Article

Intraoperative blood and fluid administration differences in primary liver transplantation versus liver retransplantation.

Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC.
Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : official journal of the Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists 06/2011; 49(2):50-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.aat.2011.05.011
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Liver retransplantation (Re-LT) is the effective therapy for irreversible liver graft failure after primary liver transplantation (LT). The challenges faced by the operative team in the Re-LT setting have been seldom elucidated. Our aim is to analyze the differences in fluid management in primary LT and Re-LT during the surgical procedure.
The anesthesia charts of 16 patients who underwent both primary LT and Re-LT at our center in the space from October 1995 to May 2009 were analyzed. Group 1 (GI) consisted of patients who underwent primary LT, whereas patients in Group 2 (GII) were patients in GI but underwent Re-LT. GI was further divided into two subgroups depending on whether they had previous abdominal surgery before primary LT (GIB) or not (GIA). Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used to compare GI and GII, and GIA and GIB. A p value less than 0.05 was regarded as significant. Data were given as mean ± standard deviation.
Blood loss was significantly increased from 48.9 ± 106 mL/kg in GI to 251.5 ± 242 mL/kg in GII. Consequently more blood products, crystalloids, sodium bicarbonate, calcium chloride, and neosynephrine were required to support the hemodynamics in GII. In GI, GIB tended to bleed more and required more blood transfusions than GIA.
More bleeding is expected in Re-LT than primary LT. Additional anesthetic personnel, more intravenous lines, and blood and blood products should be readily available to deal with the emergent fluid and hemodynamic resuscitations in anesthesia for Re-LT.

0 Followers
 · 
85 Views
 · 
0 Downloads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Arterial neovascularization of liver grafts can be a source of significant blood loss during retransplantation. This study evaluated the effect of transcapsular arterial neovascularization on intraoperative blood loss during retransplantation and long-term follow-up. Eleven consecutive patients with transcapsular arterial neovascularization (seven male, four female; nine children, two adults; mean age 12.3 ± 16.3 years) and the same number of matched control patients were analysed. Blood loss was calculated based on transfusion requirements. The volume of transfused units of red blood cells per kilogram bodyweight until hepatectomy and during the entire procedure was significantly higher in patients with neovascularization than in control patients (0.32 ± 0.21 vs. 0.14 ± 0.11, and 0.94 ± 0.83 vs. 0.36 ± 0.38 respectively; P-values 0.027). Neovascularization was associated with extensive intra-abdominal adhesions and a longer operating time until hepatectomy (175.6 ± 52.1 min vs. 124.3 ± 34.9 min, P-value 0.015). Postoperative revisions were performed more frequently in patients with neovessels. Graft survival did not differ between groups. Assessment for transcapsular arterial neovascularization should be included in preoperative Doppler ultrasound protocols to identify patients at risk of a complicated intra- and postoperative course in case of retransplantation.
    Transplant International 01/2013; 26(4). DOI:10.1111/tri.12062 · 3.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Coagulopathy is common in patients with end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation (LT). Thromboelastography (TEG) test results are used for analyzing coagulation data and making a decision about the transfusion requirements. However, whether it is necessary to correct the abnormal coagulation profile during LT is a matter of considerable debate. Herein, we report our experience with two patients who had LT without blood product transfusion despite TEG results showing abnormal coagulation data. The TEG was performed four times during LT. Although blood product transfusion was necessary according to the TEG guidelines, it was avoided. At the end of operation, the hemoglobin level was 8.5 g/dL and 9.5 g/dL for Patient 1 and Patient 2, respectively. The patients tolerated LT well and their subsequent recovery was uneventful. We suggest that TEG should be used cautiously to make a decision about blood transfusion, as it can be totally avoided in selected cases involving living donor LT.
    Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica 03/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.aat.2014.02.003