Can a photoscreener help us remotely evaluate and manage amblyopia?

Family Eye Group, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, PA 17601, USA.
American Orthoptic Journal 08/2011; 61:124-7. DOI: 10.3368/aoj.61.1.124
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT IntRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: To determine whether the plusoptiX® S04 photo-screener can assist in remotely managing amblyopia.
A retrospective chart review was performed on 103 children with amblyopia. All patients had a plusoptiX® screening performed while wearing their optical correction during a comprehensive pediatric ophthalmology examination.
Children were classified as being fully treated in their glasses or needing further intervention to treat their amblyopia and / or strabismus. Further treatment was indicated if children were found to have abnormal alignment and / or best corrected visual acuity of 20 / 40 or worse in either eye with correction. Photoscreening results for these children demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate and false positive rate of 69%, 84%, 31%, and 16%, respectively. When visual acuity and photoscreening were combined for children who initially passed the plusoptiX® screen, these metrics improved to 97%, 89%, 2.7%, and 11%, respectively.
Photoscreening combined with simple measurements of visual acuity may be a viable option for following efficacy of treatment in amblyopes. In some parts of the United States and in many areas of the world where telemedicine plays an increasingly important role, the plusoptiX® photoscreener could enhance vision care and may enhance telemedicine and the treatment of amblyopia.


Available from: Noelle S Matta, Jun 13, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is estimated that of the 45 million people who are blind worldwide in 2000, 1.4 million are children from middle-income and low-income countries, the majority of whom live in the poorest regions of Africa and Asia. The focus of this paper is to discuss the status of pediatric ophthalmology in developing countries and the progress that has been made in the areas of avoidable childhood blindness and visual impairment, particularly corneal scarring as a result of vitamin A deficiency, congenital cataract and retinopathy of prematurity. In addition, we will review the prevalence of uncorrected refractive error and discuss the access to pediatric ophthalmologists in developing countries. Some developing countries have begun incorporating vitamin A supplementation and measles immunizations and have seen a decrease in xerophthtalmia. With improvement in vitamin A status, cataract is becoming a more apparent cause of treatable childhood blindness. Amblyopia and uncorrected refractive errors are important and inexpensively treatable causes of visual impairment, with myopia being most common. As neonatal intensive care services in middle-income developing countries improve the survival of premature infants, retinopathy of prematurity is emerging as a significant cause of childhood blindness. Childhood blindness and visual impairment in developing countries remains a significant public health issue, but recent initiatives have shown promise of future improvements.
    Current opinion in ophthalmology 10/2008; 19(5):403-8. DOI:10.1097/ICU.0b013e328309f180 · 2.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to describe geographic proximity to and quantify relative supply of 7 pediatric surgical specialties in the United States. Data from the 2005 American Medical Association Physician Masterfile and the Claritas Pop-Facts Database were used to calculate subspecialty-specific, population-weighted, straight-line distances between each zip code centroid and the nearest provider. These same data sources were used to calculate the percentage of hospital referral regions with a provider, the percentage of the younger than 18 years population living within selected distances of providers, and provider-to-population ratios for each of the pediatric surgical subspecialties. Further, we calculated the correlation between practice locations and children's hospitals offering pediatric surgical services. Across pediatric surgical specialties, average distances to the nearest provider ranged from 27.1 miles for pediatric surgery to 100.9 miles for pediatric cardiothoracic surgery. The average population-weighted distance to a provider was less than 30 miles for pediatric surgery and pediatric ophthalmology only. For 5 of the 7 pediatric surgical specialties studied, approximately one quarter of the younger than 18 years population lives more than 1-hour drive from a provider. Provider-to-younger than 18 years population ratios range across hospital referral region from 0.04 per 100,000 for pediatric cardiothoracic surgery to 0.97 per 100,000 for pediatric surgery. The correlation between pediatric surgeons and children's hospitals offering services was 0.72. Although the practice locations of pediatric surgical subspecialties parallel the geographic distribution of children in the United States, large percentages of the younger than 18 years population must travel long distance to receive care from these providers. Large coefficients of variation reveal substantial maldistribution. These findings lay the groundwork for workforce assessments of the pediatric surgical subspecialties and underscore the need for future studies that assess access barriers for children in need of surgical care.
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery 04/2009; 44(3):483-95. DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.08.015 · 1.31 Impact Factor

Similar Publications