Activation of cAMP Signaling Interferes with Stress-Induced p53 Accumulation in ALL-Derived Cells by Promoting the Interaction between p53 and HDM2 1 2

Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) (Impact Factor: 4.25). 07/2011; 13(7):653-63. DOI: 10.1593/neo.11542
Source: PubMed


The tumor suppressor p53 provides an important barrier to the initiation and maintenance of cancers. As a consequence, p53 function must be inactivated for a tumor to develop. This is achieved by mutation in approximately 50% of cases and probably by functional inactivation in the remaining cases. We have previously shown that the second messenger cAMP can inhibit DNA damage-induced wild-type p53 accumulation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells, leading to a profound reduction of their apoptotic response. In the present article, we provide a mechanistic insight into the regulation of p53 levels by cAMP. We show that increased levels of cAMP augment the binding of p53 to its negative regulator HDM2, overriding the DNA damage-induced dissociation of p53 from HDM2. This results in maintained levels of p53 ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, which in turn counteracts the DNA damage-induced stabilization of the p53 protein. The apoptosis inhibitory effect of cAMP is further shown to depend on this effect on p53 levels. These findings potentially implicate deregulation of cAMP signaling as a candidate mechanism used by transformed cells to quench the p53 response while retaining wild-type p53.

Download full-text


Available from: Aart G Jochemsen, Oct 31, 2014
  • Source
    • "Therefore, the cAMP level is unlikely to be the main reason of p53 accumulation in the bystander cells and thus cAMP may be not the trigger of bystander responses. Most possibly, other bystander signaling such as NO [43] and ROS [17] could firstly activate p53 and trigger p53-related apoptotic response, and then cAMP may modulate the p53 accumulation and adjust the degree of the bystander response. Consistent with this opinion, Naderi et al. suggested that the cAMP level could regulate apoptosis through p53-HDM2 interaction and resulted in p53 alteration [21] [44]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Irradiated cells can induce biological effects on vicinal non-irradiated bystander cells, meanwhile the bystander cells may rescue the irradiated cells through a feedback signal stress. To elucidate the nature of this reciprocal effect, we examined the interaction between α-irradiated human macrophage cells U937 and its bystander HL-7702 hepatocyte cells using a cell co-culture system. Results showed that after 6 h of cell co-culture, mitochondria depolarization corresponding to apoptosis was significantly induced in the HL-7702 cells, but the formation of micronuclei in the irradiated U937 cells was markedly decreased compared to that without cell co-culture treatment. This reciprocal effect was not observed when the cell membrane signaling pathway was blocked by filipin that inhibited cAMP transmission from bystander cells to irradiated cells. After treatment of cells with exogenous cAMP, forskolin (an activator of cAMP) or KH-7 (an inhibitor of cAMP), respectively, it was confirmed that cAMP communication from bystander cells to targeted cells could mitigate radiation damage in U739 cells, and this cAMP insufficiency in the bystander cells contributed to the enhancement of bystander apoptosis. Moreover, the bystander apoptosis in HL-7702 cells was aggravated by cAMP inhibition but it could not be evoked when p53 of HL-7702 cells was knocked down no matter of forskolin and KH-7 treatment. In conclusion, this study disclosed that cAMP could be released from bystander HL-7702 cells and compensated to α-irradiated U937 cells through a membrane signaling pathway and this cAMP communication played a profound role in regulating the reciprocal bystander effects.
    Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 05/2014; 763–764. DOI:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.03.001 · 3.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "such as Noxa, Bid, Bim, Bax, p21 WAF1 , P27 KIP1 , P53, and IkBa), will accumulate after inhibition (Dick and Fleming, 2010; Driscoll et al., 2011; Naderi et al., 2011; Inuzuka et al., 2011 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Twenty years ago a proteasome inhibitor was suggested as therapy for glucocorticoid-resistant multiple myeloma, a disease that involves terminally differentiated B cells. Since then, research has proven that it has utility on a number of tumors resistant to chemotherapy. Hematologic malignancy, however, often involves lesser differentiated cells, which have a high potential to modulate their intrinsic machinery and thereby activate alternative rescue pathways. A corresponding multiplicity of therapies is not always practical. One approach to conditions with heterogeneous physiology is to identify key biochemical mediators, thereby reducing the number of treatment targets. Results from several ongoing studies indicate convergence of genomically diverse signal pathways to a limited number of key downstream regulators of apoptosis. Convergence of pathways can be exploited to address the problem of genetic heterogeneity in acute leukemia: this would mean treating multiple molecular aberrations with fewer drugs and enhanced therapeutic benefit.
    Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 04/2012; 351(2):142-51. DOI:10.1016/j.mce.2012.01.003 · 4.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The elegance of fundamental and applied research activities have begun to reveal a myriad of spatial and temporal alterations in downstream signaling networks affected by cell surface receptor stimulation including G protein-coupled receptors and receptor tyrosine kinases. Interconnected biochemical pathways serve to integrate and distribute the signaling information throughout the cell by orchestration of complex biochemical circuits consisting of protein interactions and covalent modification processes. It is clear that scientific literature summarizing results from both fundamental and applied scientific research activities has served to provide a broad foundational biologic database that has been instrumental in advancing our continued understanding of underlying cancer biology. This article reflects on historical advances and the role of innovation in the competitive world of grant-sponsored research.
    Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) 12/2011; 13(12):1183-93. DOI:10.1593/neo.111746 · 4.25 Impact Factor
Show more