School-Based Body Mass Index Screening and Parent Notification A Statewide Natural Experiment

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California St, Box 0503, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.
JAMA Pediatrics (Impact Factor: 5.73). 07/2011; 165(11):987-92. DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.127
Source: PubMed


To assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) screening with parental notification on weight status for California public school students.
A natural experiment wherein nearly all California school districts conducted annual BMI screening in the fifth, seventh, and ninth grades, but parental notification of BMI screening results was optional.
Data from mandatory fitness testing in California public schools for 2001 through 2008.
A total of 6 967 120 fifth-, seventh-, and ninth-grade youth (73% of enrolled students).
School-based BMI screening with optional parent notification.
Body mass index z score was the main outcome in adjusted mixed-effects linear regression models, assessing whether notifying parents of their child's BMI in a given year predicted BMI z score 2 years hence.
Rates of parental notification of BMI screening results increased from 35% in 2001 to 52% in 2008. Body mass index notification in fifth and/or seventh grade had no impact on subsequent BMI z scores (95% confidence interval, -0.03 to 0.01) compared with no notification. No differences in the impact of notification were seen by race/ethnicity. Results did not vary with sensitivity analyses.
These findings suggest that while BMI screening itself could have benefits, parental notification in its current form may not reduce pediatric obesity. Until effective methods of notification are identified, schools should consider directing resources to policies and programs proven to improve student health.

36 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We present a comprehensive picture of state requirements and recommendations for body mass index (BMI) and body composition screening of children and explore the association between pediatric obesity prevalence and state screening policies. Researchers completed telephone interviews with contacts at the departments of education for all 50 states and reviewed state content standards for physical education. Twenty states (40%) require BMI or body composition screening, and 9 states (18%) recommend BMI screening or a formal fitness assessment that includes a body composition component. The prevalence of adolescent obesity was higher in states that require BMI screening or fitness assessments with body composition than in states without requirements (16.7% vs 13.6%, P = .001). Future studies should evaluate the effect and cost-effectiveness of BMI and body composition screening on child obesity.
    Preventing chronic disease 09/2011; 8(5):A101. · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: School-based body mass index (BMI) or body composition screening is increasing, but little is known about the process of parent notification. Since 2001, California has required annual screening of body composition via the FITNESSGRAM, with optional notification. This study sought to identify the prevalence of parental notification when screening is required but notification is optional, and the methods and messages used. Researchers conducted phone interviews with 851 school districts (89%) in California and reviewed notification materials from 54 districts. As of 2008, 53% of California districts notified parents of screening results. Many districts (24%) did not know the reason for their notification policy. Most districts notified parents via a letter mailed home (70%) or sent home with the child (18%). Whereas 79% of sample letters provided students' BMI, only 12% provided an explanation of BMI, and only half provided tips on what parents should do if concerned about their child's results. In California, where body composition screening is required but parent notification is not, approximately half of school districts elect to notify parents of results, most commonly via letter. Most letters do not explain BMI or percent body fat scores, nor do they suggest what parents should do for a child identified as at-risk. Further research to identify interpretable and actionable notification messages for parents will be critical if school-based BMI and body composition screening and notification is to reduce childhood obesity.
    Journal of School Health 06/2012; 82(6):294-300. DOI:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2012.00700.x · 1.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The HEALTHY trial was designed to take a primary prevention approach to risk factors for type 2 diabetes in youth, primarily obesity. The study involved over 6,000 students at 42 middle schools across the U.S. Half received an integrated intervention program of components addressing the school food environment, physical education, lifestyle behaviors, and promotional messaging. The intervention was designed to be more comprehensive than previous efforts, and the research was amply funded. Although the primary objective of reducing the percentage of overweight and obesity in schools that received the intervention program, as compared with control schools, was not obtained, key secondary outcomes indicated an intervention effect. In retrospect, senior investigators involved in the study's design, conduct, and analysis discuss weaknesses and strengths and offer recommendations for future research efforts that address prevention of childhood obesity from a public health perspective.
    Current Diabetes Reports 10/2012; 13(1). DOI:10.1007/s11892-012-0333-0 · 3.08 Impact Factor
Show more


36 Reads
Available from