Transcriptional priming of Salmonella Pathogenicity Island-2 precedes cellular invasion.

Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.53). 01/2011; 6(6):e21648. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021648
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Invasive salmonellosis caused by Salmonella enterica involves an enteric stage of infection where the bacteria colonize mucosal epithelial cells, followed by systemic infection with intracellular replication in immune cells. The type III secretion system encoded in Salmonella Pathogenicity Island (SPI)-2 is essential for intracellular replication and the regulators governing high-level expression of SPI-2 genes within the macrophage phagosome and in inducing media thought to mimic this environment have been well characterized. However, low-level expression of SPI-2 genes is detectable in media thought to mimic the extracellular environment suggesting that additional regulatory pathways are involved in SPI-2 gene expression prior to cellular invasion. The regulators involved in this activity are not known and the extracellular transcriptional activity of the entire SPI-2 island in vivo has not been studied. We show that low-level, SsrB-independent promoter activity for the ssrA-ssrB two-component regulatory system and the ssaG structural operon encoded in SPI-2 is dependent on transcriptional input by OmpR and Fis under non-inducing conditions. Monitoring the activity of all SPI-2 promoters in real-time following oral infection of mice revealed invasion-independent transcriptional activity of the SPI2 T3SS in the lumen of the gut, which we suggest is a priming activity with functional relevance for the subsequent intracellular host-pathogen interaction.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Punicalagin, an essential component of pomegranate rind, has been demonstrated to possess antimicrobial activity against several foodborne pathogens, but its activity on virulence of pathogens and its anti-quorum sensing (QS) potential have been rarely reported. This study investigated the efficacy of sub-inhibitory concentrations of punicalagin on Salmonella virulence factors and QS system. A broth microdilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of punicalagin against ten Salmonella strains. Motility assay and quantitative RT-PCR were performed to evaluate the effects of punicalagin on virulence attributes and QS-related genes of Salmonella. MICs of punicalagin against several Salmonella strains ranged from 250 to 1 000 μg/ml. Motility assays showed that punicalagin, at the concentrations of 1/16 and 1/32 MIC, significantly decreased bacterial swimming and swarming motility, which corresponded to the down-regulation of the motility related genes (fliA, fliY, fljB, flhC and fimD) in RT-PCR assay. RT-PCR also revealed that punicalagin down-regulated the expression of most selected genes involved in Salmonella virulence. Moreover, QS inhibition assay indicated that punicalagin dose-dependently inhibited the production of violacein by Chromobacterium violaceum and repressed the expression of QS related genes (sdiA and srgE) in Salmonella. In addition, punicalagin significantly reduced Salmonella invasion of colonic cells (p < 0.01) with no impact on adhesion. These findings suggest that punicalagin has the potential to be developed as an alternative or supplemental agent for prevention of Salmonella infection.
    Applied and environmental microbiology. 08/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pathogenic bacteria have to cope with adverse conditions, such as the host environment and host defense reactions. To adapt quickly to environmental changes, pathogens have developed complex regulatory networks that ensure adequate expression of their virulence genes. Recent evidence suggests that Fis, an abundant nucleoid-associated protein transiently produced during early exponential growth, plays a major role in these networks in several pathogenic bacteria. This review focuses on two enterobacteria, Salmonella enterica and Dickeya dadantii, that inhabit distinct ecological niches to illustrate how Fis uses different strategies to coordinate virulence gene expression, depending on the bacterial lifestyle.
    Trends in Microbiology 12/2013; · 8.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The evolution of new gene networks is a primary source of genetic innovation that allows bacteria to explore and exploit new niches, including pathogenic interactions with host organisms. For example, the archetypal DNA binding protein, OmpR, is identical between Salmonella Typhimurium serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli, but regulatory specialization has resulted in different environmental triggers of OmpR expression and largely divergent OmpR regulons. Specifically, ompR mRNA and OmpR protein levels are elevated by acid pH in S. Typhimurium but not in E. coli. This differential expression pattern is due to differences in the promoter regions of the ompR genes and the E. coli ompR orthologue can be made acid-inducible by introduction of the appropriate sequences from S. Typhimurium. The OmpR regulon in S. Typhimurium overlaps that of E. coli at only 15 genes and includes many horizontally acquired genes (including virulence genes) that E. coli does not have. We found that OmpR binds to its genomic targets in higher abundance when the DNA is relaxed, something that occurs in S. Typhimurium as a result of acid stress and which is a requirement for optimal expression of its virulence genes. The genomic targets of OmpR do not share a strong nucleotide sequence consensus: we propose that the ability of OmpR to recruit additional genes to its regulon arises from its modest requirements for specificity in its DNA targets with its preference for relaxed DNA allowing it to cooperate with DNA-topology-based allostery to modulate transcription in response to acid stress.
    PLoS Genetics 03/2014; 10(3):e1004215. · 8.52 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from