Article

Qualitative Heuristics For Balancing the Pros and Cons

Theory and Decision (Impact Factor: 0.48). 02/2008; 65(1):71-95. DOI: 10.1007/s11238-007-9050-6
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT Balancing the pros and cons of two options is undoubtedly a very appealing decision procedure, but one that has received scarce
scientific attention so far, either formally or empirically. We describe a formal framework for pros and cons decisions, where
the arguments under consideration can be of varying importance, but whose importance cannot be precisely quantified. We then
define eight heuristics for balancing these pros and cons, and compare the predictions of these to the choices made by 62
human participants on a selection of 33 situations. The Levelwise Tallying heuristic clearly emerges as a winner in this competition.
Further refinements of this heuristic are considered in the discussion, as well as its relation to Take the Best and Cumulative
Prospect Theory.

0 Followers
 · 
143 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The concept of a bipolar query, meant as a database query that involves both mandatory and optional conditions, is discussed from the point of view of, first, flexible database querying and, second, some newer approaches to decision making involving affects and judgments, unconventional multicriteria decision making and the modeling of sophisticated user's intentions and preferences of a positive and negative character. Aggregation of the matching degrees against the negative and positive conditions to derive an overall matching degree is considered in the fuzzy logic and possibilistic setting. Moreover, the use of a multiple valued logic based formalism for the representation of positive and negative desires in the context of intention modeling is advocated.
    Intelligent Systems (IS), 2012 6th IEEE International Conference; 01/2012
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper provides an overview of possibility theory, emphasizing its historical roots and its recent developments. Possibility theory lies at the crossroads between fuzzy sets, probability and non-monotonic reasoning. Possibility theory can be cast either in an ordinal or in a numerical setting. Qualitative possibility theory is closely related to belief revision theory, and common-sense reasoning with exception-tainted knowledge in Artificial Intelligence. Possibilistic logic provides a rich representation set-ting, which enables the handling of lower bounds of possibility theory measures, while remaining close to classical logic. Qualitative possibility theory has been axiomatically justified in a decision-theoretic framework in the style of Savage, thus providing a foun-dation for qualitative decision theory. Quantitative possibility theory is the simplest framework for statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. As such it has close connections with random set theory and confidence intervals, and can provide a tool for uncertainty propagation with limited statistical or subjective information.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Farmers, in their role as production managers, have to make daily management decisions about the technical operations to be performed on the biophysical components of their farms. These decisions have important implications in terms of the sustainability of the farm business and deserve in-depth examination with a scientific approach. The traditional decision research paradigm assumes an idealized decision situation in which the farm manager knows all the relevant alternatives, their consequences and probabilities, and has fixed preferences and possesses the cognitive capacity to efficiently process them. Many studies have shown that the farmer's decision-making context does not meet these assumptions. We propose that our understanding of the decision made could be increased by focusing on the natural strategies used by farmers. We present some preliminary thoughts about the issues to be addressed, in particular, the various key notions such as objective, preference, uncertainty, anticipation and rationality. Particular attention is given to the heuristics that farmers use to: (i) select the relevant information to be taken into account; and (ii) simplify the decision process and make it easily tractable. We argue that a bounded rationality approach is required to examine in situ individual management behavior, explain performance differences between farmers and help identify possible improvements.
    IEMSS 2014 - 7th Intl. Congress on Env. Modelling and Software, San Diego; 06/2014

Preview

Download
Available from

Hélène Fargier