Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Step Quick Turn Test in Older Persons with a Unilateral Transtibial Amputation

Centre for Physiotherapy Research, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation / Association of Academic Physiatrists (Impact Factor: 2.2). 08/2011; 90(10):798-804. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318228bd45
Source: PubMed


This study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the Step Quick Turn Test in older transtibial amputees.
Fifteen male and female transtibial amputees repeated the timed "up and go" test and the Step Quick Turn Test measures of turn time (TT) and turn sway (TS) each to the prosthetic and sound side, approximately 2 wks apart.
The intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) for TT and TS were excellent (≥ 0.85). Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the timed "up and go" test and the TT of turning to each side and TS on the prosthetic side were excellent (≥ 0.75), whereas that for the TS to the sound side was fair to good (0.58).
The TT and TS demonstrate an acceptable reliability for individual use in a clinical setting with the exception of TT to the prosthetic side. Differences in validity between the prosthetic and sound sides were also identified, with TT demonstrating excellent validity against the timed "up and go" test for both sides, whereas the TS was weaker when evaluated toward the sound side.

35 Reads
  • Source
    • "As a consequence of these symptoms, PD patients present mobility impairments and lack of balance, which increase their risk of falls (70% of PD patients fall, at least once within a year [3]). To assess mobility and balance, three different tools had being widely used: the Berg Balance Scale (BBS [4] [5] [6] [7]), the " Timed up and Go " test (TUG [8] [9] [10]) and the Posture-Locomotor-Manual Test (PLM [11]). The gold-standard treatment for PD is the pharmacological approach. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a long-period multimodal exercise program on balance, mobility and clinical status of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods. Thirty-three PD patients were assigned into two groups: a training group ( T G - - - 𝑛 = 2 2 ; aged 6 7 . 2 3 ± 8 . 3 9 years) and a control group ( C G - - - 𝑛 = 9 ; aged 7 1 . 5 6 ± 8 . 5 0 years). The TG patients were enrolled in a 6-month multimodal exercise program. This program was designed to improve physical capacity components and to reduce PD impairments. Balance and mobility were assessed immediately before and after the training protocol using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the “Timed up and go” (TUG), and the Posture Locomotion Test (PLM). Also, clinical variables were assessed (disease stage and impairments). Results. The TG showed an improvement in the TUG ( 𝑃 = 0 . 0 0 6 ) while CG were not influenced by the 6-months period. Both groups showed no differences for BBS and PLM and for their disease impairments—assessed through the Unified Parkinson’s disease Scale. Conclusions. Long-term multimodal exercise programs are able to improve mobility of patients with Parkinson’s disease and therefore should be used on clinical day life.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and aim: Turning is an inherent problem in all lower limb amputees and more so in older dysvascular amputees. This study aimed to compare the turning performance of dysvascular amputees with that of the traumatic amputees. Technique: Six dysvascular transtibial amputees (69.83 ± 6.3 years) and six traumatic transtibial amputees (68.3 ± 6.6 years) completed the Step Quick Turn test of the NeuroCom(®) Balance Master and the Timed Up and Go Test. The measures used for comparison were as follows: turn time and turn sway of Step Quick Turn test, turning 180° to both the prosthetic and sound side and time taken to complete the Timed Up and Go Test. Discussion: The Mann-Whitney U test demonstrated a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the dysvascular and traumatic groups in turn sway to the prosthetic (70.7 ± 14.2 and 43.3 ± 9.7) and sound sides (72.5 ± 16.1 and 43.5 ± 8.2). Similar results were observed in turn time to the prosthetic (4.1 ± 1.4 and 1.7 ± 0.46) and sound sides (4.0 ± 1.3 and 2.1 ± 0.5). No significant difference was observed for the Timed Up and Go Test. Clinical relevance: The observed differences suggest that dysvascular amputees are less able to adapt to the challenges associated with turning. More attention is required in the rehabilitation of dysvascular amputees in turning tasks particularly towards the prosthetic side.
    Prosthetics & Orthotics International 04/2013; 38(1). DOI:10.1177/0309364613485114 · 1.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Assessment of control of posture using a task battery that represents work-related postural conditions is highly recommended for providing a comprehensive understanding of collective postural demands. However, dearth of evidence exists on the reliability of a task battery, thus precluding its use as an outcome measure in field research. This study investigated the intrasession reliability and systematic variation of force plate derived centre of pressure (COP) measures obtained during repeated performance of a task battery (lifting task, limits of stability and bipedal and unipedal stance). COP signals obtained during each task performance were processed to derive various time-domain COP measures. Statistical analyses revealed that 13 of the 19 COP measures displayed excellent relative (ICC(2,3) ≥ 0.75) and acceptable absolute reliability (SEM%: ≤ 10). Although COP measures displayed systematic variation, the differences were less or equal to the measurement error, except COP measures of unipedal stance and limits of stability. The chosen task battery is reliable and can be used for comprehensive evaluation of control of posture, in both field and laboratory research. Practitioner Summary: Repeated evaluation of multiple tasks together sequentially could introduce measurement variability. This study investigated intrasession reliability of a task battery representing common work-related postures. The chosen task battery was found to be reliable with acceptable measurement error and can be used in field research settings for evaluation of control of posture. Free online access:
    Ergonomics 01/2015; 58(6):1-10. DOI:10.1080/00140139.2014.994566 · 1.56 Impact Factor