Negative auto-regulation increases the input dynamic-range of the arabinose system of Escherichia coli

Department of Molecular Cell Biology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel.
BMC Systems Biology (Impact Factor: 2.44). 07/2011; 5(1):111. DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-111
Source: PubMed


Gene regulation networks are made of recurring regulatory patterns, called network motifs. One of the most common network motifs is negative auto-regulation, in which a transcription factor represses its own production. Negative auto-regulation has several potential functions: it can shorten the response time (time to reach halfway to steady-state), stabilize expression against noise, and linearize the gene's input-output response curve. This latter function of negative auto-regulation, which increases the range of input signals over which downstream genes respond, has been studied by theory and synthetic gene circuits. Here we ask whether negative auto-regulation preserves this function also in the context of a natural system, where it is embedded within many additional interactions. To address this, we studied the negative auto-regulation motif in the arabinose utilization system of Escherichia coli, in which negative auto-regulation is part of a complex regulatory network.
We find that when negative auto-regulation is disrupted by placing the regulator araC under constitutive expression, the input dynamic range of the arabinose system is reduced by 10-fold. The apparent Hill coefficient of the induction curve changes from about n = 1 with negative auto-regulation, to about n = 2 when it is disrupted. We present a mathematical model that describes how negative auto-regulation can increase input dynamic-range, by coupling the transcription factor protein level to the input signal.
Here we demonstrate that the negative auto-regulation motif in the native arabinose system of Escherichia coli increases the range of arabinose signals over which the system can respond. In this way, negative auto-regulation may help to increase the input dynamic-range while maintaining the specificity of cooperative regulatory systems. This function may contribute to explaining the common occurrence of negative auto-regulation in biological systems.

Download full-text


Available from: Uri Alon,
  • Source
    • "Concerning araBAD, operons araC and araBAD are divergent and share the same regulatory region (Madar et al., 2011; Schleif, 2000). Moreover, AraA both activates and represses the arabinose utilization operon araBAD using a DNA looping mechanism (Lobell and Schleif, 1990; Madar et al., 2011; Seabold and Schleif, 1998); the araBAD operon starts transcription when AraC, Crp and RNA polymerase bind to DNA (Ogden et al., 1980), and its full induction depends on Crp (Kolodrubetz and Schleif, 1981b). From the above-mentioned regulatory mechanisms, it can be inferred that glucose is the preferred carbon source over arabinose. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Escherichia coli can uptake and utilize many common natural sugars to form biomass or valuable target bio-products. Carbon catabolite repression (CCR) will occur and hamper the efficient production of bio-products if E. coli strains are cultivated in a mixture of sugars containing some preferred sugar, such as glucose. Understanding the transport and metabolism mechanisms of the common and inexpensive sugars in E. coli is important for further improving the efficiency of sugar bioconversion and for reducing industrial fermentation costs using the methods of metabolic engineering, synthetic biology and systems biology. In this review, the transport and mediation mechanisms of glucose, fructose, sucrose, xylose and arabinose are discussed and summarized, and the hierarchical utilization principles of these sugars are elucidated.
    Biotechnology advances 04/2014; 32(5). DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.04.009 · 9.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "± 2.46 and R out = 8.85 ± 0.04 for the wild-type system (inset in Figure 3A). This regime of values, which are captured by our model (Figure S3A), demonstrates that dual regulation increases the sensitivity of the response with respect to a circuit without feedback, in a qualitatively similar manner to negative autoregulation (Figure S3B) (Nevozhay et al., 2009; Madar et al., 2011). "

  • Source
    • "E. coli GFP reporter strains (K12 MG1655, with a pUA66 based reporter plasmid, sc101 ori, kanR, with the gfpmut2 gene [61]) are from the fluorescent reporter library described in [35]. Strain U66 with a promoterless reporter plasmid was used for fluorescence background measurements [35,37,62]. All strains are available from Open Biosystems (Thermo Fisher Scientific Molecular Biology, USA). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lag phase is a period of time with no growth that occurs when stationary phase bacteria are transferred to a fresh medium. Bacteria in lag phase seem inert: their biomass does not increase. The low number of cells and low metabolic activity make it difficult to study this phase. As a consequence, it has not been studied as thoroughly as other bacterial growth phases. However, lag phase has important implications for bacterial infections and food safety. We asked which, if any, genes are expressed in the lag phase of Escherichia coli, and what is their dynamic expression pattern. We developed an assay based on imaging flow cytometry of fluorescent reporter cells that overcomes the challenges inherent in studying lag phase. We distinguish between lag1 phase- in which there is no biomass growth, and lag2 phase- in which there is biomass growth but no cell division. We find that in lag1 phase, most promoters are not active, except for the enzymes that utilize the specific carbon source in the medium. These genes show promoter activities that increase exponentially with time, despite the fact that the cells do not measurably increase in size. An oxidative stress promoter, katG, is also active. When cells enter lag2 and begin to grow in size, they switch to a full growth program of promoter activity including ribosomal and metabolic genes. The observed exponential increase in enzymes for the specific carbon source followed by an abrupt switch to production of general growth genes is a solution of an optimal control model, known as bang-bang control. The present approach contributes to the understanding of lag phase, the least studied of bacterial growth phases.
    BMC Systems Biology 12/2013; 7(1):136. DOI:10.1186/1752-0509-7-136 · 2.44 Impact Factor
Show more