Article

My PQI project--medical legal issues with outside trauma studies: are you opening yourself up to liability?

Medical College of Wisconsin Affiliated Hospitals, Department of Radiology, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR 08/2011; 8(8):528-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.04.016
Source: PubMed
0 Bookmarks
 · 
36 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients transferred for higher levels of care often arrive with medical imaging from the outside facility, with or without accompanying radiology reports. The handling of pretransfer studies by receiving radiologists introduces several concerns regarding resource utilization, medicolegal risk, and technical quality control. The authors review the current status of transfer patient imaging, with an emphasis on the role of the receiving emergency radiologist. Practice solutions developed at the authors' level I trauma center are described.
    Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR 02/2013;
  • Source
    Journal of the American College of Radiology. 01/2013; in press.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to establish practice patterns of radiology residents in regards to interpretation and reporting of outside studies for transferred patients. We performed a national survey of radiology residency chief residents, administered by email through the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR). There were 81 chief resident respondents, representing 42.8 % of 187 total Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved radiology residency training programs in the USA. In 97.5 % of programs, residents perform interpretations of outside studies. Up to 76.7 % of respondents state that when outside studies are reviewed by residents, an original report is available in less than one quarter of cases. While 55.1 % of respondents state that there is a mechanism for recording their findings and impressions for outside studies, only 32.1 % are aware of a policy requiring documentation. Of the respondents, 42.3 % report they have no means for documenting their findings and impressions on outside studies. Further, 65.4 % state that there is no policy requiring an attending to review and document agreement with their interpretation of outside studies. There is wide institutional variation in both policy and practice regarding reinterpretation of outside studies for patients transferred to academic hospitals. While the majority of radiology residents are providing the service of reinterpreting outside studies, only a minority of residency programs have a policy requiring (1) documentation of their impressions or (2) attending oversight and documentation of discrepant opinions.
    Emergency Radiology 04/2014;