Article

Total lower-eyelid reconstruction: modified Fricke's cheek flap.

Department of Surgery, Instituto Dermatológico de Jalisco Dr. José Barba Rubio Secretaria de Salud Jalisco, Guadalajara, Mexico.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.44). 07/2011; 64(11):1430-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.06.044
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The present work reviews a total lower-eyelid reconstruction technique that is currently not widely in use but which, in some cases, has proven to be of great utility in the field of reconstructive plastic surgery of the palpebral area. We performed an observational, longitudinal, descriptive and retrospective follow-up study. A total of 34 cases of non-melanoma skin cancer in which the lower eyelid was completely reconstructed using one flap taken from the cheek (modified Fricke's cheek flap) were reviewed. The follow-up time for the patients ranged from several months to 5 years. Analysis was performed using the Pearson's chi-square statistical test in an effort to examine the association between the technique's range of functionality and aesthetic variables. Results were considered significant with a p<0.05. The functional result was regular for 91.2%, poor for 8.8% and excellent for 0% (p<0.05). The aesthetic result was regular for 88.2%, poor for 11.8% and excellent for 0% (p<0.05). The main complications were scleral exposure and temporary ocular chemosis. Fricke's lower cheek flap is an easy-to-perform, important and often-necessary technique that, in some cases, has yielded positive functional and aesthetic results. This procedure is performed on an outpatient basis and is optimal for aged patients who present with skin cancer and who require total lower-eyelid reconstruction. The use of this technique is associated with a low complication rate and low morbidity.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
200 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To revisit an important but outmoded periorbital reconstructive technique. We present cases to illustrate the usefulness of the Fricke flap and describe a method of rapid intraoperative tissue expansion (RITE), which can enhance the applicability and effectiveness of the Fricke flap. A comparison between those cases performed with and without adjunctive RITE was not made due to the low numbers available. A retrospective review of clinical cases. A total of 20 cases in which the Fricke flap was used for periorbital reconstruction were reviewed. The mean patient age was 64.7 years; the male-to-female ratio was 1:1. The patient follow-up ranged from 1 to 8 years with a mean of 4.2 years. The most common cause (65%) of periorbital defect was excision of eyelid malignancy. Necrosis of the terminal segment of the flap requiring further surgical intervention occurred in 10% (2/20). In both of these cases, the surgeons were trainees, with the complications being due to poor surgical technique. In the first case, the flap base was too narrow and in the second case, the distal end of the flap was thinned excessively. The functional result was excellent in 10/20 (50%), good in 5/20 (25%), fair in 3/20 (15%), and poor in 2/20 (10%). The cosmetic result was excellent in 3/20 (15%), good in 12/20 (60%), fair in 3/20 (15%), and poor in 2/20 (10%). The Fricke flap is an important and, in selected cases, an indispensable technique in periorbital reconstruction.
    Eye 09/2005; 19(8):854-60. · 1.82 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Hughes tarsoconjunctival flap was initially described in 1937. This flap is best used for reconstructing full-thickness defects involving the central portion of the lower eyelid. The evolution of this flap over the last 60 years is outlined. Several important modifications are presented; these modifications lead to decreased donor-site morbidity and improved recipient site outcome.
    Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 09/1999; 104(2):518-22; quiz 523; discussion 524-6. · 3.54 Impact Factor
  • Plastic and reconstructive surgery 11/2005; 116(5):76e-82e; discussion 83e-84e. · 2.74 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
3 Downloads
Available from