Article

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival compared with adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer only after complete pathologic response.

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Annals of Surgical Oncology (Impact Factor: 3.94). 07/2011; 19(1):253-8. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1877-y
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that is known to be chemosensitive. In patients with TNBC, we sought to compare survival outcomes between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with and without complete pathologic response (pCR), and those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.
We performed a retrospective chart review and identified 385 patients with stage I-III TNBC who were treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy between 2000 and 2008. Patients were divided according to receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pCR, neoadjuvant chemotherapy without pCR, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Data were compared using Fisher's exact test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Kaplan-Meier curves were generated.
Of 385 patients, 151 (39%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 234 (61%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-six (17%) of those patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy had pCR. After controlling for covariates associated with survival in unadjusted tests, patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with residual tumor had significantly worse survival compared with patients receiving adjuvant therapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51, P = 0.007] and a trend towards worse survival compared with patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy with pCR (HR = 0.19, P = 0.10).
Although previous clinical trials have not demonstrated a survival difference between patients receiving neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, our study suggests an overall survival benefit in patients with pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with patients receiving adjuvant therapy. It is clear that a prospective study needs to be carried out to better elucidate the timing of chemotherapy in patients with TNBC.

0 Followers
 · 
77 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the help of ever more powerful research tools triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is slowly yielding its secrets. The neoadjuvant setting gives us the best opportunity to address questions raised by the biologic heterogeneity of the disease, and eventually design individualized treatment plans for patients who are identified as likely to have a suboptimal response to chemotherapy. However, given a plethora of aberrantly activated pathways, exacerbated by its genomic instability, the challenge is to separate what drives the behavior of TNBC from the consequences of that behavior. This article reviews our current understanding of TNBC, including recent efforts to identify clinically relevant subsets of the disease, the role of treatments that exploit defects in DNA repair, including chemotherapeutic agents such as the platinum analogues, and biologic agents such as the poly ADP-ribose polymerases (PARP) inhibitors, and then discusses potential targeted approaches to its treatment, most of which are still early in development.
    Current Breast Cancer Reports 12/2012; 4(4). DOI:10.1007/s12609-012-0092-6
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard care regimen for patients with breast cancer. However, the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate remains at 30%. We hypothesized that a cancer stem cell marker may identify NAC-resistant patients, and evaluated CD133 and ALDH1 as a potential surrogate marker for breast cancer. The aim of this study was to find a surrogate maker to predict chemosensitivity of NAC for breast cancer. A total of 102 patients with breast cancer were treated with NAC consisting of epirubicin followed by paclitaxel. Core needle biopsy (CNB) specimens and resected tumors were obtained from all patients before and after NAC, respectively. Chemosensitivity and prognostic potential of CD133 or ALDH1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Clinical CR (cCR) and pCR rates were 18% (18/102) and 29% (30/102), respectively. Forty-seven (46%) patients had CD133-positive tumors before NAC, and CD133 expression was significantly associated with a low pCR rate (pā€Š=ā€Š0.035) and clinical non-responders. Multivariate analysis revealed that CD133 expression was significantly (pā€Š=ā€Š0.03) related to pCR. Recurrence was more frequent in patients with CD133-positive tumors (21/47, 45%) than that in patients with CD133-negative tumors (7/55, 13%). The number of patients with CD133-positive tumors (62%) after NAC was higher than that (46%) before NAC. Furthermore, most patients with CD133-positive tumors before NAC maintained the same status after NAC. CD133 before NAC might be a useful marker for predicting the effectiveness of NAC and recurrence of breast cancer after NAC.
    PLoS ONE 09/2012; 7(9):e45865. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0045865 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine outcomes in patients with breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer were enrolled. RESULTS: Mastectomy was avoided in 46% of patients, and 42% converted to negative nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Thirteen patients (18%) achieved a pathologic complete response, which was associated with the estrogen receptor (ER)-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2)-negative subtype (58%) and was significantly less likely to occur in the ER+/Her2- subtype (2%) (P < .01). Patients with the ER+/Her2+ subtype were most likely to have no response or progression during chemotherapy, compared with those with the ER-/Her2- subtype (50% vs 0%, P = .01). Five-year survival for patients achieving a pathologic complete response was 100%, compared with 74% in the group with partial response and 48% in the group with no response or progression (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with advanced breast cancer provided prognostic information, allowed evaluation of response to chemotherapy, decreased the mastectomy rate, and potentially reduced the need for axillary lymph node dissection.
    American journal of surgery 01/2013; 206(1). DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.025 · 2.41 Impact Factor
Show more