Intranasal but not intravenous delivery of the adjuvant α-galactosylceramide permits repeated stimulation of natural killer T cells in the lung

University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Immunology, Houston, Texas 77054, USA.
European Journal of Immunology (Impact Factor: 4.52). 11/2011; 41(11):3312-22. DOI: 10.1002/eji.201041359
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Efficient induction of antigen-specific immunity is achieved by delivering multiple doses of vaccine formulated with appropriate adjuvants that can harness the benefits of innate immune mediators. The synthetic glycolipid α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer) is a potent activator of NKT cells, a major innate immune mediator cell type effective in inducing maturation of DCs for efficient presentation of co-administered antigens. However, systemic administration of α-GalCer results in NKT cell anergy in which the cells are unresponsive to subsequent doses of α-GalCer. We show here that α-GalCer delivered as an adjuvant by the intranasal route, as opposed to the intravenous route, enables repeated activation of NKT cells and DCs, resulting in efficient induction of cellular immune responses to co-administered antigens. We show evidence that after intranasal delivery,α-GalCer is selectively presented by DCs for the activation of NKT cells, not B cells. Furthermore, higher levels of PD-1 expression, a potential marker for functional exhaustion of the NKT cells when α-GalCer is delivered by the intravenous route, are not observed after intranasal delivery. These results support a mucosal route of delivery for the utility of α-GalCer as an adjuvant for vaccines, which often requires repeated dosing to achieve durable protective immunity.

Download full-text


Available from: Dapeng Zhou, Dec 18, 2014
  • Source
    • "Antigen-specific responses of CD4 + and CD8 + T lymphocytes isolated from cervical lymph nodes, lungs, and spleens of the immunized animals at different times post immunization were determined by IFN-␥ ELISpot assay as described previously [21] [22]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sublingual immunization with gp140 and αGalCer or CpG-ODN induces systemic and mucosal immunity.•Combination of both adjuvants significantly improves gp140-specific IgG and IgA antibody levels.•Combination of both adjuvants together induces significant neutralization of clade C SHIV.
    Vaccine 11/2014; 32(51). DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.051 · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Issues of environment and environmental health involve multiple interests regarding e.g. political, societal, economical, and public concerns represented by different kinds of organizations and individuals. Not surprisingly, stakeholder and public participation has become a major issue in environmental and environmental health policy and assessment. The need for participation has been discussed and reasoned by many, including environmental legislators around the world. In principle, participation is generally considered as desirable and the focus of most scholars and practitioners is on carrying out participation, and making participation more effective. In practice also doubts regarding the effectiveness and importance of participation exist among policy makers, assessors, and public, leading even to undermining participatory practices in policy making and assessment. There are many possible purposes for participation, and different possible models of interaction between assessment and policy. A solid conceptual understanding of the interrelations between participation, assessment, and policy making is necessary in order to design and implement effective participatory practices. In this paper we ask, do current common conceptions of assessment, policy making and participation provide a sufficient framework for achieving effective participation? This question is addresses by reviewing the range of approaches to participation in assessment and policy making upon issues of environment and environmental health and some related insights from recent research projects, INTARESE and BENERIS. Openness, considered e.g. in terms of a) scope of participation, b) access to information, c) scope of contribution, d) timing of openness, and e) impact of contribution, provides a new perspective to the relationships between participation, assessment and policy making. Participation, assessment, and policy making form an inherently intertwined complex with interrelated objectives and outcomes. Based on experiences from implementing openness, we suggest complete openness as the new default, deviation from which should be explicitly argued, in assessment and policy making upon issues of environment and environmental health. Openness does not undermine the existing participatory models and techniques, but provides conceptual means for their more effective application, and opens up avenues for developing new kinds of effective participatory practices that aim for societal development through collaborative creation of knowledge.
    Environmental Health 06/2011; 10:58. DOI:10.1186/1476-069X-10-58 · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • Immunotherapy 01/2012; 4(1):19. DOI:10.2217/imt.11.152 · 2.44 Impact Factor
Show more