Default mode network functional and structural connectivity after traumatic brain injury

The Hammersmith Hospital, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Brain (Impact Factor: 10.23). 08/2011; 134(Pt 8):2233-47. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr175
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Traumatic brain injury often results in cognitive impairments that limit recovery. The underlying pathophysiology of these impairments is uncertain, which restricts clinical assessment and management. Here, we use magnetic resonance imaging to test the hypotheses that: (i) traumatic brain injury results in abnormalities of functional connectivity within key cognitive networks; (ii) these changes are correlated with cognitive performance; and (iii) functional connectivity within these networks is influenced by underlying changes in structural connectivity produced by diffuse axonal injury. We studied 20 patients in the chronic phase after traumatic brain injury compared with age-matched controls. Network function was investigated in detail using functional magnetic resonance imaging to analyse both regional brain activation, and the interaction of brain regions within a network (functional connectivity). We studied patients during performance of a simple choice-reaction task and at 'rest'. Since functional connectivity reflects underlying structural connectivity, diffusion tensor imaging was used to quantify axonal injury, and test whether structural damage correlated with functional change. The patient group showed typical impairments in information processing and attention, when compared with age-matched controls. Patients were able to perform the task accurately, but showed slow and variable responses. Brain regions activated by the task were similar between the groups, but patients showed greater deactivation within the default mode network, in keeping with an increased cognitive load. A multivariate analysis of 'resting' state functional magnetic resonance imaging was then used to investigate whether changes in network function were present in the absence of explicit task performance. Overall, default mode network functional connectivity was increased in the patient group. Patients with the highest functional connectivity had the least cognitive impairment. In addition, functional connectivity at rest also predicted patterns of brain activation during later performance of the task. As expected, patients showed widespread white matter damage compared with controls. Lower default mode network functional connectivity was seen in those patients with more evidence of diffuse axonal injury within the adjacent corpus callosum. Taken together, our results demonstrate altered patterns of functional connectivity in cognitive networks following injury. The results support a direct relationship between white matter organization within the brain's structural core, functional connectivity within the default mode network and cognitive function following brain injury. They can be explained by two related changes: a compensatory increase in functional connectivity within the default mode network; and a variable degree of structural disconnection that modulates this change in network function.

