Article

Comparison of LED and conventional fluorescence microscopy for detection of acid fast bacilli in a low-incidence setting.

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 07/2011; 6(7):e22495. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022495
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Light emitting diode fluorescence microscopes have many practical advantages over conventional mercury vapour fluorescence microscopes, which would make them the preferred choice for laboratories in both low- and high-resource settings, provided performance is equivalent.
In a nested case-control study, we compared diagnostic accuracy and time required to read slides with the Zeiss PrimoStar iLED, LW Scientific Lumin, and a conventional fluorescence microscope (Leica DMLS). Mycobacterial culture was used as the reference standard, and subgroup analysis by specimen source and organism isolated were performed.
There was no difference in sensitivity or specificity between the three microscopes, and agreement was high for all comparisons and subgroups. The Lumin and the conventional fluorescence microscope were equivalent with respect to time required to read smears, but the Zeiss iLED was significantly time saving compared to both.
Light emitting diode microscopy should be considered by all tuberculosis diagnostic laboratories, including those in high income countries, as a replacement for conventional fluorescence microscopes. Our findings provide support to the recent World Health Organization policy recommending that conventional fluorescence microscopy be replaced by light emitting diode microscopy using auramine staining in all settings where fluorescence microscopy is currently used.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
181 Views
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: SUMMARY: Rapid, affordable and accurate tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis is key to effective patient management and global TB control. Effective clinical screening and optimised sample acquisition methods remain the first steps in the diagnostic process. Smear microscopy, despite optimisation, remains widely used even though its sensitivity is poor. Mycobacterial liquid culture is accurate but poorly accessible. The use of novel molecular tools, such as Xpert1 MTB/RIF (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) or GenoType1 MTBDRplus (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany) assays, which offer superior diagnostic accuracy and decreased time-to-diagnosis for drug- sensitive and/or -resistant TB, is increasing following World Health Organization (WHO) endorsement and, in some countries, national roll-out is underway. In contrast, both serology (antibody-detection tests) and interferon-><c release assays (IGRAs) have been found to offer little diagnostic utility for active TB diagnosis and have been discouraged by WHO. IGRAs and the tuberculin skin test (TST) remain important tools for latent TB infection (LTBI) diagnosis, with numerous guidelines available, although recent studies have highlighted their limitations in predicting progression to active disease. Other novel, simple technologies, such as the point-of-care (POC) urine lipoarabinomannan strip test and the visually read loop isothermal amplification PCR nucleic acid amplification technique (NAAT), although of uncertain and restricted clinical utility, highlight the progression toward an inexpensive, instrument-free, laboratory-free POC diagnostic technology for TB in the future.
    European Respiratory Monograph, 2012 01/2012: chapter 10; , ISBN: 1025-448x
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An urgent question that needs to be addressed rapidly by the mycobacteriology laboratory is whether Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex or NTM is involved. NAA assays are excellent tools for the purpose, and can be used directly on the clinical specimens of patients suspected of having mycobacterial disease, allowing same-day reporting of results. The CDC recommends using both liquid and solid media for growth detection of mycobacteria to decrease the time to detection and to increase the yield of growth detection. DNA sequencing of variable genomic regions offers a rapid, accurate, and relatively inexpensive method for the identification of mycobacteria.
    Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 06/2014; 34(2):271–295. · 1.35 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
58 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014