Differences in Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction between Eccentric and Concentric Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Patients with Preserved Systolic Function

Department of Integrated Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
The Journal of international medical research (Impact Factor: 1.44). 06/2011; 39(3):772-9. DOI: 10.1177/147323001103900309
Source: PubMed


Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) may be eccentric or concentric (2 × LV posterior wall thickness relative to LV end-diastolic dimension ≤ 0.42 or > 0.42, respectively). The LV diastolic function between age-matched hypertensive patients with eccentric and concentric LVH was compared in the present study. Echocardiography was used to measure LV mass index (LV mass/body surface area; LVMI) as an index of LVH. LV diastolic function was assessed by measurements of peak early transmitral flow velocity (E)/peak late transmitral flow velocity (A) (the E/A ratio), peak early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e') and the E/e' ratio. Although LVMI, E/A and e' did not differ between the two groups, E/e' was significantly higher (worse) in patients with concentric LVH (13.4 ± 5.4) than in those with eccentric LVH (11.1 ± 3.6). Among hypertensive patients with LVH, those with concentric LVH may, therefore, have more severe LV diastolic dysfunction than those with eccentric LVH even if their LVMIs, which reflect the degree of LVH, are similar.

Download full-text


Available from: Naohisa Hosomi, Oct 05, 2015
77 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and aim: Effects of Ramadan fasting on health are important. Its effects on arterial pulse pressure (PP), lipid profile and oxidative stress were characterized in hypertensives. Methods: PP, indices of lipid profile and oxidative stress were measured pre-, during and post-fasting in equal (40 each), sex- and age-matched groups (age 55 ± 5 years) of hypertensives (HT) and controls (C). Results: Fasting reduced PP significantly by 17.2% and insignificantly by 9.3% in the HT and C groups, respectively. Total cholesterol (TC) was lowered insignificantly by 11.7% and 4.7% in the HT and C patients, respectively. Triglycerides (TG) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were significantly lowered by: TG: 24.5% and 22.8%; MDA: 45.6% and 54.3%; while glutathione (GSH) elevated by 56.8% and 52.6% in the HT and C groups, respectively. High-density lipoproteins (HDL) were raised significantly by 33.3% and insignificantly by 6.7%, whereas low-density lipoproteins (LDL) decreased significantly by 17.7% and insignificantly by 4.0% in the HT and C groups, respectively. At 6 weeks post-fasting, MDA remained significantly lower than the pre-fasting level by 24.3% and 25.7%, and GSH higher by 30.2% and 26.3% in the HT and C groups, respectively, while PP and TC returned to pre-fasting values in both groups. The post-fasting, HDL was significantly higher by 20.3% and LDL lower by 12.0% than the fasting levels in the HT patients. Conclusion: Fasting improves PP and lipids profile and ameliorates oxidative stress in hypertensives.
    Blood pressure 09/2013; 23(3). DOI:10.3109/08037051.2013.836808 · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD) is a known predictor of poor cardiovascular outcomes. Although ECG LV hypertrophy (LVH) is strongly associated with LV systolic dysfunction and heart failure, the relation of LV DD to ECG LVH is unclear.MethodsECG LVH by Cornell product (CP) criteria was examined in a cohort of 185 patients who underwent both cardiac computed tomographic angiography and transthoracic echocardiography with complete evaluation of diastolic function. The presence of DD was determined via evaluation of mitral inflow velocities, tissue Doppler imaging, deceleration time, isovolumic relaxation time, pulmonary venous systolic: diastolic ratio, and left atrial enlargement.ResultsAmong the 185 patients (56% female, mean age 54.6 ± 15.6), 105 (57%) had DD. In univariate logistic regression analysis, patients in the upper quartile of CP (≥1595 mm·ms) had a >5-fold greater odds of DD (odds ratio [OR] 5.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2–11.7, P < 0.001). In alternative analyses treating CP as a continuous variable, each 1 SD increase in CP (664 mm·ms) was associated with an OR of 1.9 for DD (95% CI 1.3–2.7, P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusting for univariate predictors of DD, the highest quartile of CP remained associated with a 5.9-fold increased odds of DD (95% CI 2.3–15.4, P = 0.001), and each 1 SD of CP with a 1.7-fold increased odds of DD (95% CI 1.2–2.5, P = 0.005).ConclusionsCP LVH is a strong predictor of DD, even after adjustment for other potential risk factors and ECG variables.
    Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology 04/2014; 19(6). DOI:10.1111/anec.12166 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hypertension remains a major contributor to the global burden of disease. The measurement of blood pressure continues to have pitfalls related to both physiological aspects and acute variation. As the left ventricle (LV) remains one of the main target organs of hypertension, and echocardiographic measures of structure and function carry prognostic information in this setting, the development of a consensus position on the use of echocardiography in this setting is important. Recent developments in the assessment of LV hypertrophy and LV systolic and diastolic function have prompted the preparation of this document. The focus of this work is on the cardiovascular responses to hypertension rather than the diagnosis of secondary hypertension. Sections address the pathophysiology of the cardiac and vascular responses to hypertension, measurement of LV mass, geometry, and function, as well as effects of treatment. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This article has been co-published in the Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. All rights reserved. © The Author 2015.
    European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging 06/2015; 16(6):577-605. DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jev076 · 4.11 Impact Factor