Development and validation of an instrument to detect depression in nursing homes. Nursing homes short depression inventory (NH-SDI)
ABSTRACT Depression is often overlooked in elderly nursing home residents because symptoms may be masked or dismissed as an inevitable consequence of ageing. Current tools for the detection of depression in institutionalised older people are not always specific.
To construct and verify an instrument with which to detect depression in elderly nursing home residents (NH-SDI).
Firstly for the construction, 328 elderly people were selected at random from the residents of 17 nursing homes in France, and examined by a single investigator. The examination included a psychiatric assessment, an evaluation of cognitive function using the MMSE, an evaluation of depressive state using four different instruments (mini-GDS, Goldberg, DMAS, CSDD), and assessment of any changes in behaviour in those suffering from dementia, using the NPI. A second stage was to confirm NH-SDI in 99 institutionalised subjects.
Following the selection of items, we created a scale of 16 dichotomous items (NH-SDI). The internal consistency was satisfactory (α Cronbach = 0.85), as was its reliability with a sensitivity of 85.1% and a specificity of 86.5% for a cut-off score above 5.
The NH-SDI appears to be a useful instrument for the detection of depression in nursing homes and can easily be applied by healthcare staff as part of routine procedures.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This represents the fifth article in the series on yearly updates of hot topics in long term care.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 11/2011; 12(9):615-626.e6. DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2011.08.007 · 4.78 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aims of the study were to examine the validity of the MADRS and to compare it with the validity of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD). We included 140 patients without dementia, with mean age 81.5 (sd 7.7) years. Trained psychiatric nurses interviewed all of them using the MADRS. In addition, for 70 patients caregivers were interviewed using the CSDD. A psychiatrist who had no access to the MADRS or the CSDD results made a diagnosis of depression according to the DSM-IV criteria for major depression, and the ICD-10 criteria was also applied for the 70 patients assessed with the CSDD. Twenty-two out of the 140 had depression according to the DSM IV criteria, whereas 25 out of 70 had depression according to the ICD-10 criteria. The area under the curve (auc) in a receiver operating characteristic analysis was 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.93) for the MADRS using the DSM-IV criteria. The best cut-off point was 16/17 with sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.82. The AUC for the CSDD was 0.83 (95% CI 0.71-0.95). The recommended cut-off score on the CSDD of 7/8 was valid but not the best in this study. The patients were diagnosed with a diagnosis of depression by only one psychiatrist, and the procedures in the two centres were not exactly the same. The MADRS has good discriminating power to detect depression in elderly persons and should be preferred to the CSDD for use with persons without dementia.Journal of Affective Disorders 03/2012; 141(2-3):227-32. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.042 · 3.71 Impact Factor