Sonographic Examination of the Neck after Definitive Radiotherapy for Node-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77030, USA.
American Journal of Neuroradiology (Impact Factor: 3.59). 07/2011; 32(8):1532-8. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2545
Source: PubMed


Radiographic determination of viable disease in cervical adenopathy following RT for head and neck cancer can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of US, with or without FNA, in regard to the postradiotherapy effects on documented metastatic adenopathy in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.
This study included 133 patients with node-positive oropharyngeal cancer who were irradiated from 1998 to 2004. Sonographic evaluation was performed within 6 months of completion of radiation. Posttreatment US results were compared with pretreatment CT images and were recorded as the following: progression, suspicious, indeterminate, posttreatment change, or regression (positive) versus nonsuspicious or benign (negative). FNAC was classified as nondiagnostic, negative, indeterminate, or positive. Results of US and US-guided FNAC were correlated with findings at neck dissection and disease outcome.
Of 203 sonographic examinations, 90% were technically feasible and yielded a nonequivocal imaging diagnosis. Of 87 US-guided FNAs, 71% yielded a nonequivocal tissue diagnosis. The PPV and NPV of initial posttreatment US were 11% and 97%. Sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 28%. The PPV and NPV of US-guided FNA were 33% and 95%, and the sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 74%. On serial sonographic surveillance, of 33 patients with nonsuspicious findings, only 1 (3%) had neck recurrence. Of 22 patients with questionable findings on CT and negative findings on US, none had a neck recurrence.
In experienced hands, serial US is an inexpensive noninvasive reassuring follow-up strategy after definitive head and neck RT, even when CT findings are equivocal.

4 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This analysis was undertaken to assess the need for planned neck dissection in patients with a complete response (CR) of involved nodes after irradiation and to determine the benefit of a neck dissection in those with less than CR by tumor site. Our cohort included 880 patients with T1-4, N1-3M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx who received treatment between 1994 and 2004. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier Method, comparisons of rates with the log-rank test and prognostic factors by Cox's proportional hazard model. Nodal CR occurred in 377 (43%) patients, of whom 365 patients did not undergo nodal dissection. The 5-year actuarial regional control rate of patients with CR was 92%. Two hundred sixty-eight of the remaining patients (53%) underwent neck dissections. The 5-year actuarial regional control rate for patients without a CR was 84%. Those who had a neck dissection fared better with 5-year actuarial regional control rates of 90% and 76% for those operated and those not operated (p < 0.001). Variables associated with poorer regional control rates included higher T and N stage, non-oropharynx cancers, non-CR, both clinical and pathological. With 92% 5-year neck control rate without neck dissection after CR, there is little justification for systematic neck dissection. The addition of a neck dissection resulted in higher neck control after partial response though patients with viable tumor on pathology specimens had poorer outcomes. The identification of that subgroup that benefits from additional treatment remains a challenge.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 03/2012; 82(3):e367-74. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.062 · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients whose necks respond completely to chemoradiation are unlikely to have residual viable tumour, which questions the need for planned neck dissection. Partial responders often need further assessment. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is becoming the standard method of assessing the response of both the primary site and neck to chemoradiation. There is debate, however, about the timing of assessment, the best imaging technique, and the extent of neck dissection, and emerging evidence supports more selective procedures with their attendant reductions in morbidity. Various trials have tried to settle these controversies, but we hypothesised that current practice varies across the United Kingdom (UK), so we set out to establish what it is. A total of 219 questionnaires were sent to head and neck surgeons of varying disciplines and their oncology counterparts, which outlined a clinical picture of a patient with persistent nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy, and requested information about the respondents' preferred choice and timing of investigations in addition to the type of neck dissection, if indicated. There were noticeable variations in practice, with a tendency towards personal choice rather than a multidisciplinary approach. Although there were some items of broad agreement, there was disparity about the timing of imaging and operation. There is inconsistency in the management of the neck in these patients in the UK, which may reflect an absence of guidelines and paucity of evidence-based information. We need to unify practice to improve the care of patients.
    British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 03/2012; 51(1). DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.02.017 · 1.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and purpose: Criteria for detection of persistent nodal metastases in treated oropharyngeal tumors are sensitive but nonspecific, leading to unnecessary nodal dissections. Developing specific imaging criteria for persistent nodal metastases could improve diagnosis while decreasing patient morbidity. Materials and methods: Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with nodal metastases treated by definitive radiation therapy and subsequent nodal dissection were retrospectively evaluated. One hundred thirty-eight patients had pre- and posttherapy contrast-enhanced CTs evaluated by radiologists blinded to the status of pathologically proved hemineck persistent nodal metastases. Composite scoring criteria for CT, combined from individual parameters, were compared with radiologists' opinions, previous multiparameter criteria, and outcome data. Results: New low-attenuation areas and a lack of size change (<20% cross sectional area) were both highly specific for persistent nodal metastases (99%; P = .0004). Extranodal disease on pretherapy imaging was moderately specific (86%; P = .001). The CSC correctly placed 29 patients in a low-risk category compared with 14 by previously reported criteria and radiologist reports. With good second-rater reliability, the CSC cutoff values stratified patients at highest risk of persistent nodal metastases, thereby improving specificity while maintaining sensitivity. Conclusions: Comparing pre- and posttherapy examinations improves specificity by discriminating focal findings and size change compared with a single time point. The CSC can categorize the risk of persistent nodal metastases more accurately than previous CT methods. This finding has the potential to improve resource use and reduce surgical morbidity.
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 03/2013; 34(8). DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A3461 · 3.59 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications