Article

A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study.

Department of Conservative Dentistry, VSPM's Dental College and Research Centre Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
The journal of advanced prosthodontics 06/2011; 3(2):90-5. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.90
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare the fracture resistance and the mode of failure of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-core systems.
Root canal treatment was performed on 40 maxillary incisors and the samples were divided into four groups of 10 each. For three experimental groups post space preparation was done and teeth were restored with cast post-core (Group B), stainless steel post with composite core (Group C) and glass fiber post with composite core using adhesive resin cement (Group D). Control group (A) samples were selected with intact coronal structure. All the samples were prepared for ideal abutment preparation. All the samples were subjected to a load of 0.5 mm/min at 130° until fracture occurred using the universal testing machine. The fracture resistance was measured and the data were analyzed statistically. The fracture above the embedded resin was considered to be favorable and the fracture below the level was considered as unfavorable. The statistical analysis of fracture resistance between different groups was carried out with t-test. For the mode of failure the statistical analysis was carried out by Kruskal-Wallis test and Chi-Square test.
For experimental group Vs control group the fracture resistance values showed significant differences (P<.05). For the mode of failure the chi-square value is 16.1610, which means highly significant (P=.0009) statistically.
Endodontically treated teeth without post core system showed the least fracture resistance demonstrating the need to reinforce the tooth. Stainless steel post with composite core showed the highest fracture resistance among all the experimental groups. Teeth restored with the Glass fiber post showed the most favorable fractures making them more amenable to the re-treatment.

1 Bookmark
 · 
175 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of phosphoric acid etching and the dentin pre-treatment with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on the push-out bond strength between fiber post and root canal dentin. Root canals of 48 human incisors were selected, post spaces were prepared and assigned to four groups: G1-37% phosphoric acid (15 s); G2-5.25% NaOCl (2 min) +37% phosphoric acid (15 s); G3-37% phosphoric acid (60 s); and G4-5.25% NaOCl (2 min) +37% phosphoric acid (60 s). Fiber post cementation was performed with two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system/dual-cured resin cement according to the manufacturer's recommendation. After 24 h, each root was sectioned transversally into three slices (cervical, middle and apical) and the bond strength of each section was determined using a push-out bond strength test. Morphology analysis of the bonded interface was evaluated using a scanning electron microscopy. Push-out strength data (MPa) were analyzed by Analysis of Variance and Tukey-Kramer (α = 0.05). Considering the NaOCl pre-treatment, no statistically significant differences were observed among groups; however, when the phosphoric acid was applied during 60 s in the apical portion without NaOCl pre-treatment, the bond strength was statistically significant increased. The NaOCl pre-treatment did not improve the bond strength of adhesive luting cement to root canal dentin. The findings suggest that the use of 37% phosphoric acid for 60 s may have a beneficial effect on bond strength in the apical root third.
    Contemporary clinical dentistry. 01/2013; 4(4):443-447.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to evaluate by micro-computerized tomography (microCT) areas and volumes of post, cement, and voids/bubbles in the post space of oval-shaped premolars restored either with oval or circular posts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve extracted premolars were divided into two groups according to the drill-fiber post system used: (1) GC Fiber Post Drill + circular post GC Fiber Post; (2) Ellipson tip(TM) + oval post Ellipson post(TM). Each tooth was scanned using microCT, and areas and volumes of canal, post space, post, cement, and voids at coronal, medium, and apical level were calculated by using a three-dimensional visualization software. Two-way analyses of variance and Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The area of voids was significantly greater at apical level of oval posts, but no difference was found between the levels among the groups. Regardless of post shape, the volume of voids and of cement was significantly higher at the coronal level. With oval posts, the total volume of cement was twice as much as with circular posts, and the difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the volume of voids does not depend on post shape. Moreover, the microCT analysis demonstrated that the volume of cement was greater with oval posts compared to circular posts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The microCT analysis provided interesting information on voids distribution and on the ratio between post shape and cement thickness. These results might address the clinician in the reconstruction of teeth with fiber posts.
    Clinical Oral Investigations 04/2013; · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: No previous study has tested the strength of teeth restored with a fiber post inside the root canal combined with a ribbon fiber in the crown surrounding the post. The aim of this study was to compare a new adhesive technique to other conventional techniques in the fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars. Fifty superior premolars were divided into 5 groups (n=10), prepared as follows: Intact teeth used in G1 as control; in the other experimental groups (G2, G3, G4 and G5), mesio-occlusal-distal cavities were prepared, extending toward the palatal cups (MODP), and root canal treatments were performed. Groups were restored by varying the restorative technique: G2–only with composite resin (CR); G3–fiber post+CR; G4- polyethylene fiber (Ribbond)+CR; and G5, Fiber post+Ribbond+CR. The teeth were thermocycled 1000 times. After 24 h, the specimens were loaded in a universal testing machine until fracture, and the failure mode was checked. ANOVA and Tukey-Krammer tests were used for statistical analysis (α=0.05). Results: The fracture strength (N) of control (G1- 410.7±106.9) was not significantly different (P>0.05) from Ribbond+CR (G4- 300.7±80.2) and Fiber post+Ribbond+CR (G5- 377.5±107.7). Specimens restored only with CR (G2- 177.7±52.1) and fiber post+CR (G3- 264.6±88.5) were statistically similar (P>0.05), but both had their mean values differed from the control (P<0.05). Longitudinal and oblique crown fractures were predominant in all groups. Ribbon-fiber reinforced resin restorations provided superior fracture resistance of premolars with MODP and endodontic access cavities when compared to conventional direct techniques.
    International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 01/2014; · 1.30 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
38 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014