Characteristics and factors associated with the risk of a nicotine exposed pregnancy: Expanding the CHOICES preconception counseling model to tobacco

Health Behavior Research and Training Institute, University of Texas at Austin, School of Social Work, Austin, TX, USA.
Maternal and Child Health Journal (Impact Factor: 2.24). 07/2011; 16(6):1224-31. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0848-z
Source: PubMed


The preconception counseling model tested in the CDC funded Project CHOICES efficacy trial to reduce the risk of an alcohol-exposed pregnancy (AEP) could be extended to smokers to prevent a nicotine-exposed pregnancy (NEP), when pharmacotherapy can be provided safely and disclosure of these risk behaviors is more likely. The CHOICES model, which incorporates motivational interviewing, encourages reduction of AEP risk by decreasing risky drinking or using effective contraception; in the efficacy trial, most women chose both options. We conducted a secondary analysis of the CHOICES epidemiologic survey data (N = 2,672) (Project CHOICES Research Group in Am J Prev Med 23(3), 166-173, 2002) to identify the prevalence of risk of NEP and the factors associated with this risk using logistic regression modeling procedures. Conducted in six settings with women at risk for AEP, the percentage of AEP was 12.5% (333/2,672) among women of childbearing age (18-44). A total of 464 of the 2,672 (17.4%) were at risk for NEP. Among women at-risk of an unplanned pregnancy (n = 1,532), the co-occurrence of AEP and NEP risk was more prevalent (16.3%) than AEP risk alone (5.5%) or NEP risk alone (14.0%). In the multivariable model, statistically significant correlates for NEP risk included lifetime drug use, prior alcohol/drug treatment, drug use in the last 6 months, being married or living with a partner, having multiple sexual partners in the last 6 months, physical abuse in the last year, and lower levels of education. These findings suggest that preconception counseling for NEP could be combined with a program targeting AEP.

6 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: CHOICES is an integrated behavioral intervention for prevention of prenatal alcohol exposure in women at high risk for alcohol-exposed pregnancies. The intervention uses motivational interviewing and cognitive-behavioral strategies, and targets adoption of effective contraception and reduction of alcohol use. The CHOICES intervention includes four manual-guided counseling sessions delivered by behavioral health counselors and one contraceptive session with a family planning clinician. CHOICES's efficacy has been established through a series of randomized controlled trials in settings including primary care, university hospital-based obstetrical/gynecology practices, urban jails, substance abuse treatment settings, and a media-recruited sample in three large cities. This article describes the CHOICES line of research including the epidemiology, feasibility, and efficacy studies. It also details the CHOICES intervention and the components of each session. In addition, the authors describe current studies testing modifications of the CHOICES intervention, the dissemination efforts to date, and implications for social work practice.
    Social Work in Public Health 05/2013; 28(3-4):224-33. DOI:10.1080/19371918.2013.759011 · 0.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Prescription opioid (PO) abuse has reached epidemic proportions in the United States, and pharmacies are locations from which these medications are often diverted. This study identifies factors associated with pharmacists who currently screen and discuss PO misuse with patients. Methods: A secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional Web-based survey that was sent to pharmacists was conducted. The survey contained items that assessed whether pharmacists currently screened and discussed PO misuse with patients along with pharmacists' attitudes and beliefs toward providing brief interventions. Multivariable models were developed which identified factors associated with pharmacists' currently screening and discussing misuse. Results: Chain setting pharmacists (odds ratio [OR] = 6.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-32.72) and pharmacists interested in being directly involved in PO screening and brief intervention research projects (OR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.35-3.15) were most likely to report current screening. Pharmacists who reported currently screening for misuse (OR = 4.27, 95% CI = 2.83-6.45) and who reported wanting to help patients who misuse POs (OR = 3.03, 95% CI = 1.50-6.15) were most likely to currently discuss abuse. Conclusions: Investigators implementing pharmacy-based screening and brief intervention studies for POs should take into account practice location and pharmacists' interest in addressing PO issues.
    Journal of Pharmacy Practice 02/2014; 28(4). DOI:10.1177/0897190014522064
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recommendations that all women of reproductive age have preconception care integrated into their primary care visits have been made since 1990. By looking at every premenopausal woman as a potential mother and advising her accordingly, primary care PAs can help women improve both their health and pregnancy outcomes.
    JAAPA: official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants 07/2015; 28(8). DOI:10.1097/01.JAA.0000469436.52325.cb