Defining health information technology-related errors: new developments since to err is human.
University of Texas–Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality & Safety, National Center for Cognitive Informatics and Decision Making, School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Journal Article: Archives of internal medicine (impact factor: 9.81). 07/2011; 171(14):1281-4. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.327
Abstract
Source: PubMed
Comments on this publication
ResearchGate members can add comments. Sign up now and post your comment!
Similar publications
Creating an oversight infrastructure for electronic health record-related patient safety hazards.
Journal of patient safety. 7(4):169-74.
Using the agency for healthcare research and quality patient safety indicators for targeting nursing quality improvement.
Journal of nursing care quality. 27(2):99-108.
Functional safety of health information technology.
Health informatics journal. 18(1):36-49.
The WHO surgical checklist.
Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology. 25(2):161-8.
Effect of a comprehensive obstetric patient safety program on compensation payments and sentinel events.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 204(2):97-105.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.

