Effects of learning climate and registered nurse staffing on medication errors.

The Journal of nursing administration (Impact Factor: 1.37). 01/2011; 41(7-8 Suppl):S6-13. DOI: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e318221c213
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite increasing recognition of the significance of learning from errors, little is known about how learning climate contributes to error reduction.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether learning climate moderates the relationship between error-producing conditions and medication errors.
A cross-sectional descriptive study was done using data from 279 nursing units in 146 randomly selected hospitals in the United States. Error-producing conditions included work environment factors (work dynamics and nurse mix), team factors (communication with physicians and nurses' expertise), personal factors (nurses' education and experience), patient factors (age, health status, and previous hospitalization), and medication-related support services. Poisson models with random effects were used with the nursing unit as the unit of analysis.
A significant negative relationship was found between learning climate and medication errors. It also moderated the relationship between nurse mix and medication errors: When learning climate was negative, having more registered nurses was associated with fewer medication errors. However, no relationship was found between nurse mix and medication errors at either positive or average levels of learning climate. Learning climate did not moderate the relationship between work dynamics and medication errors.
The way nurse mix affects medication errors depends on the level of learning climate. Nursing units with fewer registered nurses and frequent medication errors should examine their learning climate. Future research should be focused on the role of learning climate as related to the relationships between nurse mix and medication errors.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Patient safety culture is an important factor in the effort to reduce adverse events in the hospital and improve patient safety. A few studies have shown the relationship between patient safety culture and adverse events, yet no such research has been reported in China. Objectives This study aimed to describe nurses perception of patient safety culture and frequencies of adverse events, and examine the relationship between them. Design This study was a descriptive, correlated study. Setting and Participants: We selected 28 inpatient units and emergency departments in 7 level-3 general hospitals from 5 districts in Guangzhou, China, and we surveyed 463 nurses. Methods The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was used to measure nurses perception of patient safety culture, and the frequencies of adverse events which happened frequently in hospital were estimated by nurses. We used multiple logistic regression models to examine the relationship between patient safety culture scores and estimated frequencies of each type of adverse event. Results The positive response rates of 12 dimensions of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture varied from 23.6% to 89.7%. There were 47.8%-75.6% nurses who estimated that these adverse events had happened in the past year. After controlling for all nurse related factors, a higher mean score of “Organizational Learning-Continuous Improvement” was significantly related to lower the occurrence of pressure ulcers (OR = 0.249), prolonged physical restraint (OR = 0.406), and complaints (OR = 0.369); a higher mean score of “Frequency of Event Reporting” was significantly related to lower the occurrence of medicine errors (OR = 0.699) and pressure ulcers (OR = 0.639). Conclusions The results confirmed the hypothesis that an improvement in patient safety culture was related to a decrease in the occurrence of adverse events.
    International journal of nursing studies 01/2013; 51(8). DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.12.007 · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Attention in the ward should shift from preventing medication administration errors to managing them. Nevertheless, little is known in regard with the practices nursing wards apply to learn from medication administration errors as a means of limiting them. To test the effectiveness of four types of learning practices, namely, non-integrated, integrated, supervisory and patchy learning practices in limiting medication administration errors. Data were collected from a convenient sample of 4 hospitals in Israel by multiple methods (observations and self-report questionnaires) at two time points. The sample included 76 wards (360 nurses). Medication administration error was defined as any deviation from prescribed medication processes and measured by a validated structured observation sheet. Wards' use of medication administration technologies, location of the medication station, and workload were observed; learning practices and demographics were measured by validated questionnaires. Results of the mixed linear model analysis indicated that the use of technology and quiet location of the medication cabinet were significantly associated with reduced medication administration errors (estimate=.03, p<.05 and estimate=-.17, p<.01 correspondently), while workload was significantly linked to inflated medication administration errors (estimate=.04, p<.05). Of the learning practices, supervisory learning was the only practice significantly linked to reduced medication administration errors (estimate=-.04, p<.05). Integrated and patchy learning were significantly linked to higher levels of medication administration errors (estimate=-.03, p<.05 and estimate=-.04, p<.01 correspondently). Non-integrated learning was not associated with it (p>.05). How wards manage errors might have implications for medication administration errors beyond the effects of typical individual, organizational and technology risk factors. Head nurse can facilitate learning from errors by "management by walking around" and monitoring nurses' medication administration behaviors.
    International journal of nursing studies 07/2013; 51(3). DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.06.010 · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite its place at the heart of inpatient medicine, the evidence base underpinning the effective delivery of medical ward care is highly fragmented. Clinicians familiar with the selection of evidence-supported treatments for specific diseases may be less aware of the evolving literature surrounding the organisation of care on the medical ward. This review is the first synthesis of that disparate literature. An iterative search identified relevant publications, using terms pertaining to medical ward environments, and objective and subjective patient outcomes. Articles (including reviews) were selected on the basis of their focus on medical wards, and their relevance to the quality and safety of ward-based care. Responses to medical ward failings are grouped into five common themes: staffing levels and team composition; interdisciplinary communication and collaboration; standardisation of care; early recognition and treatment of the deteriorating patient; and local safety climate. Interventions in these categories are likely to improve the quality and safety of care in medical wards, although the evidence supporting them is constrained by methodological limitations and inadequate investment in multicentre trials. Nonetheless, with infrequent opportunities to redefine their services, institutions are increasingly adopting multifaceted strategies that encompass groups of these themes. As the literature on the quality of inpatient care moves beyond its initial focus on the intensive care unit and operating theatre, physicians should be mindful of opportunities to incorporate evidence-based practice at a ward level.
    European Journal of Internal Medicine 11/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.ejim.2014.10.013 · 2.30 Impact Factor