Article

Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth.

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.37). 08/2011; 118(2 Pt 1):323-33. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182255999
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The growing public health awareness of prematurity and its complications has prompted careful evaluation of the timing of deliveries by clinicians and hospitals. Preterm birth is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and affects more than half a million births in the United States each year. In some situations, however, a late-preterm or early-term birth is the optimal outcome for the mother, child, or both owing to conditions that can result in worse outcomes if pregnancy is allowed to continue. These conditions may be categorized as placental, maternal, or fetal, including conditions such as placenta previa, preeclampsia, and multiple gestations. Some risks associated with early delivery are common to all conditions, including prematurity-related morbidities (eg, respiratory distress syndrome and intraventricular hemorrhage) as well as maternal intrapartum morbidities such as failed induction and cesarean delivery. However, when continuation of the pregnancy is associated with more risks such as hemorrhage, uterine rupture, and stillbirth, preterm delivery maybe indicated. In February 2011, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine held a workshop titled "Timing of Indicated Late Preterm and Early Term Births." The goal of the workshop was to synthesize the available information regarding conditions that may result in medically indicated late-preterm and early-term births to determine the potential risks and benefits of delivery compared with continued pregnancy, determine the optimal gestational age for delivery of affected pregnancies when possible, and inform future research regarding these issues. Based on available data and expert opinion, optimal timing for delivery for specific conditions was determined by consensus.

1 Bookmark
 · 
154 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hemorrhage is the most common cause of maternal mortality worldwide, and represents the third most common obstetrical cause of maternal death in the United States. Although uterine atony was previously a major cause of peripartum hemorrhage, more recently, it appears that abnormal placentation is the leading etiology and the main indication of peripartum hysterectomy. Early identification and aggressive management of obstetrical hemorrhage is of utmost importance to prevent maternal morbidities and mortality.
    Clinical obstetrics and gynecology. 09/2014;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to develop and validate an antepartum risk score based on maternal and obstetric characteristics to predict the requirement for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission among late preterm infants. A chart review was performed of 455 singleton late preterm deliveries at our institution between July 2010 and December 2011. Logistic regression analysis was used to develop a risk score, which was derived from β coefficients of the significant variables. A receiver-operator curve was plotted to determine the optimal cut-off score for predicting NICU admission. Validation of the score was tested in another cohort of 450 women who delivered a singleton late preterm infant between January 2012 and June 2013. A total of 98 infants (21.5%) in the development cohort were admitted to the NICU. The significant factors for NICU admission included: premature rupture of membranes, antepartum hemorrhage, medical disorders during pregnancy, prenatal estimation of fetal weight, gestational age at delivery, and mode of delivery. These six variables were integrated into a risk-scoring model, which ranged from -2 to 9 points. A cut-off score of ≥1 produced the maximum area under the receiver-operator curve of 0.764. At this cut-off point, the sensitivity was 79.6% and specificity was 73.1%. When the risk score was tested in the validation cohort, similar results were demonstrated. An antepartum risk score was developed to predict the requirement for NICU admission among late preterm infants and was validated in an independent cohort. © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2014 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 11/2014; · 0.93 Impact Factor
  • NeoReviews 01/2013; 14(1):e4-e12.

Preview

Download
3 Downloads
Available from