Article

Debate regarding the best surgical option for type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

Regional Vascular Unit, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Journal of vascular surgery: official publication, the Society for Vascular Surgery [and] International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter (Impact Factor: 2.98). 07/2011; 54(1):258-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.024
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Conventional open surgical repair, endovascular treatment, and the hybrid technique constitute the three treatment options for patients with type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Treatment is advocated to prevent rupture but yields significant risk for spinal cord ischemia, cardiovascular, and renal and respiratory complications, including death. Refinements in open surgical techniques and branched endovascular graft repair together with the development of hybrid techniques have been applied to the treatment of type IV-TAAAs to decrease the risk of these complications. However, much of the evidence of the argument is circumstantial. Large experiences are limited to a few centers worldwide with inherent disparity between patient groups and several limitations to the construction of a prospective randomized trial. This controversial subject is now open to discussion, and our debaters have been given the challenge to clarify the evidence to justify their preferred option for repair of type IV-TAAAs.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Michael P Jenkins, Feb 23, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
137 Views
 · 
27 Downloads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) represents a considerable technical challenge. Since its first description in 1955, open repair of TAAA has been considered the gold standard of repair. Despite improvements in surgical techniques, spinal cord protection and post-operative critical care support, patients who undergo open repair are faced with a mortality rate of 5-35 %. We report the first Irish experience of endovascular management of TAAAs. RESULTS: To date five patients have undergone endovascular repair; four had hybrid repair and one a fenestrated graft. The mean age of the patients was 66.8 ± 3.4 and the mean aneurysm diameter was 6.74 ± 0.6 cm. All patients were ASA III. Two-stage hybrid repair was associated with an increased risk of complications, prolonged intensive care unit and overall hospital stay. One patient died in the perioperative period due to rupture of their aneurysm between the two stages of their hybrid repair. CONCLUSION: The role of endovascular techniques in the treatment of TAAA continues to evolve. Hybrid and complete endovascular repairs do not replace conventional repair, but provide an alternative for high-risk patients who might otherwise be denied treatment.
    Irish Journal of Medical Science 06/2013; 183(2). DOI:10.1007/s11845-013-0974-2 · 0.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) open repair is considered relatively safer to repair than other extents of TAAA in terms of both perioperative mortality and spinal cord ischemia. Our purpose is to report our experience and to perform a literature review regarding extent IV TAAA open repair in order to provide an updated benchmark for comparison with any other alternative strategy in this aortic segment. From 1993 to 2015 we performed 736 open repairs for TAAA (177 extent I, 196 extent II, 141 extent III, 222 extent IV). In extent IV group there were 164 men (73.9%) and the mean age was 67.4 ± 9.3 years (range 32--84). The aneurysm etiology was degenerative in 198 patients (95.6%). Twelve patients (5.4%) underwent emergent operation. Totally abdominal approach was used in 22.0% of the cases. Until 2006 left heart bypass (LHBP) and cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) were almost never performed during extent IV repair. Since 2006 we changed our approach with a more aggressive use of LHBP (22.9%) and CSFD (43.4%) in 83 consecutive extent IV. Renal arteries perfusion was performed with 4°C Ringer's solution until 2009 and with 4°C Custodiol solution since September 2009 to date. Literature search was performed on several databases (PubMed, BioMedCentral, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials). Research was updated on March 1th 2015. Perioperative mortality in our overall group of TAAA and in the extents IV was 10.7% and 4.9%, respectively (P .01);; spinal cord ischemia rate 11.4% and 2.7%, respectively (P .0001). In the extents IV treated between 2006 and 2015 we observed a further trend of outcomes improvement with a rate of perioperative mortality and spinal cord ischemia of 1.2%, and 2.4%, respectively. Database searches yielded a total of 767 articles. Excluding non--pertinent titles or abstracts, we retrieved in complete form and assessed 27 studies according to the selection criteria. Nine studies were further excluded because of our pre specified exclusion criteria. The final 18 manuscripts included a total of 2098 patients. In this group median mortality rate was 4.8% (interquartile range 3.0--6.0) and the mean incidence of spinal cord ischemia was 1.56 ±1.54%. Perioperative outcomes after extent IV TAAA open repair were significantly better compared to our overall TAAA series. A more aggressive use of CSFD, LHBP and renal perfusion with Custodiol solution allowed a further trend of outcomes improvement in our series of extent IV TAAA open repair. Literature analysis confirmed during extent IV open repair very satisfactory preoperative outcomes with rates of mortality and spinal cord ischemia dropped to under 5% and 2%, respectively.
    The Journal of cardiovascular surgery 04/2015; · 1.37 Impact Factor