Impact of norepinephrine on the relationship between pleth variability index and pulse pressure variations in ICU adult patients.

Emergency Department, Hôpital Pellegrin, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba Léon, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Critical care (London, England) (Impact Factor: 4.72). 07/2011; 15(4):R168. DOI: 10.1186/cc10310
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Pleth Variability Index (PVI) is an automated and continuous calculation of respiratory variations in the perfusion index. PVI correlates well with respiratory variations in pulse pressure (ΔPP) and is able to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. ICU patients may receive vasopressive drugs, which modify vascular tone and could affect PVI assessment. We hypothesized that the correlation between PVI and ΔPP and the ability of PVI to identify patients with ΔPP > 13% is dependent on norepinephrine (NE) use.
67 consecutive mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU were prospectively included. Three were excluded. The administration and dosage of NE, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, PVI and ΔPP were measured simultaneously.
In all patients, the correlation between PVI and ΔPP was weak (r2 = 0.21; p = 0.001). 23 patients exhibited a ΔPP > 13%. A PVI > 11% was able to identify patients with a ΔPP > 13% with a sensitivity of 70% (95% confidence interval: 47%-87%) and a specificity of 71% (95% confidence interval: 54%-84%). The area under the curve was 0.80 ± 0.06. 35 patients (53%) received norepinephrine (NE(+)). In NE(+) patients, PVI and ΔPP were not correlated (r2 = 0.04, p > 0.05) and a PVI > 10% was able to identify patients with a ΔPP > 13% with a sensitivity of 58% (95% confidence interval: 28%-85%) and a specificity of 61% (95% confidence interval:39%-80%). The area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve was 0.69 ± 0.01. In contrast, NE(-) patients exhibited a correlation between PVI and ΔPP (r2 = 0.52; p < 0.001) and a PVI > 10% was able to identify patients with a ΔPP > 13% with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval: 71%-100%) and a specificity of 72% (95% confidence interval: 49%-90%). The area under the ROC curve was 0.93 ± 0.06 for NE(-) patients and was significantly higher than the area under the ROC curve for NE(+) patients (p = 0.02).
Our results suggest that in mechanically ventilated adult patients, NE alters the correlation between PVI and ΔPP and the ability of PVI to predict ΔPP > 13% in ICU patients.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The dynamic change in arterial pulse pressure during mechanical ventilation (PPV) predicts fluid responsiveness in adults but may not be applicable to pediatric patients. We compared PPV during hemorrhage and reinfusion in immature vs mature piglets at two clinically relevant tidal volumes (VT). Following Institutional Animal Care Committee approval, we measured hemodynamics and PPV in two groups of piglets, 10-15 kg (immature, n = 9) and 25-30 kg (mature, n = 10), under stable intravenous anesthesia at VT = 8 and 10 mL·kg(-1). Measurements were taken at baseline, with blood withdrawal in 5 mL·kg(-1) steps up to 30 mL·kg(-1), and during stepwise reinfusion. For each age group and VT, we constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine the threshold value that was predictive of fluid responsiveness. Pulse pressure variability was significantly lower in immature vs mature pigs and at VT 8 vs VT 10 at every measurement period. The difference in PPV induced by changing VT was less in immature animals. Significant areas under the ROC curve were obtained in immature pigs at both VTs but in mature animals at VT 10 alone. A PPV threshold was calculated to be 8.2% at VT 8 and 10.9% at VT 10 in immature animals vs 15.9% at VT 10 in mature animals, but sensitivity and specificity were only 0.7. Pulse pressure variability values are lower and less sensitive to VT in immature vs mature pigs. Adult PPV thresholds do not apply to pediatric patients, and a single PPV value representing fluid responsiveness should not be assumed.
    Canadian Anaesthetists? Society Journal 03/2014; · 2.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care. 01/2014; 3(1):1-7.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of perioperative monitoring is to aid the clinician in optimizing care to achieve the best possible survival with the lowest possible morbidity. Ideally, we would like to have monitoring that can rapidly and accurately identify perturbations in circulatory well-being that would permit timely intervention and allow for restoration before the patient is damaged. The evidence to support the use of our standard monitoring strategies (continuous electrocardiography, blood pressure, central venous pressure, oxygen saturation and capnography) is based on expert opinion, case series, or at best observational studies. While these monitoring parameters will identify life-threatening events, they provide no direct information concerning the oxygen economy of the patient. Nevertheless, they are mandated by professional societies representing specialists in cardiac disease, critical care, and anesthesiology. Additional non-routine monitoring strategies that provide data concerning the body’s oxygen economy, such as venous saturation monitoring and near infrared spectroscopy, have shown promise in prospective observational studies in managing these complex groups of patients. Ideally, high-level evidence would be required before adopting these newer strategies, but in the absence of new funding sources and the challenges of the wide variation in practice patterns between centers, this seems unlikely. The evidence supporting the current standard perioperative monitoring strategies will be reviewed. In addition, evidence supporting non-routine monitoring strategies will be reviewed and their potential for added benefit assessed.
    Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Annual of the Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 01/2014; 17(1):81–90.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 31, 2014