Download full-text


Available from: Robert Leech, Feb 19, 2014
  • Source
    • "Though TBI is acquired rather than developmental, it has some shared characteristics with ADHD and has been associated with measures of cognitive inefficiency. Specifically, both have been associated with slower processing speed (Hervey et al., 2004; Holdnack et al., 1995; Katz et al., 2011; Sharp et al., 2011); reduced white matter tract integrity according to diffusion tensor imaging with structural magnetic resonance imaging MRI (Hellyer et al., 2013; Konrad et al., 2010; Konrad and Eickhoff, 2010; Silk et al., 2009); and abnormal functional network connectivity using functional MRI (Castellanos and Proal, 2012; Sharp et al., 2011). Given these similarities and the reliance that allocentric memory has on multiple structures, it certainly seemed reasonable to expect that this type of visual memory may be lower among ADHD subjects. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has often been conceptualized as arising executive dysfunctions (e.g., inattention, defective inhibition). However, recent studies suggested that cognitive inefficiency may underlie many ADHD symptoms, according to reaction time and processing speed abnormalities. This study explored whether a non-timed measure of cognitive inefficiency would also be abnormal. A sample of 23 ADHD subjects was compared to 23 controls on a test that included both egocentric and allocentric visual memory subtests. A factor analysis was used to determine which cognitive variables contributed to allocentric visual memory. The ADHD sample performed significantly lower on the allocentric but not egocentric conditions. Allocentric visual memory was not associated with timed, working memory, visual perception, or mental rotation variables. This paper concluded by discussing how these results supported a cognitive inefficiency explanation for some ADHD symptoms, and discussed future research directions. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    06/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.04.051
  • Source
    • "This finding potentially supports the idea that a frontoparietal control system could balance the competition between the task-negative network and task-positive network (Spreng et al., 2010; Gao and Lin, 2012; Buckner et al., 2014). Mediation of this competition relationship potentially benefits the clinical treatment of many brain disorders, such as traumatic brain injury (Mayer et al., 2011; Sharp et al., 2011). Thus, the connectivity of the lFPN in motor feedback deserves further attention in future explorations. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Motor feedback usually engages distinct sensory and cognitive processes based on different feedback conditions, e.g., the real and sham feedbacks. It was thought that these processes may rely on the functional connectivity among the brain networks. However, it remains unclear whether there is a difference in the network connectivity between the two feedback conditions. To address this issue, we carried out a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study by employing a new paradigm, i.e., continuous feedback (8 min) of finger force. Using independent component analysis and functional connectivity analysis, we found that as compared with the sham feedback, the real feedback recruited stronger negative connectivity between the executive network (EN) and the posterior default mode network (pDMN). More intriguingly, the left frontal parietal network (lFPN) exhibits positive connectivity with the pDMN in the real feedback while in the sham feedback, the lFPN shows connectivity with the EN. These results suggest that the connectivity among EN, pDMN, lFPN could differ depending on the real and sham feedbacks, and the lFPN may balance the competition between the pDMN and EN, thus supporting the sensory and cognitive processes of the motor feedback.
    Neuroscience 03/2015; 289. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.12.075 · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Conflicting results have been obtained by previous studies on DMN alterations after mTBI, with reduced DMN connectivity seen at rest (Mayer et al. 2011; Johnson et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2012), but both lower (Bonnelle et al. 2012; Mayer et al. 2012) and higher task-induced DMN deactivation (Sharp et al. 2011). However, only the study which found greater task-induced deactivation investigated performance in chronic TBI (Sharp et al. 2011). Furthermore, a negative association between PCS symptom report and lower BOLD response in DMN-related areas has been found previously in participants performing the n-Back task (Pardini et al. 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Persistent postconcussion syndrome (PCS) occurs in around 5-10% of individuals after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), but research into the underlying biology of these ongoing symptoms is limited and inconsistent. One reason for this could be the heterogeneity inherent to mTBI, with individualized injury mechanisms and psychological factors. A multimodal imaging study may be able to characterize the injury better. To look at the relationship between functional (fMRI), structural (diffusion tensor imaging), and metabolic (magnetic resonance spectroscopy) data in the same participants in the long term (>1 year) after injury. It was hypothesized that only those mTBI participants with persistent PCS would show functional changes, and that these changes would be related to reduced structural integrity and altered metabolite concentrations. Functional changes associated with persistent PCS after mTBI (>1 year postinjury) were investigated in participants with and without PCS (both n = 8) and non-head injured participants (n = 9) during performance of working memory and attention/processing speed tasks. Correlation analyses were performed to look at the relationship between the functional data and structural and metabolic alterations in the same participants. There were no behavioral differences between the groups, but participants with greater PCS symptoms exhibited greater activation in attention-related areas (anterior cingulate), along with reduced activation in temporal, default mode network, and working memory areas (left prefrontal) as cognitive load was increased from the easiest to the most difficult task. Functional changes in these areas correlated with reduced structural integrity in corpus callosum and anterior white matter, and reduced creatine concentration in right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These data suggest that the top-down attentional regulation and deactivation of task-irrelevant areas may be compensating for the reduction in working memory capacity and variation in white matter transmission caused by the structural and metabolic changes after injury. This may in turn be contributing to secondary PCS symptoms such as fatigue and headache. Further research is required using multimodal data to investigate the mechanisms of injury after mTBI, but also to aid individualized diagnosis and prognosis.
    Brain and Behavior 01/2015; 5(1):45-61. DOI:10.1002/brb3.292
Show more