Exome sequencing identifies ACSF3 as the cause of Combined Malonic and Methylmalonic Aciduria

Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Nature Genetics (Impact Factor: 29.65). 08/2011; 43(9):883-6. DOI: 10.1038/ng.908
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We used exome sequencing to identify the genetic basis of combined malonic and methylmalonic aciduria (CMAMMA). We sequenced the exome of an individual with CMAMMA and followed up with sequencing of eight additional affected individuals (cases). This included one individual who was identified and diagnosed by searching an exome database. We identify mutations in ACSF3, encoding a putative methylmalonyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA synthetase as a cause of CMAMMA. We also examined a canine model of CMAMMA, which showed pathogenic mutations in a predicted ACSF3 ortholog. ACSF3 mutant alleles occur with a minor allele frequency of 0.0058 in ∼1,000 control individuals, predicting a CMAMMA population incidence of ∼1:30,000. ACSF3 deficiency is the first human disorder identified as caused by mutations in a gene encoding a member of the acyl-CoA synthetase family, a diverse group of evolutionarily conserved proteins, and may emerge as one of the more common human metabolic disorders.

Download full-text


Available from: Jennifer J Johnston, Aug 11, 2015
  • Source
    • "Deficiency of ACSF3, encoding an acyl-CoA synthetase, results in combined malonic acid/methylmalonic acid excretion in urine (CMAMMA; MIM614265), but there was neither LA synthesis defect, nor lactic acidosis, nor glycine elevation noted (Alfares et al 2011; Sloan et al 2011). Even though this enzymatic step seems to play a role in mitochondrial fatty acid synthesis, there is probably a backup for malonyl-CoA synthesis in mitochondria (Witkowski et al 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lipoate is a covalently bound cofactor essential for five redox reactions in humans: in four 2-oxoacid dehydrogenases and the glycine cleavage system (GCS). Two enzymes are from the energy metabolism, α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase; and three are from the amino acid metabolism, branched-chain ketoacid dehydrogenase, 2-oxoadipate dehydrogenase, and the GCS. All these enzymes consist of multiple subunits and share a similar architecture. Lipoate synthesis in mitochondria involves mitochondrial fatty acid synthesis up to octanoyl-acyl-carrier protein; and three lipoate-specific steps, including octanoic acid transfer to glycine cleavage H protein by lipoyl(octanoyl) transferase 2 (putative) (LIPT2), lipoate synthesis by lipoic acid synthetase (LIAS), and lipoate transfer by lipoyltransferase 1 (LIPT1), which is necessary to lipoylate the E2 subunits of the 2-oxoacid dehydrogenases. The reduced form dihydrolipoate is reactivated by dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (DLD). Mutations in LIAS have been identified that result in a variant form of nonketotic hyperglycinemia with early-onset convulsions combined with a defect in mitochondrial energy metabolism with encephalopathy and cardiomyopathy. LIPT1 deficiency spares the GCS, and resulted in a combined 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase deficiency and early death in one patient and in a less severely affected individual with a Leigh-like phenotype. As LIAS is an iron-sulphur-cluster-dependent enzyme, a number of recently identified defects in mitochondrial iron-sulphur cluster synthesis, including NFU1, BOLA3, IBA57, GLRX5 presented with deficiency of LIAS and a LIAS-like phenotype. As in DLD deficiency, a broader clinical spectrum can be anticipated for lipoate synthesis defects depending on which of the affected enzymes is most rate limiting.
    Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease 04/2014; 37. DOI:10.1007/s10545-014-9705-8 · 4.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Although the program is designed to handle exome-scale data, genome-scale data can be viewed by pre-filtering the data file on individual genomic regions or annotation type. VarSifter has been used successfully to assist in the discovery of biologically important variants linked with human disease (Lindhurst et al., 2011; Sloan et al., 2011; Wei et al., 2011). Overall, this tool will allow groups without dedicated bioinformatics resources to interpret and analyze variation data. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: VarSifter is a graphical software tool for desktop computers that allows investigators of varying computational skills to easily and quickly sort, filter, and sift through sequence variation data. A variety of filters and a custom query framework allow filtering based on any combination of sample and annotation information. By simplifying visualization and analyses of exome-scale sequence variation data, this program will help bring the power and promise of massively-parallel DNA sequencing to a broader group of researchers. Availability and Implementation: VarSifter is written in Java, and is freely available in source and binary versions, along with a User Guide, at Contact: mullikin{at} Supplementary Information: Additional figures and methods available online at the journal's website.
    Bioinformatics 12/2011; 28(4):599-600. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr711 · 4.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Accurate calling of SNPs and genotypes from next-generation sequencing data is an essential prerequisite for most human genetics studies. A number of computational steps are required or recommended when translating the raw sequencing data into the final calls. However, whether each step does contribute to the performance of variant calling and how it affects the accuracy still remain unclear, making it difficult to select and arrange appropriate steps to derive high quality variants from different sequencing data. In this study, we made a systematic assessment of the relative contribution of each step to the accuracy of variant calling from Illumina DNA sequencing data. Results We found that the read preprocessing step did not improve the accuracy of variant calling, contrary to the general expectation. Although trimming off low-quality tails helped align more reads, it introduced lots of false positives. The ability of markup duplication, local realignment and recalibration, to help eliminate false positive variants depended on the sequencing depth. Rearranging these steps did not affect the results. The relative performance of three popular multi-sample SNP callers, SAMtools, GATK, and GlfMultiples, also varied with the sequencing depth. Conclusions Our findings clarify the necessity and effectiveness of computational steps for improving the accuracy of SNP and genotype calls from Illumina sequencing data and can serve as a general guideline for choosing SNP calling strategies for data with different coverage.
    BMC Genomics 12/2012; 13(8). DOI:10.1186/1471-2164-13-S8-S8 · 4.04 Impact Factor
Show more