Patient–physician social concordance, medical visit communication and patients’ perceptions of health care quality

Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Patient Education and Counseling (Impact Factor: 2.2). 08/2011; 85(3):e201-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.015
Source: PubMed


Social characteristics (e.g. race, gender, age, education) are associated with health care disparities. We introduce social concordance, a composite measure of shared social characteristics between patients and physicians.
To determine whether social concordance predicts differences in medical visit communication and patients' perceptions of care.
Regression analyses were used to determine the association of patient-provider social concordance with medical visit communication and patients' perceptions of care using data from two observational studies involving 64 primary care physicians and 489 of their patients from the Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC/Northern Virginia area.
Lower patient-physician social concordance was associated with less positive patient perceptions of care and lower positive patient affect. Patient-physician dyads with low vs. high social concordance reported lower ratings of global satisfaction with office visits (OR=0.64 vs. OR=1.37, p=0.036) and were less likely to recommend their physician to a friend (OR=0.61 vs. OR=1.37, p=0.035). A graded-response was observed for social concordance with patient positive affect and patient perceptions of care.
Patient-physician concordance across multiple social characteristics may have cumulative effects on patient-physician communication and perceptions of care.
Research should move beyond one-dimensional measures of patient-physician concordance to understand how multiple social characteristics influence health care quality.

Download full-text


Available from: Rachel L Johnson Thornton, Feb 25, 2014
  • Source
    • "Doctors who are explanatory, show support and respect for the patient, and enable the patient's participation in care generally have patients who are more satisfied, are more compliant to treatment regimens, and experience better health following the consultation [20]. In addition, doctors' expressions of positive affect consistently predict more positive communication with their patients and better judgments (patients report being satisfied with care) [22]–[24]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several factors influence patients' trust, and trust influences the doctor-patient relationship. Recent literature has investigated the quality of the personal relationship and its dynamics by considering the role of communication and the elements that influence trust giving in the frame of general practitioner (GP) consultations. We analysed certain aspects of the interaction between patients and GPs to understand trust formation and maintenance by focusing on communication channels. The impact of socio-demographic variables in trust relationships was also evaluated. A cross-sectional design using concurrent mixed qualitative and quantitative research methods was employed. One hundred adults were involved in a semi-structured interview composed of both qualitative and quantitative items for descriptive and exploratory purposes. The study was conducted in six community-based departments adjacent to primary care clinics in Trento, Italy. The findings revealed that patients trusted their GP to a high extent by relying on simple signals that were based on the quality of the one-to-one communication and on behavioural and relational patterns. Patients inferred the ability of their GP by adopting simple heuristics based mainly on the so-called social "honest signals" rather than on content-dependent features. Furthermore, socio-demographic variables affected trust: less literate and elderly people tended to trust more. This study is unique in attempting to explore the role of simple signals in trust relationships within medical consultation: people shape trust and give meaning to their relationships through a powerful channel of communication that orbits not around words but around social relations. The findings have implications for both clinicians and researchers. For doctors, these results suggest a way of thinking about encounters with patients. For researchers, the findings underline the importance of analysing some new key factors around trust for future investigations in medical practice and education.
    PLoS ONE 03/2014; 9(3):e90941. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0090941 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This finding supports a growing body of evidence, which suggests that interpersonal factors that characterize the quality of the patient–physician relationship may be more important for addressing health disparities than patient–physician racial matching (as defined as a biological construct) (Street et al. 2008; Meghani et al. 2009; Martin and Cooper 2013). For example, recent research has demonstrated that perceptions of social concordance (Thornton et al. 2011) and personal similarity (Street et al. 2008) are more important predictors of patient positive affect, trust, satisfaction, and intention to adhere to treatment recommendations than racial identity. The current study corroborates these findings by demonstrating that patient trust in the physician was associated with better adherence for all patients, regardless of patient–physician racial/ethnic concordance. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: To examine the associations between racial/ethnic concordance and blood pressure (BP) control, and to determine whether patient trust and medication adherence mediate these associations. Design: Cross-sectional study of 723 hypertensive African-American and white patients receiving care from 205 white and African-American providers at 119 primary care clinics, from 2001 to 2005. Racial/ethnic concordance was characterized as dyads where both the patient and physician were of the same race/ethnicity; discordance occurred in dyads where the patient was African-American and the physician was white. Patient perceptions of trust and medication adherence were assessed with self-report measures. The BP readings were abstracted from patients' medical charts using standardized procedures. Results: Six hundred thirty-seven patients were in race/ethnic-concordant relationships; 86 were in race/ethnic-discordant relationships. Concordance had no association with BP control. White patients in race/ethnic-concordant relationships were more likely to report better adherence than African-American patients in race/ethnic-discordant relationships (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.61, p = 0.04). Little difference in adherence was found for African-American patients in race/ethnic-concordant vs. discordant relationships. Increasing trust was associated with significantly better adherence (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.31, p < 0.01) and a trend toward better BP control among all patients (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.63, p = 0.07). Conclusions: Patient trust may influence medication adherence and BP control regardless of patient-physician racial/ethnic composition.
    Ethnicity and Health 11/2013; 19(5). DOI:10.1080/13557858.2013.857764 · 1.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last decades, surgeons, researchers, and health administrators have been working hard to define standards for high-quality treatment and care in Surgery departments. However, it is unclear whether patients' perceptions of medical treatment and care are related and affected by surgeons' perceptions of their working conditions and job satisfaction. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction in relation to surgeons' working conditions. A cross-sectional survey with 120 patients and 109 surgeons working in Surgery hospital departments was performed. Surgeons completed a survey evaluating their working conditions and job satisfaction. Patients assessed quality of medical care and treatment and their satisfaction with being a patient in this department. Seventy percent of the patients were satisfied with performed surgeries and services in their department. Surgeons' job satisfaction and working conditions rated with moderate scores. Bivariate analyses showed correlations between patients' satisfaction and surgeons' job satisfaction and working conditions. Strongest correlations were found between kindness of medical staff, treatment outcome and overall patient satisfaction. This study demonstrates strong associations between surgeons' working conditions and patient satisfaction. Based on these findings, hospital managements should improve work organization, workload, and job resources to not only improve surgeons' job satisfaction but also quality of medical treatment and patient satisfaction in Surgery departments.
    Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery 05/2012; 397(6):973-82. DOI:10.1007/s00423-012-0963-3 · 2.19 Impact Factor
Show more