Highlights of the International Consensus Statement on Major Depressive Disorder

Neuropsychopharmacology Unit, Division of Experimental Medicine, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 5.5). 06/2011; 72(6):e21. DOI: 10.4088/JCP.9058tx2c
Source: PubMed


The International Consensus Group on Depression gathered to outline a universal treatment algorithm for depression with the purpose of merging the evidence base and standards of clinical practice from various countries, including the United States, Europe, the Middle East, China, and Japan. This brief summary includes the following recommendations made by the consensus group: periodically screen all patients for depression, use measurement-based tools and full psychiatric assessments to complete differential diagnoses, refer patients to psychiatric specialists when appropriate, establish a therapeutic alliance with patients and their families, begin treatment with an antidepressant for moderate or severe depression, treat patients to remission, and continually monitor patients' symptomatic improvement.

1 Follower
12 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by dysfunction in cognition, behavior, and physical functioning, and is associated with a chronic clinical course. There are barriers to successful treatment, which often result in early discontinuation and relapse. Adverse effects (AEs) remain the most commonly cited reason for discontinuation of treatment with conventional antidepressants, particularly early on in therapy. This often translates into relapse of symptoms or recurrence of the depressive episode. The delay to therapeutic response also has a meaningful implication for treatment adherence. Areas covered: This article focuses on the implications of a novel entity for the treatment of depression; the first new molecule developed for this indication in the last 10 years. Vilazodone is a novel dual-acting serotonergic antidepressant, which is a selective and potent inhibitor of serotonin reuptake, as well as a selective partial agonist of the 5-HT(1A) receptor. Expert opinion: The data available in the literature so far indicate clinical efficacy over placebo and a rather benign adverse event profile. Whether the early onset of clinical efficacy observed in one of the two pivotal studies represents a true or only a chance phenomenon, only future studies can tell. Adverse effects are mostly mild-moderate and most GI type AEs disappear in about one week, at a time when all patients are still on a clinically suboptimal daily dosage (10 mg/d during the first week). Sexual AEs did not differ from placebo. Vilazodone represents an interesting addition to the arsenal of available antidepressants.
    Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 09/2012; 13(15):2215-24. DOI:10.1517/14656566.2012.721776 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: It has been suggested that clinician-rated scales and self-report questionnaires may be interchangeable in the measurement of depression severity, but it has not been tested whether clinically significant information is lost when assessment is restricted to either clinician-rated or self-report instruments. The aim of this study is to test whether self-report provides information relevant to short-term treatment outcomes that is not captured by clinician-rating and vice versa. Methods: In genome-based drugs for depression (GENDEP), 811 patients with major depressive disorder treated with escitalopram or nortriptyline were assessed with the clinician-rated Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), and the self-report Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). In sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D), 4,041 patients treated with citalopram were assessed with the clinician-rated and self-report versions of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C and QIDS-SR) in addition to HRSD. Results: In GENDEP, baseline BDI significantly predicted outcome on MADRS/HRSD after adjusting for baseline MADRS/HRSD, explaining additional 3 to 4% of variation in the clinician-rated outcomes (both P < .001). Likewise, each clinician-rated scale significantly predicted outcome on BDI after adjusting for baseline BDI and explained additional 1% of variance in the self-reported outcome (both P < .001). The results were confirmed in STAR*D, where self-report and clinician-rated versions of the same instrument each uniquely contributed to the prediction of treatment outcome. Conclusions: Complete assessment of depression should include both clinician-rated scales and self-reported measures.
    Depression and Anxiety 12/2012; 29(12). DOI:10.1002/da.21993 · 4.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Use of psychotropic drugs has come to dominate clinical practice in psychiatry worldwide-perhaps owing largely to perceived simplicity, ease of use, and apparent efficiency, as well as apparent cost-effectiveness of such treatments. Nevertheless, medicinal treatments for patients with psychiatric disorders are but one component of comprehensive clinical care of complex human problems. Extensively updated since its second edition in 1985, Chemotherapy in Psychiatry, Third Edition, again addresses basic aspects of modern psychopharmacology and clinical applications of drugs used in the treatment of major psychiatric disorders, with major emphasis on psychotic, bipolar, and depressive disorders. The presentation covers descriptions of the main classes of psychotropic drugs, selected information concerning their known action mechanisms and metabolic disposition, and their clinical applications for acute illnesses and to prevent recurrences and long-term morbidity. Also covered are limitations and adverse effects of each type of agent, with emphasis on the fact that all psychotropic medicines have adverse effects that range from annoying to potentially lethal. Chemotherapy in Psychiatry, Third Edition, outlines the need to balance benefits and risks at the level of individual persons. Authoritative, and an important contribution to the literature, Chemotherapy in Psychiatry, Third Edition is an invaluable resource for physicians, scientists, trainees, and policymakers. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York. All rights are reserved.
Show more