Article

Sorafenib and dacarbazine as first-line therapy for advanced melanoma: phase I and open-label phase II studies.

Department of Oncology (R4), Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
British Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.08). 07/2011; 105(3):353-9. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.257
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The safety of oral sorafenib up to a maximum protocol-specified dose combined with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic, histologically confirmed melanoma was investigated in a phase I dose-escalation study and the activity of the combination was explored in an open-label phase II study.
In the phase I study, three patients were treated with sorafenib 200 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) plus 1000 mg m(-2) dacarbazine on day 1 of a 21-day cycle and 15 patients had the sorafenib dose escalated to 400 mg b.i.d. without reaching the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. In the phase II study (n=83), the overall response rate was 12% (95% CI: 6, 21): one complete and nine partial, with median response duration of 46.7 weeks. Stable disease was the best response in 37%; median duration was 13.3 weeks. Median overall survival (OS) was 37.0 weeks (95% CI: 33.9, 46.0).
Oral sorafenib combined with dacarbazine had acceptable toxicity and some antineoplastic activity against metastatic melanoma.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
135 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Improved prognostic accuracy for treatment response and a wider understanding of drug effects in humans are crucial for enhancing the utility of sorafenib and other promising targeted therapies. We developed a strategy of global genomic investigation of sequential tumor biopsy samples at baseline and 21 days post treatment, and applied this approach in a phase I study of sorafenib plus dacarbazine in patients with solid tumors. The objective of this study was also to validate functional parameters of DCE-US as surrogate markers to predict earlier response. Experimental design Patients received 21-day cycles of oral sorafenib, 400 mg twice daily and dacarbazine, 1,000 mg/m(2) in a 1-h intravenous infusion on day 1. Efficacy was assessed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Sequential biopsy samples (baseline and day 21) were obtained from the same tumor. Changes from baseline in global gene expression (GE) measured by genomic microarrays and in tumor vascularity at baseline, D8, D21, D 42 and every 2 cycles using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) were analyzed for patients with and without a clinical response to treatment at 3 months. Results Among 23 patients evaluable for treatment efficacy, 17 were eligible for gene expression and DCE-US analyses. One patient achieved a partial response; 14 exhibited stable disease. Ten patients were defined as exhibiting stable disease (SD) and 7, progressive disease (PD) at 3 months. Genomic analyses identified a 237-gene signature that distinguished SD from PD at 3 months. Of note, CDK4 overexpression and PDGFR downregulation were associated with PD. Functional parameters of DCE-US representing the blood volume at baseline, day 8, and day 21 were correlated with disease progression at 3 months. Conclusions This novel approach of sequential investigations in a phase I trial was feasible, detecting early changes in gene expression and tumor vascularity evaluated using DCE-US that may be predictive of clinical outcome.
    Investigational New Drugs 08/2013; · 3.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Metastatic malignant melanoma is a uniformly fatal disease. Tumor growth and metastasis are associated with angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Proangiogenic factors are associated with higher disease burdens and worse outcomes in melanoma. Accordingly, many agents that target angiogenesis have been studied in melanoma. Angiogenesis is a complex, multifaceted process with many potential therapeutic targets. So far, monoclonal antibodies, immune conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and other therapies have been tested in the phase 2 or phase 3 setting for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. The antiangiogenic agents that have been tested to date offer little activity as single agents, but in combination with cytotoxic agents prolong progression-free survival. We explore data from published phase 2 and phase 3 trials in addition to the purported mechanisms of action of antiangiogenic agents.
    Current Oncology Reports 09/2013; · 3.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cutaneous melanoma is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis for patients with advanced disease. The identification of several key molecular pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of melanoma has led to the development of novel therapies for this devastating disease. In melanoma, both the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK (MAPK) and the PI3K/AKT (AKT) signalling pathways are constitutively activated through multiple mechanisms. Targeting various effectors of these pathways with pharmacologic inhibitors may inhibit melanoma cell growth and angiogenesis. Ongoing clinical trials provide hope to improve progression-free survival of patients with advanced melanoma. This review summarizes the most relevant studies focused on the specific action of these new molecular targeted agents. Mechanisms of resistance to therapy are also discussed.
    International Journal of Oncology 06/2014; · 2.66 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
28 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014