Article

The Trauma Survivors Network: Survive. Connect. Rebuild.

Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
The Journal of trauma (Impact Factor: 2.96). 06/2011; 70(6):1557-60. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182196e7e
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite substantial improvements in trauma care, severe injuries often result in significant long-term consequences for otherwise young, healthy individuals. Providing patient-centered care and extensive psychosocial support services is difficult for trauma centers.
In collaboration with researchers and clinicians, the American Trauma Society has developed the Trauma Survivors Network, a program incorporating self-management, peer support, timely access to information, and online social networking.
Individually, these components have been proven effective in improving outcomes and quality of life and are widely used in nontrauma settings. To date, 70 representatives from 30 trauma centers have participated in training sessions conducted by the American Trauma Society.
The Trauma Survivors Network provides a critical component of trauma care that can be adapted for local needs throughout the country. Implementation of these services is a necessary step in the development of comprehensive trauma systems that not only save lives but also reduce long-term disability among survivors.

0 Followers
 · 
157 Views
 · 
0 Downloads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Trauma Survivors Network is a multimodal program for trauma patients and their families. Despite training representatives of 30 trauma centers, only 3 have fully implemented the program. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to program implementation among trainees through in-depth phone interviews and an electronic survey. Although interviewees were positive about the Trauma Survivors Network concept, they identified numerous barriers to implementation. Trainee confidence in their ability to implement program components was predictive of their success. We recommend that future trainings include program advocacy, implementation skills, and an assessment of trainees' roles in the hospital.
    Journal of trauma nursing: the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses 01/2013; 20(2):89-99. DOI:10.1097/JTN.0b013e3182960057
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Restoration of lower limb function following severe injury is a challenge. Rehabilitation must take into account psychosocial factors and patient self-efficacy as well as functional goals. The Return to Run clinical pathway, an integrated orthotic and rehabilitation initiative, is an example of goal-oriented rehabilitation with periodic assessment aimed at restoring wounded warriors to high-level performance following severe lower extremity trauma. Objective assessment measures of surgical and rehabilitation interventions are lacking for persons with high-level performance demands, such as those required by service members. Thus, the Military Performance Laboratory at the Center for the Intrepid has established normative data for several physical performance measures, some of which are now routinely used to assess service members with severe lower extremity trauma. Patient expectations of treatment and rehabilitation are high and must be met to avoid poor outcomes attributed to nonanatomic factors.
    The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 08/2012; 20 Suppl 1:S39-41. DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-20-08-S39 · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Trauma Survivors Network (TSN), a program developed to help patients and families manage the psychosocial impact of their injuries, combines information access, self-management training, peer support, and online social networking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the TSN in improving patient reported outcomes among orthopedic trauma patients at a Level I trauma center. We prospectively enrolled 251 patients with either severe lower-extremity injuries or polytrauma in two cohorts: one group (n = 125) before implementation of the TSN and one group (n = 126) after implementation. Participants were interviewed during their initial hospital stay and at 6 months. Outcomes evaluated at 6 months included depression, anxiety, self-efficacy, health status, and patient activation. Participation in the individual components of the TSN was low, ranging between 3% for the NextSteps self-management program and 27% for receipt of the Patient and Family Handbook. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups in self-efficacy, anxiety, health status, or activation. There were statistically significant differences in depression (24% of patients with probable depression in the TSN group vs. 40% in the control group, p = 0.02). However, the groups were not balanced with respect to sex, education, and baseline social support. After controlling for these differences, the TSN group still had 49% lower odds (95% confidence interval, 0% to 74%) of depression (p = 0.05). The TSN represents a potentially important step toward the development of comprehensive psychosocial support programs for trauma survivors. Despite improvements in one important outcome, a key finding of this evaluation is the low rate of use of program components. This finding highlights the need for greater understanding of use barriers and efforts to increase adoption. Therapeutic study, level IV.
    06/2013; 74(6):1534-40. DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182921606
Show more