The Trauma Survivors Network: Survive. Connect. Rebuild.

Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
The Journal of trauma (Impact Factor: 2.96). 06/2011; 70(6):1557-60. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182196e7e
Source: PubMed


Despite substantial improvements in trauma care, severe injuries often result in significant long-term consequences for otherwise young, healthy individuals. Providing patient-centered care and extensive psychosocial support services is difficult for trauma centers.
In collaboration with researchers and clinicians, the American Trauma Society has developed the Trauma Survivors Network, a program incorporating self-management, peer support, timely access to information, and online social networking.
Individually, these components have been proven effective in improving outcomes and quality of life and are widely used in nontrauma settings. To date, 70 representatives from 30 trauma centers have participated in training sessions conducted by the American Trauma Society.
The Trauma Survivors Network provides a critical component of trauma care that can be adapted for local needs throughout the country. Implementation of these services is a necessary step in the development of comprehensive trauma systems that not only save lives but also reduce long-term disability among survivors.

10 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) constitute the gold standard for the generation of evidence-based medicine, but may not always be feasible. Furthermore, randomization alone does not guarantee the utility of the research, as evidenced by thousands of uninformative RCTs documented in the literature. Observational studies, including longitudinal, retrospective, and case-control designs, can contribute to the body of evidence in meaningful ways, provide useful information when an RCT is unethical or not feasible, generate hypotheses for RCTs, or provide preliminary work to better inform design of future RCTs. They can also be used to study rare outcomes, risk factors, and side effects, and to examine whether results from RCTs translate into effective treatment in routine practice. Use of modern statistical techniques, both in the study design and in the analysis stage, can improve the usefulness of the evidence obtained from observational studies.
    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 07/2012; 94 Suppl 1(Suppl 1(E)):112-7. DOI:10.2106/JBJS.L.00242 · 5.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Restoration of lower limb function following severe injury is a challenge. Rehabilitation must take into account psychosocial factors and patient self-efficacy as well as functional goals. The Return to Run clinical pathway, an integrated orthotic and rehabilitation initiative, is an example of goal-oriented rehabilitation with periodic assessment aimed at restoring wounded warriors to high-level performance following severe lower extremity trauma. Objective assessment measures of surgical and rehabilitation interventions are lacking for persons with high-level performance demands, such as those required by service members. Thus, the Military Performance Laboratory at the Center for the Intrepid has established normative data for several physical performance measures, some of which are now routinely used to assess service members with severe lower extremity trauma. Patient expectations of treatment and rehabilitation are high and must be met to avoid poor outcomes attributed to nonanatomic factors.
    The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 08/2012; 20 Suppl 1(suppl):S39-41. DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-20-08-S39 · 2.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Trauma Survivors Network is a multimodal program for trauma patients and their families. Despite training representatives of 30 trauma centers, only 3 have fully implemented the program. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to program implementation among trainees through in-depth phone interviews and an electronic survey. Although interviewees were positive about the Trauma Survivors Network concept, they identified numerous barriers to implementation. Trainee confidence in their ability to implement program components was predictive of their success. We recommend that future trainings include program advocacy, implementation skills, and an assessment of trainees' roles in the hospital.
    Journal of trauma nursing: the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses 05/2013; 20(2):89-99. DOI:10.1097/JTN.0b013e3182960057
Show more