Article

The dosages of corticosteroid in transforaminal epidural steroid injections for lumbar radicular pain due to a herniated disc.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Kangwon National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Pain physician (Impact Factor: 4.77). 01/2011; 14(4):361-70.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Intervertebral disc herniations are the most common cause of lumbosacral radiculopathy, and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) is an important tool in treating lumbosacral radiculopathy. But the ideal dose of corticosteroid in the epidural management of lumbosacral radiculopathy has yet to be determined.
The aim of this study was to determine the effective dose of steroids in TFESI for pain reduction in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy.
A randomized, double blind, controlled trial.
An interventional pain management practice center.
A total of 160 participants received 2 epidural injections of either 5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg of triamcinolone in one week intervals via TFESI. The degree of participant satisfaction and verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) were assessed at pretreatment, one week, and 2 weeks after the first TFESI.
The number of participants experiencing pain relief was significantly less than in other groups in the 5 mg triamcinolone group at one week after the first TFESI. There were no significant differences among the groups at one week after the second TFESI. VNRS decreased in the other groups except the triamcinolone 5 mg group at one week after the first TFESI. VNRS decreased in all groups at one week after the second TFESI.
The limitations include lack of placebo control group and lack of long-term follow-up.
We recommend a minimal effective dose of corticosteroid (triamcinolone 10 mg) in TFESI for patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
78 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To review lumbar epidural drug injection routes in relation to current practice and the reported criteria used for selecting a given approach. This was a HIPPA-compliant study. Employing a systematic search strategy, the MEDLINE and EMBASE databank as well as the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on epidural drug injections. The following data were noted: access route, level of injection, use of image guidance, and types and doses of injected drugs. Justifications for the use of a particular route were also noted. Data were presented using descriptive statistics. A total of 1,211 scientific studies were identified, of which 91 were finally included (7.5 %). The interlaminar access route was used in 44 of 91 studies (48.4 %), the transforaminal in 37 of 91 studies (40.7 %), and the caudal pathway in 26 of 91 studies (28.6 %). The caudal pathway was favored in the older studies whereas the transforaminal route was favored in recent studies. Decision criteria related to correct needle placement, concentration of injected drug at lesion site, technical complexity, costs, and potential complications. Injection was usually performed on the level of the lesion using local anesthetics (71 of 91 studies, 78.0 %), steroids (all studies) and image guidance (71 of 91 studies, 78 %). The most commonly used access routes for epidural drug injection are the interlaminar and transforaminal pathways at the level of the pathology. Transforaminal routes are being performed with increasing frequency in recent years.
    Skeletal Radiology 08/2013; · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most clinical guidelines do not recommend routine use of epidural steroid injections for the management of chronic low back pain. However, many clinicians do not adhere to these guidelines. This comprehensive evidence overview concluded that off-label epidural steroid injections provide small short-term but not long- term leg-pain relief and improvement in function; injection of steroids is no more effective than injection of local anesthetics alone; post-procedural complications are uncommon, but the risk of contamination and serious infections is very high. The evidence does not support routine use of off-label epidural steroid injections in adults with benign radicular lumbosacral pain.
    Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 05/2014; 25(2):471-489.e50. · 1.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are the most widely utilized pain management procedure in the world, their use supported by more than 45 placebo-controlled studies and dozens of systematic reviews. Despite the extensive literature on the subject, there continues to be considerable controversy surrounding their safety and efficacy. The results of clinical trials and review articles are heavily influenced by specialty, with those done by interventional pain physicians more likely to yield positive findings. Overall, more than half of controlled studies have demonstrated positive findings, suggesting a modest effect size lasting less than 3 months in well-selected individuals. Transforaminal injections are more likely to yield positive results than interlaminar or caudal injections, and subgroup analyses indicate a slightly greater likelihood for a positive response for lumbar herniated disk, compared with spinal stenosis or axial spinal pain. Other factors that may increase the likelihood of a positive outcome in clinical trials include the use of a nonepidural (eg, intramuscular) control group, higher volumes in the treatment group, and the use of depo-steroid. Serious complications are rare following ESIs, provided proper precautions are taken. Although there are no clinical trials comparing different numbers of injections, guidelines suggest that the number of injections should be tailored to individual response, rather than a set series. Most subgroup analyses of controlled studies show no difference in surgical rates between ESI and control patients; however, randomized studies conducted by spine surgeons, in surgically amenable patients with standardized operative criteria, indicate that in some patients the strategic use of ESI may prevent surgery.
    Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 38(3):175-200. · 4.16 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
0 Downloads