Article

Ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhi, United States, 1999-2008.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emerging Infectious Diseases (Impact Factor: 6.79). 06/2011; 17(6):1095-8. DOI: 10.3201/eid/1706.100594
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We report 9 ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi isolates submitted to the US National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System during 1999-2008. The first 2 had indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns and identical gyrA and parC mutations. Eight of the 9 patients had traveled to India within 30 days before illness onset.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
123 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We characterized Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates from Bangladesh, Indonesia, Taiwan and Vietnam to investigate their genetic relatedness and antimicrobial resistance. The isolates from Bangladesh and Vietnam were genetically closely related but distant from those from Indonesia and Taiwan. All but a few isolates from Indonesia and Taiwan were susceptible to all antimicrobials tested. The majority of isolates from Bangladesh and Vietnam were multidrug resistant (MDR) and belonged to the widespread haplotype H58 clone. IncHI1 plasmids were detected in all MDR S. Typhi from Vietnam but in only 15% of MDR isolates from Bangladesh. Resistance genes in the majority of MDR S. Typhi from Bangladesh should reside in the chromosome. Of the isolates from Bangladesh, 82% and 40% isolates were resistant to varying concentrations of nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin, respectively. Several resistance mechanisms including alterations in gyrase A, the presence of QnrS and enhanced efflux pumps were involved in the reduced susceptibility and resistance to fluoroquinolone. Intensive surveillance is necessary to monitor the spread of the chromosome-mediated MDR and fluoroquinolone-resistant S. Typhi emerging in Bangladesh.
    Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 08/2014; · 4.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Enteric fever is endemic in Nepal and poses a significant public health burden. The first-line drugs ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole have not been part of empirical therapy for two decades due to the development of multidrug-resistant Salmonella strains. The objective of this study was to determine the antibiogram pattern of Salmonella serovars isolated from the blood of clinically suspected enteric fever patients. Methodology: A cross sectional study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital in Lalitpur, Nepal, between July 2011 and February 2012. Standard microbiological procedures were followed during collection and processing of blood samples, isolation and identification of Salmonella serotypes. The antimicrobial sensitivity of ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, nalidixic acid, and ciprofloxacin was determined using a modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method as per the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Results: Out of 86 Salmonella isolates, 56 (65.1%) were Salmonella Typhi and 30 (34.9%) were Salmonella Paratyphi A. Salmonella Typhi were 100% sensitive to chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, and ciprofloxacin and 98.2% sensitive to ampicillin. Similarly, Salmonella Paratyphi A isolates were 100% sensitive to ampicillin and cotrimoxazole and 96.7% sensitive to chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin. More than 90.0% of isolates were nalidixic acid resistant and none of the Salmonella isolates were multi-drug resistant. Conclusions: This study revealed the increasing frequency of nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella isolates, indicating the possibility of fluoroquinolone resistance in near future. Furthermore, re-emergence of susceptibility to conventional first-line drugs ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole supports the possibility of using these drugs in empirical therapy.
    The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 11/2014; 2014(8(11)):1483-1487. · 1.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Enteric fever, caused by Salmonella enterica, remains an unresolved public health problem in India and antimicrobial therapy is the main mode of treatment. The objective of this study was to characterize the Salmonella enterica isolates from Kolkata with respect to their antimicrobial resistance (AMR), virulence profiles and molecular subtypes. Salmonella enterica blood isolates were collected from clinically suspected enteric fever patients attending various hospitals in Kolkata, India from January 2009 to June 2013 and were tested for AMR profiles by standard protocols; for resistance gene transfer by conjugation; for resistance and virulence genes profiles by PCR; and for molecular subtypes by Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE). A total of 77 Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) and 25 Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A (S. Paratyphi A) from Kolkata were included in this study. Although multidrug resistance (resistance to chloramphenicol, ampicillin, co-trimoxazole) was decreasing in S. Typhi (18.2%) and absent in S. Paratyphi A, increased resistance to fluoroquinolone, the current drug of choice, caused growing concern for typhoid treatment. A single, non-conjugative non-IncHI1 plasmid of 180 kb was found in 71.4% multidrug resistant (MDR) S. Typhi; the remaining 28.6% isolates were without plasmid. Various AMR markers (blaTEM-1, catA, sul1, sul2, dfrA15, strA-strB) and class 1 integron with dfrA7 gene were detected in MDR S. Typhi by PCR and sequencing. Most of the study isolates were likely to be virulent due to the presence of virulence markers. Major diversity was not noticed among S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A from Kolkata by PFGE. The observed association between AMR profiles and S. Typhi pulsotypes might be useful in controlling the spread of the organism by appropriate intervention. The study reiterated the importance of continuous monitoring of AMR and molecular subtypes of Salmonella isolates from endemic regions for better understanding of the disease epidemiology.
    PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(8):e101347. · 3.53 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
25 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014