) ligand (CCL15)/macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP-5), CCL19/MIP-3β chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL8)/interleukin (IL)-8, CXCL12/ stromal derived factor (SDF-1) or CXCL13/B lymphocyte chemoattractant (BLC). RESULTS. Two MSC isolates responded to three chemokines (either to CCL15, CCL19 and CXCL13, or to CCL19, CXCL12 and CXCL13), two isolates responded to two chemokines (to CCL15 and CCL19, or to CCL19 and CXCL13), and one isolate responded to CCL19 only. In contrast, all tested MSC isolates responded to selectins (P-selectin and E-selectin) or integrin ligand VCAM-1, as visualized by a velocity reduction under flow. CONCLUSIONS. Inter-individual variability of chemokine-induced integrin activation should be considered when evaluating human MSC as cellular therapies.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background aims Human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) can suppress inflammation; therefore their therapeutic potential is being explored in clinical trials. Poor engraftment of infused MSC limits their therapeutic utility; this may be caused by MSC processing before infusion, in particular the method of their detachment from culture. Methods Enzymatic methods of detaching MSC (Accutase and TrypLE) were compared with non-enzymatic methods (Cell Dissociation Buffer [CDB], ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid and scraping) for their effect on MSC viability, chemokine receptor expression, multi-potency, immunomodulation and chemokine-dependent migration. Results TrypLE detachment preserved MSC viability and tri-lineage potential compared with non-enzymatic methods; however, this resulted in near complete loss of surface chemokine receptor expression. Of the non-enzymatic methods, CDB detachment preserved the highest viability while retaining significant tri-lineage differentiation potential. Once re-plated, CDB-detached MSC regained their original morphology and reached confluence, unlike with the use of other non-enzymatic methods. Viability was significantly reduced with the use of ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid and further reduced with the use of cell scraping. Addition of 1% serum during CDB detachment led to higher MSC numbers entering autophagy and increased MSC recovery after re-plating. TrypLE and CDB-detached MSC suppressed CD3+CD4+CD25− T-cell proliferation, although TrypLE-detached MSC exhibited superior suppression at 1:20 ratio. CDB detachment retained surface chemokine receptor expression and consequently increased migration to CCL22, CXCL12 and CCL4, in contrast with TrypLE-detached MSC. Conclusions This study demonstrates that non-enzymatic detachment of MSC with the use of CDB minimizes the negative impact on cell viability, multipotency and immunomodulation while retaining chemokine-dependent migration, which may be of importance in MSC delivery and engraftment in sites of injury.Cytotherapy 01/2014; 16(4):545–559. · 3.06 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Therapeutic approaches using multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are advancing in regenerative medicine, transplantation and autoimmune diseases. The mechanisms behind MSC immune modulation are still poorly understood and the prediction of the immune modulatory potential of single MSC preparations remains a major challenge for possible clinical applications. Here, we highlight galectin-9 (Gal-9) as a novel, important immune modulator expressed by MSCs, which is strongly upregulated upon activation of the cells by interferon-γ (IFN-γ). Further, we demonstrate that Gal-9 is a major mediator of the anti-proliferative and functional effects of MSCs not only on T cells but also on B cells. Here, Gal-9 and activated MSCs contribute to the suppression of antigen triggered immunoglobulin release. Moreover, we determined that Gal-9 expression could serve as a marker to predict a higher or lower immune modulatory potential of single cell preparations and therefore to distinguish the therapeutic potency of MSCs derived from different donors. Also in vivo coadministration of MSCs or murine Gal-9 resulted in significantly reduced IgG titers in mice immunized with human coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). In conclusion, Gal-9 acts as an immune modulator interfering with multiple cell types including B cells and Gal-9 may serve as a predictive indicator for clinical MSC therapy.Stem cells and development 10/2013; · 4.15 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: There is significant interest in the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as a potential therapeutic modality in disease and disorder, particularly those with an inflammation-based component such as coronary, renal and hepatic diseases. While there is no question that MSCs possess the capability to manipulate an ongoing inflammatory injury, the recruitment of these cells to injured sites is generally poor, and thus, open to manipulation. Enhancing the localised recruitment of MSCs to injured tissues may enhance the efficiency and efficacy of this mode of therapy. A number of techniques exist in the literature to improve the recruitment of MSCs to injured tissues, including the use of cytokines, chemical modifications and coating with either synthetic or biological particles. In addition to enhancing MSC recruitment, there is an increasing body of work examining techniques which may enhance the anti-inflammatory activity of these cells. This review will summarise the literature around these topics. This first section of this review summarises the current literature with regard to MSC homing and their recruitment during conditions of injury. In relation to the anti-inflammatory activity of MSCs, the role of systemic versus local activity will be discussed. The second part of the review focuses on the role of pretreatments in MSC therapy and how these may have potential for not only enhancing the recruitment of MSCs, but also their anti-inflammatory capabilities. In summary, it is clear that there is significant potential to improve the efficiency of MSC therapy and the techniques discussed in this review may be central to this in the future.Stem cell reviews 04/2014; · 5.08 Impact Factor