The Influence of Changes in Dental Care Coverage on Dental Care Utilization Among Retirees and Near-Retirees in the United States, 2004–2006

Division of Health Services Research, University of Maryland Dental School, 650 West Baltimore St, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.55). 08/2011; 101(10):1882-91. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300227
Source: PubMed


We examined dental care utilization transition dynamics between 2004 and 2006 in the context of changing dental coverage status.
We used data from the Health and Retirement Study for persons aged 51 years and older to estimate a multivariable model of dental care use transitions with controls for dental coverage and retirement transitions and other potentially confounding covariates.
We found that Americans aged 51 years and older who lost dental coverage between the 2004 and 2006 survey periods were more likely to stop dental care use between periods, and those who gained coverage were more likely to start dental care use between periods, than those without coverage in both periods.
Dental coverage transitions and status have a strong effect on transitions in dental care use. Given that retirement is a time when many experience a loss of dental coverage, older adults may be at risk for sporadic dental care and even stopping use, leading to worse dental and potentially overall health.

Download full-text


Available from: Haiyan Chen, Jan 08, 2015
12 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Focusing on a Swedish 1942 birth cohort, this study describes the trend of dental health care utilization between age 50 and 65 and identifies major determinants of dental visiting habits using Andersen's model as adapted for dentistry as a theoretical framework. In 1992, a census of 50 year olds in two counties of Sweden was invited to participate in a longitudinal questionnaire survey. Of the total population of 8888 subjects, 6346 responded (71%). Of the 6346 subjects who completed the 1992 survey, 4143 (65%) completed postal follow ups in 1997, 2002 and 2007. 83.3% and 3.2% of the cohort remained stable with respect to use and nonuse of regular dental care. Cochran's Q test revealed that the proportions reporting regular use decreased from 93% at age 50–87% at age 65 (P < 0.001). Generalized estimated equations revealed the following covariates; gender (females), country of birth (native born), marital status (married), perceived quality of dental care (good perceptions), dental care utilization as a child, remaining teeth and perceived oral problems. The influence of the variable time, functioning as a measure of period/ageing, maintained a statistically significant relationship with regular utilization after adjusting for all covariates in the model. Regular use of dental health care services decreased slightly but statistically significantly from age 50 to 65 and was most prevalent in socio-economically advantaged groups, among those with remaining own teeth, subjects who perceived oral problems and reported high quality dental care. The results have implications for planning of elderly dental health care and required dental workforce in Sweden and countries with similar welfare systems.
    Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology 09/2012; 41(1). DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00709.x · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The purpose of this article is to examine the relationship between changes in household finances (wealth and income) and changes in dental utilization at the onset of the recent recession in a population of older Americans. Methods: Data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) were analyzed for U.S. individuals aged 51 years and older during the 2006 and 2008 waves of the HRS. We estimated logistic models of (a) starting and (b) stopping dental use between 2006 and 2008 survey periods as a function of changes in household wealth and income, controlling for other potentially confounding covariates. Results: We found that only when household wealth falls by 50 percent or more were older adults less likely to seek dental care. Changes in household income and other changes in household wealth were not associated with changes in dental utilization among this population. Conclusions: Older Americans' dental care utilization appeared to be fairly resilient to changes in household finances; only when wealth fell by 50 percent or more did individuals decrease dental use. This finding might extend to other health-care services that are preventive, routine, and relatively inexpensive.
    Journal of Public Health Dentistry 09/2012; 74(1). DOI:10.1111/j.1752-7325.2012.00370.x · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this research was to analyze the inconsistency in responses to survey questions within the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) regarding insurance coverage of dental services. Self-reports of dental coverage in the dental services section were compared with those in the insurance section of the 2002 HRS to identify inconsistent responses. Logistic regression identified characteristics of persons reporting discrepancies and assessed the effect of measurement error on dental coverage coefficient estimates in dental utilization models. In 18% of cases, data reported in the insurance section contradicted data reported in the dental use section of the HRS by those who said insurance at least partially covered (or would have covered) their (hypothetical) dental use. Additional findings included distinct characteristics of persons with potential reporting errors and a downward bias to the regression coefficient for coverage in a dental use model without controls for inconsistent self-reports of coverage. This study offers evidence for the need to validate self-reports of dental insurance coverage among a survey population of older Americans to obtain more accurate estimates of coverage and its impact on dental utilization. © The Author(s) 2014.
    Inquiry: a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing 11/2014; 51(1). DOI:10.1177/0046958014561325 · 0.55 Impact Factor