Effects of different elastic cord assistance levels on vertical jump.

Center for Sport Performance, Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton, California, USA.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (Impact Factor: 1.8). 07/2011; 25(12):3472-8. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318217664c
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Tran, TT, Brown, LE, Coburn, JW, Lynn, SK, Dabbs, NC, Schick, MK, Schick, EE, Khamoui, AV, Uribe, BP, and Noffal, GJ. Effects of different elastic cord assistance levels on vertical jump. J Strength Cond Res 25(12): 3472-3478, 2011-Currently, little research has been conducted using body weight reduction (BWR) as a means to enhance vertical jump. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of different elastic cord assistance levels on vertical jump height (JH), takeoff velocity (TOV), relative ground reaction force (rGRF), relative impact force (RIF), and descent velocity (DV). Thirty recreationally trained college men and women (M = 15, W = 15) completed 3 testing sessions consisting of 5 conditions: 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40% BWR. In all BWR conditions, the subjects wore a full body harness while being attached to 2 elastic cords suspended from the ceiling and a linear velocity transducer. They then performed 3 maximal countermovement jumps with arm swing on a force plate. The results indicated no interaction of condition by sex for any variable; however, there was a significant (p < 0.05) main effect for condition for each variable. The JH significantly increased across all conditions (0%: 43.73 ± 1.62 cm, 40%: 64.77 ± 2.36 cm). The TOV at 30% (2.73 ± 0.34 m·s) was significantly greater than that at 0% (2.59 ± 0.39 m·s) and 10% (2.63 ± 0.34 m·s), whereas that at 40% (2.79 ± 0.43 m·s) was significantly greater than that at >0, 10, and 20%. The rGRF at 30% (18.62 ± 4.35 N·kg) was significantly greater than that at >0, 10, and 20%, whereas that at 40% (21.38 ± 5.21 N·kg) was significantly greater than in all conditions. The RIF at 20, 30, and 40% (40%: 61.60 ± 18.53 N·kg) was significantly greater than that at 0% (44.46 ± 9.12 N·kg). The DV at 20% (2.61 ± 0.31 m·s) was significantly greater than at 10%, whereas those at 30 and 40% (2.8 ± 0.41 m·s) were significantly greater than at 0, 10, and 20%. These results demonstrate that using different elastic cord levels to reduce body weight appears effective for increasing ascent and descent force and velocity variables. Future research should investigate greater BWR% and chronic training.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of assisted and traditional drop jumps on fast stretch-shortening cycle exercises in collegiate athletes. Participants were selected into one of three groups: 1) the assisted drop jump (n=11); the traditional drop jump (n=11); and 3) the control (n=11). The assisted drop jump training involved drop jumps (DJs) with assistance of tubing, whereas the traditional DJ training was performed without any assistance. Prior to and at the completion of 5-week training programs, DJs from heights of both 30 (DJ30) and 60 cm (DJ60) were conducted to determine jump height, drop jump reactivity coefficient, contact time and peak ground reaction force. Both the assisted DJ and traditional DJ training programs resulted in significant (p < 0.05) improvement in jump height, DJ reactivity coefficient and decreased contact time for DJ30. Although both the assisted DJ and traditional DJ modes also increased jump height and DJ reactivity coefficient for DJ60, an enhancement of the assisted DJ training in DJ reactivity coefficient was significantly greater compared to the traditional DJ training. In addition, the assisted DJ mode allowed for a significant reduction of ground reaction force, while the traditional DJ did not change the ground reaction force. The results of this study support the inclusion of assisted DJ training into jumping sports like basketball, volleyball, and track and field jumps. Our results further suggest that incorporating assisted DJ training may be appropriate for highly trained adult athletes due to jumping performance improvement and impact landing forces reduction simultaneously. Key words: Drop Jumps, Ground Reaction Force, Plyometric Training, Vertical Jump Reviewers: Loren Chiu (University of Alberta, Canada) Jeremy Sheppard
    International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching 12/2014; 9(5):1217-1225. · 0.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Strength and conditioning journal 12/2012; 34(6):34-43. · 0.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Assisted jumping (an over-speed concept) is a method used to improve vertical jump performance. However, research is lacking on the optimal program design to maximize performance outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of rest intervals following assisted jumping on bodyweight vertical jumps. Twenty healthy recreationally trained males (age: 22.85 ± 1.84 yr, height: 179.44 ± 5.99 cm, mass: 81.73 ± 9.51 kg) attended five sessions. For all sessions, subjects performed the same dynamic warm up and then executed one set of five consecutive assisted jumps at 30% body weight reduction. They then rested for 30 seconds (C30), one (C1), two (C2), or four (C4) minutes, followed by three bodyweight jumps with no assistance. Baseline jump (CB) height was measured without preceding assisted jumps. ANOVA revealed a main effect for takeoff velocity, with one minute and four minutes being greater than baseline (C1: 3.36 ± .40 m/s, C4: 3.27 ± .41 m/s, CB: 3.13 ± .32 m/s). Relative peak power also demonstrated a main effect with one minute being greater than all other conditions (C1: 75.22 ± 10.83 W/kg). Jump height and relative ground reaction force demonstrated no differences between conditions. These results indicate over-speed jumping acutely enhances explosive body weight jumping velocity and power. This acute performance enhancement is probably due to increased motor neuron excitability and motor unit synchronization.
    The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 01/2013; 27(1):64-68. · 1.80 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014