Use of saline flush to prevent filter clotting in continuous renal replacement therapy without anticoagulant.
ABSTRACT This study aims to compare filter life between saline flushed and non-saline flushed strategies in critically ill patients at high risk of bleeding who are undergoing CRRT without anticoagulation.
A cohort of 121 critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring CRRT in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) and cardiac care unit (CCU) of a tertiary care academic center were included. 78 of them used saline flushed through CRRT circuit.
There was no significant difference between the two groups of treated patients in baseline characteristics, including the extent of coagulopathy and platelet count. Mean circuit survival was 21.2 h for circuits using saline flush and 20.4 h for those using non-saline flush (p = 0.8).The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no difference in circuit survival time between saline flushed and non-saline flushed groups (p = 0.8).
The use of saline flush into pre-filter site of CRRT circuit does not provide any benefit on circuit clotting prevention in high-risk of bleeding patients requiring CRRT without anticoagulant.
- SourceAvailable from: Edward Zimbudzi[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Introduction: Coagulation-free dialysis, also commonly known as “heparin-free” dialysis, can be a challenging procedure as it increases the risk of clotting the dialysis circuit. Utilizing a better saline flushing technique can lead to improved patient outcomes as well as huge financial benefits to the health institution. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of continuous saline infusion (CSI) and intermittent saline flushing (ISF) in preventing clotting of the dialysis extracorporeal circuit (ECC). Methods: Fifty heparin-free treatments were randomized into two treatment arms, namely CSI and ISF. Predialysis full blood count and coagulation studies were performed for all patients. During ISF, 100 mL saline was infused via the arterial line every 30 minutes while occluding the blood inlet line. Normal saline was infused into the ECC at a rate of 200 mL/hour throughout the duration of dialysis under CSI. The ECC was inspected for clotting and graded accordingly post-dialysis. Results: Seventy-six percent of the CSI treatments were completed without losing the ECC while 52% of the ISF treatments were also successful. Patients who were treated with CSI were less likely to have clotted ECCs (odds ratio 3.4, 95% CI, 1.04 to 11.2; P = 0.04). No significant differences existed between the two groups’ hematological factors that could influence clotting, such as hemoglobin and platelets. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that, when heparin-free dialysis is indicated, CSI might be a better method of preventing the ECC from clotting. There is a greater chance of realizing long-term benefits to patients and the health service with the CSI method since there is a likelihood of a reduction in the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents and blood transfusions with the CSI method. Keywords: continuous saline infusion, hemodialysis, heparin-free dialysis, intermittent saline flushingInternational Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 04/2013; 6:65-69.