Cause for concern in the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications in the community -a population-based study

The Health Observatory, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Campus, Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, Australia.
BMC Family Practice (Impact Factor: 1.74). 07/2011; 12:70. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-70
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) medications are a common cause of reported adverse drug side-effects. This study describes the prevalence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) use (other than low-dose aspirin) and the presence of co-existing relative contraindications to NSAID use and chronic conditions in a representative population sample.
Data were analysed from 3,206 adults attending first follow-up of the North West Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS) in 2004-2006, a longitudinal representative population study. Medications were brought into study clinic visits by participants. Clinical assessment included measured blood pressure, kidney function, serum cholesterol, blood glucose. Questionnaires assessed demographics, lifestyle risk factors, physician-diagnosed chronic conditions. Data were weighted to census measures by region, age group, gender, and probability of selection in the household, to provide population representative estimates. Pearson's Chi-square tests determined significant differences in proportions. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine associations of socio-demographic characteristics with use of NSAIDs.
Of 3,175 participants, 357 (11.2%), and 16% of those aged > 55 years, reported using either non-specific NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors, other than low-dose aspirin. Among people using NSAIDs, 60.8% had hypertension, 30.8% had Stage 3 or higher chronic kidney disease, 17.2% had a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 20.7% had a > 15% 10-year CVD risk. The prevalence of NSAID use among people with hypertension was 16%, with kidney disease 15.9%, and a history of CVD 20.0%. Among people taking diuretics, 24.1% were also taking NSAIDs, and of those taking medications for gastro-esophageal reflux, 24.7% were on NSAIDs. Prescription-only COX-2 inhibitors, but not other NSAIDs, were used more by people > 75 years than by 35-54 year olds (OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.0, 6.7), and also were more commonly used by people with hypertension, cardiac and kidney disease.
There is a high prevalence of current NSAID use among groups at-risk for significant drug-related adverse events or who have major chronic conditions that are relative contraindications to NSAID use. Assessment of absolute risks regarding cardiovascular and kidney disease need to take into account use of medications such as NSAIDs. The potential to make a substantial impact on chronic disease burden via improved use of NSAIDs is considerable.

Download full-text


Available from: Catherine Hill, Aug 09, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    • "Every hypertensive patient was treated with antihypertensive medication. Our results are in line with the results of Adams et al. (2011) who found that 60.8% of NSAID users have arterial hypertension and with the results of Lanas (2011) who documented antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in 57.6% of NSAID users. The most widely used antihypertensive drugs in our study group were drugs with high risk of decrease in antihypertensive effect when co-administered with NSAIDs (Johnson et al., 1994). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) belong to the most widely prescribed and used pharmacological agents worldwide. Data gathered in the last decade show increased incidence of thrombotic events during NSAID administration. Analysis of NSAID usage and assessment of risk for development of cardiovascular adverse effects is needed for improving patient safety. For limiting the impact of adverse effects on the health of patients, NSAID users should be informed about the possible adverse effects and their symptoms to ensure early detection and treatment discontinuation. In the presented study, we retrospectively analyzed the administration of NSAIDs in a group of patients (n=428) in need of analgesic treatment hospitalized at a department of internal medicine. Factors increasing the risk for cardiovascular adverse effects were also investigated. A separate questionnaire study was conducted to gather information concerning the knowledge of hospitalized NSAID users (n=251) about adverse effects of the medication used. For purpose of comparison, we conducted a similar study in a group of 234 random respondents from a shopping center. Data were evaluated using descriptive statistics, Student's t-test and chi-squared test. Our results suggest that the majority of patients treated with NSAIDs have factors indicating increased risk of development of adverse effects, most commonly arterial hypertension (58.2% of patients). The results of our questionnaire study show limited knowledge of NSAID users about the risk of the therapy. Nearly half of the respondents were unaware of any adverse effects. We consider as alarming that only a limited number of respondents were informed by their physician or pharmacist about the possible risks of treatment. In conclusion, we found that hospitalized NSAID users often have a history of diseases predisposing to the development of cardiovascular adverse effects of NSAIDs. Despite this, their knowledge about the risk of treatment is insufficient.
    Interdisciplinary toxicology 09/2013; 6(3):141-4. DOI:10.2478/intox-2013-0022
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Due to the widespread use of anti-inflammatory drugs in clinical practice in various clinical settings and the ease of issue without prescription, many patients are exposed to risks associated to these drugs and particularly to drug interactions. The purpose of this review is to deal with the safety parameters of main anti-inflammatory agents, especially NSAIDs including coxibs, and the different drug interactions with a special emphasis on clinical relevance and recommendations in current practice. We will present consecutively different interactions between anti-inflammatory agents and frequently used drugs. In particular, association between anti-inflammatory drugs and anticoagulants could induce severe complications. Haemorrhagic complications and particularly gastrointestinal bleeding will be discussed together with potential treatment adjustment and likely benefits of new therapies such as specific antagonist of active factor X or II. On the other hand, anti-hypertensive therapies, non specific cytochrome dysregulations and particularly the question of anti-arrhythmic drugs, the problem of proton pump inhibitors and specific clinical settings such as drug interactions in elderly are discussed.
    Anti-Inflammatory & Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry (Formerly Cu rrent Medicinal Chemistry - Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Allergy Agents) 12/2012; DOI:10.2174/1871523011312010006
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Once-daily, low-dose aspirin is a cornerstone in the prophylaxis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Aspirin 'resistance' still lacks definition, a standardized reference assay, underlying mechanisms, clinical impact or efficacy of alternative antiplatelet drugs. Aspirin response in several studies has been measured by different platelet function tests, not always reflecting aspirin pharmacodynamics, thus generating significantly heterogeneous results. The EMA indicated serum thromboxane B as the only valid surrogate assay to study different aspirin formulations. Rather than resistance, recent studies focused on sources of intra- and inter-individual variability in response to aspirin, based on pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic mechanisms. Drug interactions, diabetes, conditions of increased platelet output, obesity and aging can potentially increase the variability of aspirin response. Preliminary studies testing different aspirin regimens showed that twice-daily low doses were more effective than once-daily higher aspirin doses on surrogate end points of platelet inhibition. Large studies are needed to test new disease-tailored, low-dose aspirin regimens.
    Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 03/2013; 11(3):365-79. DOI:10.1586/erc.12.144
Show more