Article

Effects of different elastic cord assistance levels on vertical jump.

Center for Sport Performance, Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton, California, USA.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (Impact Factor: 1.8). 07/2011; 25(12):3472-8. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318217664c
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Tran, TT, Brown, LE, Coburn, JW, Lynn, SK, Dabbs, NC, Schick, MK, Schick, EE, Khamoui, AV, Uribe, BP, and Noffal, GJ. Effects of different elastic cord assistance levels on vertical jump. J Strength Cond Res 25(12): 3472-3478, 2011-Currently, little research has been conducted using body weight reduction (BWR) as a means to enhance vertical jump. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of different elastic cord assistance levels on vertical jump height (JH), takeoff velocity (TOV), relative ground reaction force (rGRF), relative impact force (RIF), and descent velocity (DV). Thirty recreationally trained college men and women (M = 15, W = 15) completed 3 testing sessions consisting of 5 conditions: 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40% BWR. In all BWR conditions, the subjects wore a full body harness while being attached to 2 elastic cords suspended from the ceiling and a linear velocity transducer. They then performed 3 maximal countermovement jumps with arm swing on a force plate. The results indicated no interaction of condition by sex for any variable; however, there was a significant (p < 0.05) main effect for condition for each variable. The JH significantly increased across all conditions (0%: 43.73 ± 1.62 cm, 40%: 64.77 ± 2.36 cm). The TOV at 30% (2.73 ± 0.34 m·s) was significantly greater than that at 0% (2.59 ± 0.39 m·s) and 10% (2.63 ± 0.34 m·s), whereas that at 40% (2.79 ± 0.43 m·s) was significantly greater than that at >0, 10, and 20%. The rGRF at 30% (18.62 ± 4.35 N·kg) was significantly greater than that at >0, 10, and 20%, whereas that at 40% (21.38 ± 5.21 N·kg) was significantly greater than in all conditions. The RIF at 20, 30, and 40% (40%: 61.60 ± 18.53 N·kg) was significantly greater than that at 0% (44.46 ± 9.12 N·kg). The DV at 20% (2.61 ± 0.31 m·s) was significantly greater than at 10%, whereas those at 30 and 40% (2.8 ± 0.41 m·s) were significantly greater than at 0, 10, and 20%. These results demonstrate that using different elastic cord levels to reduce body weight appears effective for increasing ascent and descent force and velocity variables. Future research should investigate greater BWR% and chronic training.

1 Bookmark
 · 
241 Views
  • Source
    Strength and conditioning journal 12/2012; 34(6):34-43. · 0.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vertical jumping ability is a critical skill for success in many sports. Previous studies have reported conflicting results on the effects of heavy-load, light-load, contrast, or plyometric training to improve vertical jump height. A novel jump training method, using assistance via elastic cords or an absolute weight, has received little attention. These studies, using an overspeed paradigm, support assistance as an effective training method compared with free or overload jump training. However, there is a lack of investigation and standardization related to the critical assisted jump training variables of frequency, intensity (assistance level), volume, and rest. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to provide an overview of assisted jump training, associated variables, and potential benefits to enhance vertical jump height.
    Current Sports Medicine Reports 05/2012; 11(3):155-9. · 1.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Assisted jumping (an over-speed concept) is a method used to improve vertical jump performance. However, research is lacking on the optimal program design to maximize performance outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of rest intervals following assisted jumping on bodyweight vertical jumps. Twenty healthy recreationally trained males (age: 22.85 ± 1.84 yr, height: 179.44 ± 5.99 cm, mass: 81.73 ± 9.51 kg) attended five sessions. For all sessions, subjects performed the same dynamic warm up and then executed one set of five consecutive assisted jumps at 30% body weight reduction. They then rested for 30 seconds (C30), one (C1), two (C2), or four (C4) minutes, followed by three bodyweight jumps with no assistance. Baseline jump (CB) height was measured without preceding assisted jumps. ANOVA revealed a main effect for takeoff velocity, with one minute and four minutes being greater than baseline (C1: 3.36 ± .40 m/s, C4: 3.27 ± .41 m/s, CB: 3.13 ± .32 m/s). Relative peak power also demonstrated a main effect with one minute being greater than all other conditions (C1: 75.22 ± 10.83 W/kg). Jump height and relative ground reaction force demonstrated no differences between conditions. These results indicate over-speed jumping acutely enhances explosive body weight jumping velocity and power. This acute performance enhancement is probably due to increased motor neuron excitability and motor unit synchronization.
    The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 01/2013; 27(1):64-68. · 1.80 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
126 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014