TrkB as a Potential Synaptic and Behavioral Tag

Gene, Cognition and Psychosis Program, NIMH, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-3714, USA.
The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 6.75). 08/2011; 31(33):11762-71. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2707-11.2011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Late-phase long-term potentiation (L-LTP), a cellular model for long-term memory (LTM), requires de novo protein synthesis. An attractive hypothesis for synapse specificity of long-term memory is "synaptic tagging": synaptic activity generates a tag, which "captures" the PRPs (plasticity-related proteins) derived outside of synapses. Here we provide evidence that TrkB, the receptor of BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor), may serve as a "synaptic tag." TrkB is transiently activated by weak theta-burst stimulation (TBS) that induces only early-phase LTP (E-LTP). This TrkB activation is independent of protein synthesis, and confined to stimulated synapses. Induction of L-LTP by strong stimulation in one synaptic pathway converts weak TBS-induced E-LTP to L-LTP in a second, independent pathway. Transient inhibition of TrkB around the time of weak TBS to the second pathway diminished L-LTP in that pathway without affecting the first one. Behaviorally, weak training, which induces short-term memory (STM) but not LTM, can be consolidated into LTM by exposing animals to novel but not familiar environment 1 h before training. Inhibition of TrkB during STM training blocked such consolidation. These results suggest TrkB as a potential tag for synapse-specific expression of L-LTP and LTM.

Download full-text


Available from: Robert Schloesser, Jun 29, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Memories are dynamic physical phenomena with psychometric forms as well as characteristic timescales. Most of our understanding of the cellular mechanisms underlying the neurophysiology of memory, however, derives from one-trial learning paradigms that, while powerful, do not fully embody the gradual, representational, and statistical aspects of cumulative learning. The early olfactory system-particularly olfactory bulb-comprises a reasonably well-understood and experimentally accessible neuronal network with intrinsic plasticity that underlies both one-trial (adult aversive, neonatal) and cumulative (adult appetitive) odor learning. These olfactory circuits employ many of the same molecular and structural mechanisms of memory as, for example, hippocampal circuits following inhibitory avoidance conditioning, but the temporal sequences of post-conditioning molecular events are likely to differ owing to the need to incorporate new information from ongoing learning events into the evolving memory trace. Moreover, the shapes of acquired odor representations, and their gradual transformation over the course of cumulative learning, also can be directly measured, adding an additional representational dimension to the traditional metrics of memory strength and persistence. In this review, we describe some established molecular and structural mechanisms of memory with a focus on the timecourses of post-conditioning molecular processes. We describe the properties of odor learning intrinsic to the olfactory bulb and review the utility of the olfactory system of adult rodents as a memory system in which to study the cellular mechanisms of cumulative learning.
    Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 07/2014; 8:238. DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00238 · 4.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An important cellular mechanism contributing to the strength and duration of memories is activity-dependent alterations in the strength of synaptic connections within the neural circuit encoding the memory. Reversal of the memory is typically correlated with a reversal of the cellular changes to levels expressed prior to the stimulation. Thus, for stimulus-induced changes in synapse strength and their reversals to be functionally relevant, cellular mechanisms must regulate and maintain synapse strength both prior to and after the stimuli inducing learning and memory. The strengths of synapses within a neural circuit at any given moment are determined by cellular and molecular processes initiated during development and those subsequently regulated by the history of direct activation of the neural circuit and system-wide stimuli such as stress or motivational state. The cumulative actions of stimuli and other factors on an already modified neural circuit are attenuated by homeostatic mechanisms that prevent changes in overall synaptic inputs and excitability above or below specific set points (synaptic scaling). The mechanisms mediating synaptic scaling prevent potential excitotoxic alterations in the circuit but also may attenuate additional cellular changes required for learning and memory, thereby apparently limiting information storage. What cellular and molecular processes control synaptic strengths before and after experience/activity and its reversals? In this review we will explore the synapse-, whole cell-, and circuit level-specific processes that contribute to an overall zero sum-like set of changes and long-term maintenance of synapse strengths as a consequence of the accommodative interactions between long-term synaptic plasticity and homeostasis.
    Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) 02/2014; 21(3):128-34. DOI:10.1101/lm.027326.112 · 4.38 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Motivated by the synaptic tagging and capture (STC) hypothesis, it was recently shown that a weak learning, only able to produce short-term memory (STM), can succeed in establishing long-term memory (LTM) with a concomitant, stronger experience. This is consistent with the capture, by the first - tagged event, of the so-called plasticity related proteins (PRPs) provided by the second one. Here we describe how a concomitant session of reactivation/ reconsolidation of a stronger, Contextual Fear Conditioning (CFC) memory, allowed LTM to result from a weak Spatial Object Recognition (wSOR) training. Consistent with an STC process, the effect was observed only during a critical time window and was dependent on the CFC reconsolidation-related protein synthesis. Retrieval by itself (without reconsolidation) did not have the same promoting effect. We also found that the inactivation of the NMDA receptor by AP5 prevented wSOR training to receive this support of CFC reconsolidation (supposedly through the production of PRPs), which may be the equivalent of blocking the setting of a learning tag in the dorsal CA1 region for that task. Furthermore, either a Water Maze reconsolidation, on a CFC extinction session, allowed the formation of wSOR-LTM. These results suggest for the first time that a reconsolidation session can promote the consolidation of a concomitant weak learning through a probable STC mechanism. These findings allow new insights concerning the influence of reconsolidation in the acquisition of memories of otherwise unrelated events during daily life situations. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Hippocampus 10/2013; 23(10). DOI:10.1002/hipo.22149 · 4.30 Impact Factor