Article

VeinViewer-assisted Intravenous catheter placement in a pediatric emergency department.

Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Hasbro Children's Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Academic Emergency Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.2). 08/2011; 18(9):966-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01155.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV) placement is a common, painful, and frequently difficult procedure in children. The VeinViewer is a device that delineates subcutaneous veins using near-infrared light and video technology. To the best of our knowledge, the benefit of this device for PIV placement in children in the emergency department (ED) has not been studied.
The authors enrolled a prospective, randomized sample of children aged 0 to 17 years who required a nonemergent PIV in a tertiary care pediatric ED. Participants were randomized to standard PIV cannulation (SC) or PIV cannulation with the VeinViewer (VV). The primary outcome measure was time to PIV placement. Secondary outcome measures included number of PIV attempts and pain scores as reported by the child, parent or guardian, and nurse using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS).
A total of 323 patients completed the study: 174 boys and 149 girls. Age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were not different between groups. There were no differences in time to PIV placement, number of PIV attempts, or pain scores for the overall study group. However, a planned subgroup analysis of children age 0 to 2 years (n = 107) did yield significant results for the geometric mean time to place the PIV (121 seconds [VV] vs. 167 seconds [SC], p = 0.047) and for nurses' perception of pain (median VAS 34 [VV] vs. 46 [SC], p = 0.01).
While no results were significant for the overall study group, subgroup analysis of children age 0 to 2 years suggests that the VeinViewer may decrease the time to PIV placement.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
152 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Establishing intravenous access in children is often challenging for health professionals. Multiple attempts at peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) cause increased pain and delayed delivery of therapy. Our objective was to synthesize and evaluate the best evidence for novel interventions designed to improve pediatric PIVC. We searched for published and unpublished studies using MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google.ca. We included studies for meta-analysis if they were randomized, evaluated an intervention other than ultrasound, and reported on 1 of 3 primary outcome measures: success or failure of PIVC, number of attempts to successful cannulation, and procedure time. Two blinded reviewers assessed studies for eligibility and applied a data extraction form to those included. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of 3 different interventions were identified. A meta-analysis of 3 RCTs found that use of a transilluminator was associated with a decreased risk of first-attempt PIVC failure (risk ratio, 0.66; confidence interval, 0.41-1.06). Meta-analysis of 3 other RCTs found that near-infrared light devices do not impact the risk of first-attempt PIVC failure (risk ratio, 0.99; confidence interval, 0.74-1.33). Near-infrared light devices might be efficacious in selected subpopulations, but the available evidence does not support an overall benefit in the pediatric population. Transilluminators modestly improve pediatric PIVC, but the clinical significance of this benefit is questionable. Nitroglycerin ointments may increase the risk of PIVC failure and are associated with adverse effects.
    Pediatric emergency care 07/2013; 29(7):858-66. · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Recently, various near-infrared vascular imaging devices aimed at facilitating peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIC) were introduced, all claiming to increase success rate of PIC. We evaluated the clinical utility of a near-infrared vascular imaging device (VascuLuminator®) in pediatric patients who were referred to the anesthesiologist because of difficult cannulation.Methods There were 226 consecutive children referred to pediatric anesthesiologists by the treating pediatrician of the in- and outpatient clinic, because of difficulties with intravenous cannulation, were included in this cluster randomized clinical trial. The presence and use of the near-infrared vascular imaging device for PIC was randomized in clusters of 1 week. Success at first attempt (Fisher exact test) and time to successful cannulation (Log-rank test) were assessed to evaluate differences between groups.ResultsSuccess at first attempt in the group with the VascuLuminator® (59%) was not significantly different from the control group (54%, P = 0.41), neither was the median time to successful cannulation: 246 s and 300 s, respectively (P = 0.54).Conclusions Visualization of blood vessels with near-infrared light and with near-infrared vascular imaging device did not improve success of PIC in pediatric patients who are known difficult to cannulate.
    Pediatric Anesthesia 08/2014; · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To establish whether there is any association between passive smoking and pain perception in children, in the absence of existing studies into possible links. This single-centre study focused on 100 children - 50 who had been exposed to passive smoking and 50 who had not - who were admitted to general polyclinics from September 2012 to December 2012 and needed venous catheterisation. Patients with chronic diseases, neurologic and psychiatric illnesses, communication problems and analgesic use in the last 24 hours were excluded. The passive smoking group had a mean age of 7.3 years (56% male) and the non passive smoking group had a mean age of 7.7 years (44% male). The main study parameter was the Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale (WBFPS) score during catheterisation. There was a statistically significant difference between the pain perceptions of the 100 children studied and smoke exposure. The WBFPS scores of the 50 children who were passive smokers was significantly higher than the scores of the 50 who were not passive smokers (p=0.00). Passive smoking increases pain perception in children during invasive medical procedures. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Acta Paediatrica 07/2013; · 1.97 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads