Article

Partial breast irradiation delivered with proton beam: results of a phase II trial.

Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson Street, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Clinical Breast Cancer (Impact Factor: 2.42). 08/2011; 11(4):241-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2011.03.023
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A phase II trial sought to determine the safety and efficacy of proton beam irradiation to deliver partial breast radiotherapy after lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer.
Eligible patients included women with invasive nonlobular carcinoma ≤ 3 cm. Surgical therapy included lumpectomy with negative margins and negative axillary lymph nodes on sampling. Postoperative proton radiotherapy to the surgical bed with an additional 1-cm margin was delivered by 40 Gy in 10 fractions over a 2-week course. Patients received systemic therapy as recommended after proton treatment. Patients had clinical evaluations every 6 months and annual mammograms.
Fifty patients were enrolled; median follow-up was 48 months. All patients completed the prescribed treatment. Acute toxicities were limited to mild radiation dermatitis. Late skin toxicities included 3 grade 1 telangiectasias. There were no posttreatment infections or ulcerations and no cases of fat necrosis, rib fractures, radiation pneumonitis, or cardiac events. Actuarial 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 96% and 92%, respectively. No local failures occurred. Ipsilateral breast cancer developed in 1 patient 5.5 years after treatment. Dose-volume histogram analysis showed near-complete elimination of dose to the contralateral breast, lung, and heart.
Proton partial breast radiotherapy appeared to be a feasible method of treatment and provided excellent disease control within the ipsilateral breast. Treatment-related toxicity was minimal and no technical limitations prevented treatment delivery. The incidence of posttreatment complications may be less than that reported when using more invasive techniques; comparative trials should be considered.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
81 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Breast cancer radiotherapy represents an essential component in the overall management of both early stage and locally advanced breast cancer. As the number of breast cancer survivors has increased, chronic sequelae of breast cancer radiotherapy become more important. While recently published data suggest a potential for an increase in cardiac events with radiotherapy, these studies do not consider the impact of newer radiotherapy techniques commonly utilized. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to evaluate cardiac dose sparing techniques in breast cancer radiotherapy. Current options for cardiac protection/avoidance include (1) maneuvers that displace the heart from the field such as coordinating the breathing cycle or through prone patient positioning, (2) technological advances such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton beam therapy (PBT), and (3) techniques that treat a smaller volume around the lumpectomy cavity such as accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), or intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). While these techniques have shown promise dosimetrically, limited data on late cardiac events exist due to the difficulties of long-term follow up. Future studies are required to validate the efficacy of cardiac dose sparing techniques and may use surrogates for cardiac events such as biomarkers or perfusion imaging.
    Radiotherapy and Oncology 05/2014; · 4.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To present long-term outcomes of a prospective feasibility trial using either protons or 3-dimensional conformal photon-based (accelerated partial-breast irradiation [APBI]) techniques.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 05/2014; · 4.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The dose distributions that can be achieved with protons are usually superior to those of conventional photon external beam radiation. There are special cases where proton therapy may offer a substantial potential benefit compared to photon treatments where toxicity concerns dominate. Reirradiation may theoretically be made safer with proton therapy due to lower cumulative lifetime doses to sensitive tissues, such as the spinal cord. Proton therapy has been used in a limited number of patients with rectal, pancreatic, esophageal, and lung cancers. Chordomas and soft tissue sarcomas require particularly high radiation doses, posing additional challenges for reirradiation. Lymphoma is another special case where proton therapy may be advantageous. Late toxicities from even relatively low radiation doses, including cardiac complications and second cancers, are of concern in lymphoma patients with high cure rates and long life expectancy. Proton therapy has begun to be used for consolidation after chemotherapy in patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Breast cancer is another emerging area of proton therapy development and use. Proton therapy may offer advantages compared to other techniques in the setting of breast boosts, accelerated partial breast irradiation, and post-mastectomy radiotherapy. In these settings, proton therapy may decrease toxicity associated with breast radiotherapy. As techniques are refined in proton therapy, we may be able to improve the therapeutic ratio by maintaining the benefits of radiotherapy while better minimizing the risks.
    Seminars in Oncology. 12/2014;