De-marketing Tobacco Through Price Changes and Consumer Attempts Quit Smoking

Journal of Business Ethics (Impact Factor: 1.33). 02/2008; 77(4):405-416. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9356-x
Source: RePEc


Using panel data from three Canadian provinces, this article examines the relationship between the de-marketing of tobacco
products through provincial-level price increases and consumers’ attempts to quit smoking as measured by the uptake of tobacco
replacement therapies. We ground our hypotheses in the rational addiction model and the theory of planned behavior. Our analyses
suggest a positive, one-month lagged effect of a price increase of tobacco products on the uptake of tobacco replacement therapies.
This effect dissipates 3 months later, suggesting that there is a critical period for aggressive de-marketing of tobacco products.
We discuss the implications of these results for theory and future research into de-marketing harmful consumer products.

Download full-text


Available from: Julian Barling, Aug 27, 2014
1 Follower
144 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The purpose of this general review paper is to provide a comparison and evaluation of the treatment of pricing by the disciplines of economics and marketing. Design/methodology/approach – It is from three perspectives that the marketing and economics approaches to pricing are reviewed, namely, buyers' response to price, firm's determination of price, and industry- or economy-wide role of price. Findings – A comparative review of the relevant marketing and economics literature shows that there are important differences between the two disciplines in their treatment of pricing. Marketing demonstrates a richer and more empirically based treatment of the pricing issue from the buyer's perspective, while economics is unchallenged from the economy-wide perspective. The differences found between the marketing and economics approaches to pricing are mostly due to their different historical origins, primary concerns and doctrinal evolution. In contrast, interdisciplinary loans especially from behavioral science have made possible considerable advances in marketing, particularly in the understanding of the buyer's perspective. Originality/value – Previous reviews of the pricing literature do not attempt to provide a direct comparison and evaluation and offer no explanation for the observed differences among the economics and the marketing disciplines regarding their treatment of the pricing issue. The value and originality of the current paper lies in the fact that it represents the first attempt to provide such a comparison and evaluation.
    Journal of Product &amp Brand Management 09/2005; 14(6):362-374. DOI:10.1108/10610420510624512
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present an overview and evaluation of the European Commission “HELP – for a life without tobacco” campaign. Design/methodology/approach – Data collected via a web and a telephone survey is used to evaluate the campaign. Findings – The findings reveal how a campaign targeted at individuals can lead to social change through involvement with key stakeholder groups including NGO's and the public at large. At an individual level the campaign was received favourably with overall high levels of awareness and engagement with the message. The associated web site was thought to contain trustworthy information and persuasive arguments about the dangers of smoking and passive smoking. Originality/value – The originality of this paper lies in providing an example of social advertising across a large number of countries. Furthermore, this case study adds to the literature on demarketing, highlighting that demarketing can take place across two levels both at the citizen level and at the governmental level.
    Marketing Intelligence &amp Planning 06/2009; 27(4):486-502. DOI:10.1108/02634500910964056
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Few studies have examined interest in quitting smoking and factors associated with quitting in mainland China. To characterise interest in quitting, quitting behaviour, the use of cessation methods and reasons for thinking about quitting among adult urban smokers in six cities in China. Data is from Wave 1 of the ITC China Survey, a face-to-face household survey of 4732 adult smokers randomly selected from six cities in China in 2006. Households were sampled using a stratified multistage design. The majority of smokers had no plan to quit smoking (75.6%). Over half (52.7%) of respondents had ever tried to quit smoking. Few respondents thought that they could successfully quit smoking (26.5%). Smokers were aware of stop-smoking medications (73.5%) but few had used these medications (5.6%). Only 48.2% had received advice from a physician to quit smoking. The number one reason for thinking about quitting smoking in the last 6 months was concern for personal health (55.0%). Most smokers also believed that the government should do more to control smoking (75.2%). These findings demonstrate the need to: (1) increase awareness of the dangers of smoking; (2) provide cessation support for smokers; (3) have physicians encourage smokers to quit; (4) denormalise tobacco use so that smokers feel pressured to quit; (5) implement smoke-free laws to encourage quitting; (6) develop stronger warning labels about the specific dangers of smoking and provide resources for obtaining further cessation assistance; and (7) increase taxes and raise the price of cigarettes.
    Tobacco control 10/2010; 19 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):i12-7. DOI:10.1136/tc.2009.031179 · 5.93 Impact Factor