Teledermatology via a Social Networking Web Site: A Pilot Study Between a General Hospital and a Rural Clinic

Department of Dermatology, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, Mexico.
Telemedicine and e-Health (Impact Factor: 1.67). 07/2011; 17(8):652-5. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0038
Source: PubMed


Teledermatology via a free public social networking Web site is a practical tool to provide attention to patients who do not have access to dermatologic care. In this pilot study, a general practitioner sent consults to a dermatology department at a general hospital via Facebook(®). Forty-four patients were seen and treatment was installed. We identified both simple-to-treat, common skin diseases and rare congenital diseases that require genetic counseling and more complex treatment. The majority of patients (75%) benefited with the diagnoses and treatments offered, thus avoiding unnecessary expenses or transportation to urban areas.

14 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chronic wounds (leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, etc.) constitute a real public health problem and engender high economic and human costs. Due to the declining physical and mental conditions of our elderly subjects and their rural environment, we created a computer program to assist with chronic wound management in elderly subjects living in retirement homes and to reduce the amount of ambulance transportation. Each participating establishment was provided with a digital camera and its own secure e-mail address in order to allow photographs to be sent anonymously. Patients with chronic wounds entailing treatment difficulties were included. Details were recorded of the number of tele-expertise consultations given, the chronic wound type, the number of hospitalizations or medical consultations, and the number of ambulance trips avoided. The project was evaluated at 1 year. Of the 40 establishments invited to take part, 22 agreed to do so but only the first 10 respondents were accepted for participation in the pilot feasibility study. Funding ("Health and social prize" provided by the Haute-Vienne region Social Security Office - CPAM) was used to purchase the cameras. Beginning on 15 April 2010, 10 establishments for the elderly sent photographs of 34 patients presenting 26 chronic wounds and tele-expertise was provided for 10 pressure ulcers, two diabetic feet and 14 leg ulcers. Over a two-year period, this program helped avoid 20 trips for patients and enabled rapid hospitalization of nine patients by the university hospital by optimizing chronic wound management for patients residing in establishments for the elderly.
    Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie 03/2013; 140(3):165-9. DOI:10.1016/j.annder.2012.11.008 · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is currently a lack of information about the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication among the general public, patients, and health professionals from primary research. To review the current published literature to identify the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication among the general public, patients, and health professionals, and identify current gaps in the literature to provide recommendations for future health communication research. This paper is a review using a systematic approach. A systematic search of the literature was conducted using nine electronic databases and manual searches to locate peer-reviewed studies published between January 2002 and February 2012. The search identified 98 original research studies that included the uses, benefits, and/or limitations of social media for health communication among the general public, patients, and health professionals. The methodological quality of the studies assessed using the Downs and Black instrument was low; this was mainly due to the fact that the vast majority of the studies in this review included limited methodologies and was mainly exploratory and descriptive in nature. Seven main uses of social media for health communication were identified, including focusing on increasing interactions with others, and facilitating, sharing, and obtaining health messages. The six key overarching benefits were identified as (1) increased interactions with others, (2) more available, shared, and tailored information, (3) increased accessibility and widening access to health information, (4) peer/social/emotional support, (5) public health surveillance, and (6) potential to influence health policy. Twelve limitations were identified, primarily consisting of quality concerns and lack of reliability, confidentiality, and privacy. Social media brings a new dimension to health care as it offers a medium to be used by the public, patients, and health professionals to communicate about health issues with the possibility of potentially improving health outcomes. Social media is a powerful tool, which offers collaboration between users and is a social interaction mechanism for a range of individuals. Although there are several benefits to the use of social media for health communication, the information exchanged needs to be monitored for quality and reliability, and the users' confidentiality and privacy need to be maintained. Eight gaps in the literature and key recommendations for future health communication research were provided. Examples of these recommendations include the need to determine the relative effectiveness of different types of social media for health communication using randomized control trials and to explore potential mechanisms for monitoring and enhancing the quality and reliability of health communication using social media. Further robust and comprehensive evaluation and review, using a range of methodologies, are required to establish whether social media improves health communication practice both in the short and long terms.
    Journal of Medical Internet Research 04/2013; 15(4):e85. DOI:10.2196/jmir.1933 · 3.43 Impact Factor

  • Circulation 04/2013; 127(13):1413-21. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.128017 · 14.43 Impact Factor
Show more