Article

Mental health service utilization among noncitizens in the United States: findings from the National Latino and Asian American Study.

College of Social Work, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, 1618 Cumberland Ave, Knoxville, TN 37996-3333, USA.
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 3.44). 07/2011; 39(5):406-18. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-011-0366-8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Since the Welfare Reform Act of 1996, citizenship status has become an important consideration in mental health service utilization due to the restrictions on federal healthcare benefits for noncitizens living in the U.S. Using a nationally representative sample of Latinos and Asians, we examined the extent to which U.S. citizenship status was related to rates of mental health service utilization. We also identified several predictors of mental health service utilization among noncitizens. Noncitizens were about 40% less likely than U.S.-born citizens to use any mental health services. Findings are discussed in the context of healthcare policy and recent healthcare reform.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
98 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As a community partner and an academic researcher, we experienced the direct and extended benefits of a relatively small-scale, community-engaged informed consent process that developed in an immigrant occupational health study, Assessing and Controlling Occupational Health Risks for Immigrant Populations in Somerville, Massachusetts. The practice of human participants research played a positive role in the community, and both community partners and researchers, as well as the larger academic community, reaped unexpected benefits during the five-year project (2005-2010), which continue into the present. Lessons learned from our experience may be helpful for wider application. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print October 17, 2013: e1-e4. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301517).
    American Journal of Public Health 10/2013; 103(12). DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301517 · 3.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE This study examined the factors associated with service utilization for mental health conditions among Latino and Asian non-U.S. citizens in the United States by service type and race. METHODS Data were obtained from the National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS). The sample for this study was 849 Latino and 595 Asian non-U.S. citizens between ages 18 and 64 (N=1,444). Mental health services obtained through three types of service providers were examined: specialty mental health services, general medical services, and other services. Guided by the modified Andersen health behavioral model, analyses involved logistic regression models conducted with penalized maximum likelihood estimation. RESULTS Although having a psychiatric disorder increased mental health service use in both groups, only 32% of Latino and 52% of Asian non-U.S. citizens with psychiatric needs reported using mental health services during the past 12 months. Overall, noncitizen Latinos and Asians were more likely to use mental health services from general health care providers and other providers than from specialty mental health providers. Several significant predisposing, enabling, and need factors, such as age, health insurance, and having psychiatric conditions, also interacted with race. CONCLUSIONS Findings of the study suggest that there are ethnoracial variations in mental health service use between Latino and Asian non-U.S. citizens. Mental health professionals should consider developing tailored mental health interventions that account for cultural variations to enhance access to services for these vulnerable subgroups of Latinos and Asians. Further research should examine ethnic disparities in mental health service use among various non-U.S. citizen racial-ethnic subgroups.
    Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) 10/2013; 65(1). DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201200430 · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is conflicting evidence of the healthy migrant effect with respect to mental health. This study aims to determine if there are differences in mental health and service use between Australian-born and foreign-born individuals living in South Australia and to consider the differing role of socio-demographic characteristics for Australian-born and foreign-born men and women.
    BMC Public Health 10/2014; 14(1):1111. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1111 · 2.32 Impact Factor