Dyadic Characteristics and Intimate Partner Violence among Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Hubert Department of Global Health, Atlanta, GA.
The western journal of emergency medicine 07/2011; 12(3):324-32.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although the research community has begun to recognize intimate partner violence (IPV) as an important issue in same-sex relationships, there has been a lack of attention to characteristics of these relationships that may be associated with IPV. In particular, there has been a lack of attention paid to the associations between dyadic characteristics and IPV in same-sex relationships. This paper examined associations between dyadic characteristics, including relationship satisfaction, communal coping and efficacy, and perpetrating and experiencing IPV among a sample of United States men who have sex with men (MSM).
We collected data via an online survey with 528 MSM, who were greater than 18 years of age and reported at least one male sex partner in the last 12 months. The analysis examined dyadic factors associated with reporting of experiencing and perpetrating emotional violence, physical violence, and sexual violence.
The prevalence of violence in the sample ranged from nine percent reporting perpetrating sexual violence to 33% of men reporting experiencing emotional violence. MSM who reported greater satisfaction with their relationship or who reported a higher degree of concordance with their partner on lifestyle choices were less likely to report experiencing or perpetrating emotional violence. MSM who perceived a stigma to being in a male same-sex couple were less likely to report experiencing or perpetrating sexual violence.
The results presented here demonstrate high levels of IPV among MSM and that dyadic characteristics are associated with the occurrence of IPV. Understanding relationship characteristics associated with increased IPV among same-sex male couples can contribute to the development of more accurate IPV screening tools, and more sensitively and appropriately designed intervention messages.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While several studies have documented the prevalence of dating violence in the adolescent population, data remain scarce on sexual-minority youth (SMY). The most studied forms of dating violence are psychological/emotional, physical and sexual. Overall, dating violence estimates among SMY range from 8% to 89% for victimization and from 4% to 59% for perpetration. Psychological and emotional are the most prevalent forms of dating violence. Threats of outing by partners, a form of dating violence unique to SMY but rarely assessed, vary from 4% to 29%. SMY face the same risk factor as youth from the general population regarding dating violence vulnerability. However, heterosexism and minority stress contribute to increase SMY vulnerability to dating violence through internalized heterosexism and shame, sexual identity concealment, lack of external support and isolation within the relationship, reluctance to seek help because of fear of exposure, and reduced exposure to sexual-minority survivor role models. Dating violence prevention among SMY must take into account both general and SMYspecific risk factors. Providing tools to SMY to recognize and disclose dating violence, targeting specific protective and risk factors such as heterosexism and minority stress, increasing the capacities of sexual-minority communities, training domestic violence resources staff to sexual-minority specific issues are promising avenues for improving dating violence intervention among SMY. OpenAccess:
    Overcoming Domestic Violence: Creating a Dialogue Around Vulnerable Populations, Edited by M. F. Taylor, J. A. Pooley, 01/2015: chapter 5: pages 67-84; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.., ISBN: 9781633219564
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychological Aggression (PA) is a common and serious problem in the relationships of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals. It includes a range of behaviors that are used to hurt, coerce, control, and intimidate intimate partners. This paper reviewed the conceptualizations of PA, summarized the extant literature on PA among LGB women and men, and offered recommendations to improve the investigation of PA among LGB individuals. The conceptualization, definition, measurement, and prevalence of PA perpetration and victimization vary widely across studies. Different definitions and methods of assessing PA, a lack of consistency in examining and reporting psychometric information on measures used to assess PA among LGB samples, and varying sample characteristics make it difficult to compare results across studies. As a result, we know relatively little about the antecedents and consequences of PA among LGB individuals. In order to advance research in this area and increase understanding of this serious public health problem, it is necessary to: (1) clarify what constitutes PA; (2) specify the psychometric aspects of measures used to assess PA; (3) report details about sexual minority participants' sexual orientation/identity; (4) examine LGB-specific variables; and (5) utilize advanced methodological and statistical approaches to studying PA.
    Aggression and Violent Behavior 05/2014; 19(3). DOI:10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.001 · 1.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intimate partner violence (IPV) among men who have sex with men (MSM) is a significant problem. Little is known about the association between IPV and health for MSM. We aimed to estimate the association between experience and perpetration of IPV, and various health conditions and sexual risk behaviours among MSM. We searched 13 electronic databases up to 23 October 2013 to identify research studies reporting the odds of health conditions or sexual risk behaviours for MSM experiencing or perpetrating IPV. Nineteen studies with 13,797 participants were included in the review. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs). Exposure to IPV as a victim was associated with increased odds of substance use (OR = 1.88, 95% CIOR 1.59-2.22, I2 = 46.9%, 95% CII2 0%-78%), being HIV positive (OR = 1.46, 95% CIOR 1.26-1.69, I2 = 0.0%, 95% CII2 0%-62%), reporting depressive symptoms (OR = 1.52, 95% CIOR 1.24-1.86, I2 = 9.9%, 95% CII2 0%-91%), and engagement in unprotected anal sex (OR = 1.72, 95% CIOR 1.44-2.05, I2 = 0.0%, 95% CII2 0%-68%). Perpetration of IPV was associated with increased odds of substance use (OR = 1.99, 95% CIOR 1.33-2.99, I2 = 73.1%). These results should be interpreted with caution because of methodological weaknesses such as the lack of validated tools to measure IPV in this population and the diversity of recall periods and key outcomes in the identified studies. MSM who are victims of IPV are more likely to engage in substance use, suffer from depressive symptoms, be HIV positive, and engage in unprotected anal sex. MSM who perpetrate IPV are more likely to engage in substance use. Our results highlight the need for research into effective interventions to prevent IPV in MSM, as well as the importance of providing health care professionals with training in how to address issues of IPV among MSM and the need to raise awareness of local and national support services. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
    PLoS Medicine 03/2014; 11(3):e1001609. DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001609 · 14.00 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014