Is routine hysteroscopy during LLETZ a valuable additional procedure?
Department of Gynecology, Saint John of God Hospital, Vienna, Austria.Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (Impact Factor: 2.43). 07/2011; 90(11):1284-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01235.x
We aimed to critically review our experience with the value and risks of a diagnostic hysteroscopy performed in addition to LLETZ. We retrospectively included 442 womentients undergoing LLETZ and additional routine diagnostic hysteroscopy. Women for whom concomitant diagnostic hysteroscopy was somehow indicated were excluded. We focused on complications and intrauterine abnormalities detected by hysteroscopy that had not been seen on preoperative vaginal ultrasound. In 28/442 (6.3%), hysteroscopy and/or histological examination of the specimen removed by curettage revealed an abnormal intrauterine finding (benign endometrial polyps, n=20; benign cervical polyps, n=2; small leiomyomas inside the uterine cavity, n=1; septate/arcuate/unicornuate, n=5). A total of 38 surgical complications (8.6%) occurred. The two adverse events related to diagnostic hysteroscopy were uterine perforations (0.5%). In conclusion, only a few benign findings of questionable clinical relevance were discovered. Thus, we do not consider an additional routine diagnostic hysteroscopy during LLETZ beneficial for the patient.
- Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 10/2011; 91(6):760. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01290.x · 2.43 Impact Factor
- Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 10/2011; DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01291.x · 2.43 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.