Article

Endovascular treatment of visceral and renal artery aneurysms.

Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Florida 33176, USA.
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR (Impact Factor: 1.81). 09/2011; 22(9):1246-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.05.012
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To analyze early and midterm results of endovascular treatment of visceral aneurysms regarding technical considerations, technical success rate, aneurysm rupture, and end-organ ischemia.
Endovascular treatment of 41 visceral and renal artery aneurysms (VAAs) in 40 consecutive patients (25 women; mean age, 59.4 y ± 16.2) was retrospectively reviewed. The series included 30 true aneurysms and 11 pseudoaneurysms in renal (n = 17), splenic (n = 13), hepatic (n = 4), celiac (n = 4), gastroduodenal (n = 2), and middle colic (n = 1) arteries. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were analyzed.
Forty-one aneurysms underwent endovascular treatment. Hypertension (73%) and hyperlipidemia (32%) were the most common associated comorbidities. Nineteen patients presented with symptoms of pain (15%) or rupture (32%) in 10 pseudoaneurysms (91%) and nine true aneurysms (30%; P = .0007). The most commonly used technique (93%) was coil embolization with (15%) or without (78%) other endovascular agents. The rate of technical success (cessation of hemorrhage or blood flow into aneurysm sac) was 98%. There was no periprocedural mortality. Mean hospital stays were 1 and 2 days for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, respectively. Mean clinical follow-up was 44.5 months; mean imaging follow-up was 11.7 months. The only complication was an intraprocedural thromboembolic event in one case (3%). Follow-up imaging evidence of end-organ partial infarct was detected in six patients (21%), with no clinical evidence of organ insufficiency.
Endovascular treatment of VAAs is a safe and highly successful procedure. Associated side effects such as distal embolization and end-organ infarcts were not found to be clinically significant.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
107 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hepatic artery pseudoaneurysms (HAP) are rare events, particularly after liver biopsy, but can be associated with serious complications. Therefore a high suspicion is necessary for timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment. We report on a case of HAP that potentially formed after a liver biopsy in a patient with sarcoidosis. The HAP in our case was virtually undetectable initially by angiography but resulted in several complications including recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding, hemorrhagic cholecystitis and finally hepatic infarction with abscess formation until it became detectable at a size of 5-mm. The patient remains asymptomatic over a year after endovascular embolization of the HAP. In this report, we demonstrate that a small HAP can avoid detection by angiography at an early stage while being symptomatic for a prolonged course. A high clinical suspicion with a close clinical/radiological follow-up is needed in symptomatic patients with history of liver biopsy despite initial negative work up. Once diagnosed, HAP can be safely and effectively treated by endovascular embolization.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 02/2014; 20(7):1878-81. · 2.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A renal artery aneurysm is defined as a dilated segment of renal artery that exceeds twice the diameter of a normal renal artery. Although rare, the diagnosis and incidence of this entity have been steadily increasing due to the routine use of cross-sectional imaging. In certain cases, renal artery aneurysms may be clinically important and potentially lethal. However, knowledge of their occurrence, their natural history, and their prognosis with or without treatment is still limited. This article aims to review the recent literature concerning renal artery aneurysms, with special consideration given to physiopathology, indications for treatment, different technical options, post-procedure complications and treatment outcomes.
    Current Urology Reports 01/2014; 15(1):376.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose To determine the impact of coil embolization of the splenic artery on splenic volume based on computed tomography (CT) imaging. Materials and Methods Splenic artery embolization (SAE) was performed in 148 consecutive patients over an 8-year period in an institutional review board–approved retrospective study. Of these, 60 patients (36 men; mean age, 49 y) had undergone contrast-enhanced CT before and after SAE with a mean time interval of 355 days. Pre- and postembolization splenic volumes were calculated with volume-rendering software. Presence of Howell–Jolly bodies was ascertained on laboratory tests. A trauma control group consisted of 39 patients with splenic laceration and follow-up CT but no splenic intervention. Results SAE in trauma patients resulted in an insignificant decrease in mean spleen size from 224 cm3 to 190 cm3 (P = .222). However, postembolization splenic volume was significantly smaller than follow-up volume in the trauma control group (353 cm3; P < .001). In nontrauma patients, the mean splenic volume decreased from 474 cm3 to 399 cm3 after SAE (P = .068). Multivariable analysis revealed that coil pack location was the only factor significantly affecting resultant splenic volume (P = .016). For trauma and nontrauma patients, distal embolization resulted in significant splenic volume loss (P = .034 and P = .013), whereas proximal embolization did not. No patients had persistent circulating Howell–Jolly bodies after SAE. No patients required repeat embolization or splenectomy. Conclusions Coil embolization of the splenic artery resulted in a modest but significant decrease in splenic volume when performed distally; proximal embolization resulted in an insignificant volume change.
    Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR 01/2014; · 1.81 Impact Factor