Article

Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan.
Vascular Health and Risk Management 01/2011; 7:345-51. DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S11253
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although porcine aortic valves or pericardial tissue mounted on a stent have made implantation techniques easier, these valves sacrifice orifice area and increase stress at the attachment of the stent, which causes primary tissue failure. Optimizing hemodynamics to prevent patient-prosthetic mismatch and improve durability, stentless bioprostheses use was revived in the early 1990s. The purpose of this review is to provide a current overview of stentless valves in the aortic position. Retrospective and prospective randomized controlled studies showed similar operative mortality and morbidity in stented and stentless aortic valve replacement (AVR), though stentless AVR required longer cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass time. Several cohort studies showed improved survival after stentless AVR, probably due to better hemodynamic performance and earlier left ventricular (LV) mass regression compared with stented AVR. However, there was a bias of operation age and nonrandomization. A randomized trial supported an improved 8-year survival of patients with the Freestyle or Toronto valves compared with Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves. On the contrary, another randomized study did not show improved clinical outcomes up to 12 years. Freedom from reoperation at 12 years in Toronto stentless porcine valves ranged from 69% to 75%, which is much lower than for Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valves. Cusp tear with consequent aortic regurgitation was the most common cause of structural valve deterioration. Cryolife O'Brien valves also have shorter durability compared with stent valves. Actuarial freedom from reoperation was 44% at 10 years. Early prosthetic valve failure was also reported in patients who underwent root replacement with Shelhigh stentless composite grafts. There was no level I or IIa evidence of more effective orifice area, mean pressure gradient, LV mass regression, surgical risk, durability, and late outcomes in stentless bioprostheses. There is no general recommendation to prefer stentless bioprostheses in all patients. For new-generation pericardial stentless valves, follow-up over 15 years is necessary to compare the excellent results of stented valves such as the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount and Hancock II valves.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
172 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: This study reviews a single-center experience with the Ross procedure in infants and young children. METHODS: From November 1993 to March 2012, 55 children aged less than 17 years underwent a Ross procedure. The patients ranged in age from 2 days to 17 years (median, 5.9 years). Thirteen patients were infants, and 18 patients were preschool children. The predominant indication for the Ross procedure was aortic stenosis. Twenty-seven patients (49%) with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction underwent a modified Ross-Konno procedure. Twenty-five patients (45%) had undergone 40 previous cardiac procedures. Preoperatively, 3 patients showed severe left ventricular dysfunction, with 2 of the patients requiring intubation and inotropic support. Concomitant procedures were performed in 11 patients (20%). Nine patients underwent mitral valve surgery, and 2 patients underwent subaortic membrane resection. RESULTS: Patients were followed up for a median of 66 months (range, 3 months to 17 years). Overall survival at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years was 84.9%. Hospital mortality rate was 13% (7/55 patients). All deaths occurred in neonates or infants, except 1 who was aged less than 4 years. Freedom from reoperation for autograft failure was 100% at 1 year, 96.7% at 5 years, and 73.7% at 10 years. During follow-up, 7 patients required a reoperation on the autograft for dilatation and severe aortic insufficiency. Freedom from reoperation for the right ventricular outflow tract replacement was 56.1% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: The low rate of autograft failure demonstrates that the Ross procedure is an attractive option for the management of aortic valve disease and complex left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in the pediatric population. However, alternative options must be considered in adolescents and young adults.
    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 03/2013; · 3.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heart valve tissue engineering based on decellularized xenogenic or allogenic starter matrices has shown promising first clinical results. However, the availability of healthy homologous donor valves is limited and xenogenic materials are associated with infectious and immunologic risks. To address such limitations, biodegradable synthetic materials have been successfully used for the creation of living autologous tissue-engineered heart valves (TEHVs) in vitro. Since these classical tissue engineering technologies necessitate substantial infrastructure and logistics, we recently introduced decellularized TEHVs (dTEHVs), based on biodegradable synthetic materials and vascular-derived cells, and successfully created a potential off-the-shelf starter matrix for guided tissue regeneration. Here, we investigate the host repopulation capacity of such dTEHVs in a non-human primate model with up to 8 weeks follow-up. After minimally invasive delivery into the orthotopic pulmonary position, dTEHVs revealed mobile and thin leaflets after 8 weeks of follow-up. Furthermore, mild-moderate valvular insufficiency and relative leaflet shortening were detected. However, in comparison to the decellularized human native heart valve control - representing currently used homografts - dTEHVs showed remarkable rapid cellular repopulation. Given this substantial in situ remodeling capacity, these results suggest that human cell-derived bioengineered decellularized materials represent a promising and clinically relevant starter matrix for heart valve tissue engineering. These biomaterials may ultimately overcome the limitations of currently used valve replacements by providing homologous, non-immunogenic, off-the-shelf replacement constructs.
    Biomaterials 06/2013; 34(30):7269-7280. · 8.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stentless prostheses have an interesting hemodynamic performance when compared to stented prostheses and are recommended in cases of small aortic annulus. From January 1996 to January 2004, 138 patients suffering from aortic disease, underwent aortic valve replacement. There was a significant difference in terms of time of extracorporeal circulation and aortic cross clamp. The actuarial survival at 4, 8, 12, and 15 years is 77%, 50%, 21%, and 18%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation at 4, 8, 12, and 14 years was 92%, 83%, 73%, and 63%, respectively. Freedom from all events, death, and reoperation at 4, 8, 12, and 14 years was 70%, 39%, 13%, and 8%, respectively. There is no statistical difference among the two groups in terms of actuarial survival, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from re-hospitalization for prosthesis-related causes. There was a significantly higher incidence of pacemaker implantation in Group A and the causes are not known. The rate of freedom from reoperation is high in both groups for the patients who remained alive. There was no statistical difference about prosthesis dysfunction between the two groups. The higher incidence of death in Group A cannot be explained by causes related to the prosthesis because there is no difference in terms of causes of death. Rates of reoperation did not differ between the two groups. The results obtained with stentless prostheses are encouraging even in long-term follow-up.
    Journal of Cardiology 11/2013; · 2.30 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
26 Downloads
Available from
Jun 3, 2014