Does Better Quality of Care for Falls and Urinary Incontinence Result in Better Participant-Reported Outcomes?

Division of Geriatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Impact Factor: 4.57). 08/2011; 59(8):1435-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03517.x
Source: PubMed


To determine whether delivery of better quality of care for urinary incontinence (UI) and falls is associated with better participant-reported outcomes.
Retrospective cohort study.
Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders Study 2 (ACOVE-2).
Older (≥ 75) ambulatory care participants in ACOVE-2 who screened positive for UI (n = 133) or falls or fear of falling (n=328).
Composite quality scores (percentage of quality indicators (QIs) passed per participant) and change in Incontinence Quality of Life (IQOL, range 0-100) or Falls Efficacy Scale (FES, range 10-40) scores were measured before and after care was delivered (mean 10 months). Because the treatment-related falls QIs were measured only on patients who received a physical examination, an alternative Common Pathway QI (CPQI) score was developed that assigned a failing score for falls treatment to unexamined participants.
Each 10% increment in receipt of recommended care for UI was associated with a 1.4-point improvement in IQOL score (P = .01). The original falls composite quality-of-care score was unrelated to FES, but the new CPQI scoring method for falls quality of care was related to FES outcomes (+0.4 points per 10% increment in falls quality, P = .01).
Better quality of care for falls and UI was associated with measurable improvement in participant-reported outcomes in less than 1 year. The connection between process and outcome required consideration of the interdependence between diagnosis and treatment in the falls QIs. The link between process and outcome demonstrated for UI and falls underscores the importance of improving care in these areas.

Download full-text


Available from: Lillian Chiang Min, Feb 27, 2014
25 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Norway has a higher incidence of hip fractures than any other country. For older individuals, a hip fracture may cause dramatic changes in health status like incontinence and daily activities. Patients with hip fractures are at high risk of urinary incontinence (UI) after surgical repair. A urinary indwelling catheter (UIC) is inserted preoperatively, but should be removed within 24 hours. Our aims were to identify indicators that might predict clinical challenges related to urinary incontinence 1 year after hip fractures. Methods: Inclusion criteria were patients with hip fracture age 65 years or older. They were admitted form their own home to two acute-care hospitals during 2004–2006. We used the Resident Assessment Instrument for Acute Care. Results: A total of 331 patients were included. Thirty-five (11%) had UIC 72 hours after surgery. These patients had more frequently experienced delirium, urinary tract infection, cognitive impairment and discouragement than their counterparts. After 12 months, patients with previous UI had lower functioning levels than those with no previous UI. They had moved four times more frequently to a nursing home and had over twice the mortality. Conclusions: Patient with UI should be followed up with a multidisciplinary team after discharged from hospital.
    Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 09/2012; 27(3). DOI:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01075.x · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES), a screening tool for at-risk elderly, has been validated in the community. This study used VES-based criteria to develop a modified version that can be calculated from the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS) to identify Medicare members at high risk of mortality. Data were from 97,258 HOS respondents in 164 plans. Using age, self-rated health, and function items from the 2005 HOS, an a priori approach modeled on VES scoring and items predicted two-year mortality (c-statistic 0.74). Routinely-collected Medicare survey data may be used to assess patterns of enrollment of high-risk beneficiaries across health plans.
    The Journal of ambulatory care management 10/2012; 35(4):278-92. DOI:10.1097/JAC.0b013e3182674721
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To develop a means to measure the quality of care provided to women treated for urinary incontinence (UI) through the development of quality-of-care indicators (QIs). We performed an extensive literature review to develop a set of potential quality indicators for the management of UI. QIs were modeled after those previously described in the Assessing the Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) project. Nine experts ranked the indicators on a nine-point scale for both validity and feasibility. We analyzed preliminary rankings of each indicator using the RAND Appropriateness Method. A forum was then held in which each indicator was thoroughly discussed by the panelists as a group, after which the indicators were rated a second time individually using the same nine-point scale. QIs were developed that addressed screening, diagnosis, work-up, and both non-surgical and surgical management. Areas of controversy included whether routine screening for incontinence should be performed, whether urodynamics should be performed before non-surgical management is initiated, and whether cystoscopy should be part of the pre-operative work-up of uncomplicated stress incontinence. Following the expert panel discussion, 27 of 40 potential indicators were determined to be valid for UI with a median score of at least seven on a nine-point scale. We identified 27 quality indicators for the care of women with UI. Once these QIs are pilot-tested for feasibility, they will be applied on a larger scale to measure the quality of care provided to women with UI in the United States. Neurourol. Urodynam. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Neurourology and Urodynamics 11/2013; 32(8). DOI:10.1002/nau.22353 · 2.87 Impact Factor
Show more